对重症监护病房重症内科病人败血症警报的评估。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE American Journal of Critical Care Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.4037/ajcc2024566
Rebecca L Rich, Jennifer M Montero, Kyle E Dillon, Patrick Condon, Mathew Vadaparampil
{"title":"对重症监护病房重症内科病人败血症警报的评估。","authors":"Rebecca L Rich, Jennifer M Montero, Kyle E Dillon, Patrick Condon, Mathew Vadaparampil","doi":"10.4037/ajcc2024566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sepsis alerts commonly used for intensive care unit (ICU) patients can lead to alert fatigue because these patients generally meet 1 or more of the criteria for systemic inflammatory response syndrome. To identify ICU patients at greatest risk for sepsis-related consequences, an ICU-specific sepsis alert was implemented.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate an ICU sepsis alert based on modified criteria for systemic inflammatory response syndrome among critically ill medical patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective evaluation was conducted at a comprehensive tertiary referral center. Patients included were at least 18 years old, were admitted to the critical care medicine service, and had at least 1 sepsis alert between January 1 and February 29, 2020. The sepsis alert identified patients meeting at least 2 modified systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria (white blood cell count, <4000/μL or >12 000/μL; body temperature, <36 °C or >38.3 °C; heart rate, >110/min; and respiratory rate, >21/min), with at least 1 of the 2 criteria being white blood cell count or body temperature.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For 128 alerts evaluated, the positive predictive value was 72%. Of 713 patients who were admitted to the critical care medicine service and did not have a sepsis alert, 7 received a sepsis diagnosis. The ICU sepsis alert had a negative predictive value of 99%, sensitivity of 92.9%, and specificity of 95.1%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An ICU sepsis alert using modified systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria was effective for identifying sepsis in critically ill medical patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":7607,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Critical Care","volume":"33 3","pages":"212-216"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of an Intensive Care Unit Sepsis Alert in Critically Ill Medical Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca L Rich, Jennifer M Montero, Kyle E Dillon, Patrick Condon, Mathew Vadaparampil\",\"doi\":\"10.4037/ajcc2024566\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sepsis alerts commonly used for intensive care unit (ICU) patients can lead to alert fatigue because these patients generally meet 1 or more of the criteria for systemic inflammatory response syndrome. To identify ICU patients at greatest risk for sepsis-related consequences, an ICU-specific sepsis alert was implemented.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate an ICU sepsis alert based on modified criteria for systemic inflammatory response syndrome among critically ill medical patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective evaluation was conducted at a comprehensive tertiary referral center. Patients included were at least 18 years old, were admitted to the critical care medicine service, and had at least 1 sepsis alert between January 1 and February 29, 2020. The sepsis alert identified patients meeting at least 2 modified systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria (white blood cell count, <4000/μL or >12 000/μL; body temperature, <36 °C or >38.3 °C; heart rate, >110/min; and respiratory rate, >21/min), with at least 1 of the 2 criteria being white blood cell count or body temperature.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For 128 alerts evaluated, the positive predictive value was 72%. Of 713 patients who were admitted to the critical care medicine service and did not have a sepsis alert, 7 received a sepsis diagnosis. The ICU sepsis alert had a negative predictive value of 99%, sensitivity of 92.9%, and specificity of 95.1%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An ICU sepsis alert using modified systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria was effective for identifying sepsis in critically ill medical patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7607,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Critical Care\",\"volume\":\"33 3\",\"pages\":\"212-216\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Critical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2024566\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2024566","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:重症监护病房(ICU)患者常用的败血症警报可能会导致警报疲劳,因为这些患者通常符合一种或多种全身炎症反应综合征的标准。为了识别脓毒症相关后果风险最大的重症监护病房患者,我们实施了重症监护病房专用脓毒症警报:目的:根据重症内科病人全身炎症反应综合征的修改标准,对 ICU 败血症警报进行评估:这项回顾性评估在一家综合性三级转诊中心进行。纳入的患者至少年满 18 岁,在重症医学科住院,并且在 2020 年 1 月 1 日至 2 月 29 日期间至少出现过一次脓毒症警报。败血症警报确定患者至少符合 2 项改良的全身炎症反应综合征标准(白细胞计数,12 000/μL;体温,38.3 °C;心率,>110/min;呼吸频率,>21/min),2 项标准中至少有 1 项是白细胞计数或体温:在评估的 128 项警报中,阳性预测值为 72%。在重症医学科收治的 713 名未收到败血症警报的患者中,有 7 人得到了败血症诊断。ICU 败血症警报的阴性预测值为 99%,灵敏度为 92.9%,特异性为 95.1%:采用改良的全身炎症反应综合征标准发出重症监护病房败血症警报可有效识别重症内科病人的败血症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of an Intensive Care Unit Sepsis Alert in Critically Ill Medical Patients.

Background: Sepsis alerts commonly used for intensive care unit (ICU) patients can lead to alert fatigue because these patients generally meet 1 or more of the criteria for systemic inflammatory response syndrome. To identify ICU patients at greatest risk for sepsis-related consequences, an ICU-specific sepsis alert was implemented.

Objective: To evaluate an ICU sepsis alert based on modified criteria for systemic inflammatory response syndrome among