用于新生儿复苏的可定制数字认知辅助工具:基于模拟的随机对照试验。

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-08 DOI:10.1097/SIH.0000000000000790
Laurie Benguigui, Solène Le Gouzouguec, Baptiste Balanca, Maud Ristovski, Guy Putet, Marine Butin, Bernard Guillois, Anne Beissel
{"title":"用于新生儿复苏的可定制数字认知辅助工具:基于模拟的随机对照试验。","authors":"Laurie Benguigui, Solène Le Gouzouguec, Baptiste Balanca, Maud Ristovski, Guy Putet, Marine Butin, Bernard Guillois, Anne Beissel","doi":"10.1097/SIH.0000000000000790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Adherence to the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) algorithm optimizes the initial management of critically ill neonates. In this randomized controlled trial, we assessed the impact of a customizable sequential digital cognitive aid (DCA), adapted from the 2020 ILCOR recommendations, compared with a poster cognitive aid (standard of care [SOC]), on technical and nontechnical performance of junior trainees during a simulated critical neonatal event at birth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For this prospective, bicentric video-recorded study, students were recruited on a voluntary basis, and randomized into groups of 3 composed of a pediatric resident and two midwife students. They encountered a simulated cardiac arrest at birth either (1) with DCA use and ILCOR algorithm poster displayed on the wall (intervention group) or (2) with sole ILCOR algorithm poster (poster cognitive aid [SOC]). Technical and nontechnical skills (NTS) between the two groups were assessed using a standardized scoring of videotaped performances. A neonate specific NTS score was created from the adult Team score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>108 students (36 groups of three) attended the study, 20 groups of 3 in the intervention group and 16 groups of 3 in the poster cognitive aid (SOC) group. The intervention group showed a significant improvement in the technical score ( P < 0.001) with an average of 24/27 points (24.0 [23.5-25.0]) versus 20.8/27 (20.8 [19.9-22.5]) in poster cognitive aid (SOC) group. No nontechnical score difference was observed. Feedback on the application was positive.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>During a simulated critical neonatal event, use of a DCA was associated with higher technical scores in junior trainees, compared with the sole use of ILCOR poster algorithm.</p>","PeriodicalId":49517,"journal":{"name":"Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Customizable Digital Cognitive Aid for Neonatal Resuscitation: A Simulation-Based Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Laurie Benguigui, Solène Le Gouzouguec, Baptiste Balanca, Maud Ristovski, Guy Putet, Marine Butin, Bernard Guillois, Anne Beissel\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SIH.0000000000000790\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Adherence to the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) algorithm optimizes the initial management of critically ill neonates. In this randomized controlled trial, we assessed the impact of a customizable sequential digital cognitive aid (DCA), adapted from the 2020 ILCOR recommendations, compared with a poster cognitive aid (standard of care [SOC]), on technical and nontechnical performance of junior trainees during a simulated critical neonatal event at birth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For this prospective, bicentric video-recorded study, students were recruited on a voluntary basis, and randomized into groups of 3 composed of a pediatric resident and two midwife students. They encountered a simulated cardiac arrest at birth either (1) with DCA use and ILCOR algorithm poster displayed on the wall (intervention group) or (2) with sole ILCOR algorithm poster (poster cognitive aid [SOC]). Technical and nontechnical skills (NTS) between the two groups were assessed using a standardized scoring of videotaped performances. A neonate specific NTS score was created from the adult Team score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>108 students (36 groups of three) attended the study, 20 groups of 3 in the intervention group and 16 groups of 3 in the poster cognitive aid (SOC) group. The intervention group showed a significant improvement in the technical score ( P < 0.001) with an average of 24/27 points (24.0 [23.5-25.0]) versus 20.8/27 (20.8 [19.9-22.5]) in poster cognitive aid (SOC) group. No nontechnical score difference was observed. Feedback on the application was positive.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>During a simulated critical neonatal event, use of a DCA was associated with higher technical scores in junior trainees, compared with the sole use of ILCOR poster algorithm.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000790\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/4/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000790","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:遵守国际复苏联络委员会(ILCOR)的算法可优化重症新生儿的初始管理。在这项随机对照试验中,我们评估了根据 2020 年 ILCOR 建议改编的可定制顺序数字认知辅助工具(DCA)与海报认知辅助工具(护理标准 [SOC])相比,对初级学员在模拟新生儿出生时危重事件中的技术和非技术表现的影响:在这项前瞻性、双中心视频录像研究中,学生们在自愿的基础上被招募,并随机分为三组,每组由一名儿科住院医师和两名助产士学生组成。他们遇到了模拟出生时心脏骤停的情况:(1) 使用 DCA 并在墙上张贴 ILCOR 算法海报(干预组);(2) 仅使用 ILCOR 算法海报(海报认知辅助[SOC])。两组之间的技术和非技术技能(NTS)采用录像标准化评分法进行评估。根据成人团队的得分,得出新生儿特定的 NTS 分数:108 名学生(36 组,每组 3 人)参加了研究,其中干预组 20 组,每组 3 人;海报认知辅助(SOC)组 16 组,每组 3 人。干预组的技术得分有明显提高(P < 0.001),平均为 24/27 分(24.0 [23.5-25.0]),而海报认知辅助(SOC)组为 20.8/27(20.8 [19.9-22.5])。没有观察到非技术性得分差异。应用反馈良好:结论:在模拟新生儿危重事件中,与仅使用 ILCOR 海报算法相比,使用 DCA 可使初级学员获得更高的技术评分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Customizable Digital Cognitive Aid for Neonatal Resuscitation: A Simulation-Based Randomized Controlled Trial.

Objective: Adherence to the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) algorithm optimizes the initial management of critically ill neonates. In this randomized controlled trial, we assessed the impact of a customizable sequential digital cognitive aid (DCA), adapted from the 2020 ILCOR recommendations, compared with a poster cognitive aid (standard of care [SOC]), on technical and nontechnical performance of junior trainees during a simulated critical neonatal event at birth.

Methods: For this prospective, bicentric video-recorded study, students were recruited on a voluntary basis, and randomized into groups of 3 composed of a pediatric resident and two midwife students. They encountered a simulated cardiac arrest at birth either (1) with DCA use and ILCOR algorithm poster displayed on the wall (intervention group) or (2) with sole ILCOR algorithm poster (poster cognitive aid [SOC]). Technical and nontechnical skills (NTS) between the two groups were assessed using a standardized scoring of videotaped performances. A neonate specific NTS score was created from the adult Team score.

Results: 108 students (36 groups of three) attended the study, 20 groups of 3 in the intervention group and 16 groups of 3 in the poster cognitive aid (SOC) group. The intervention group showed a significant improvement in the technical score ( P < 0.001) with an average of 24/27 points (24.0 [23.5-25.0]) versus 20.8/27 (20.8 [19.9-22.5]) in poster cognitive aid (SOC) group. No nontechnical score difference was observed. Feedback on the application was positive.

Conclusions: During a simulated critical neonatal event, use of a DCA was associated with higher technical scores in junior trainees, compared with the sole use of ILCOR poster algorithm.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
158
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Simulation in Healthcare: The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare is a multidisciplinary publication encompassing all areas of applications and research in healthcare simulation technology. The journal is relevant to a broad range of clinical and biomedical specialties, and publishes original basic, clinical, and translational research on these topics and more: Safety and quality-oriented training programs; Development of educational and competency assessment standards; Reports of experience in the use of simulation technology; Virtual reality; Epidemiologic modeling; Molecular, pharmacologic, and disease modeling.
期刊最新文献
Creation of a Novel Child Simulator and Curriculum to Optimize Administration of Seizure Rescue Medication. Increase in Newborns Ventilated Within the First Minute of Life and Reduced Mortality After Clinical Data-Guided Simulation Training. Systematic Review of Procedural Skill Simulation in Health Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Optimal Duration of High-Fidelity Simulator Training for Bronchoscope-Guided Intubation: A Noninferiority Randomized Trial. Theoretical, Conceptual, and Operational Aspects in Simulation Training With Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice: An Integrative Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1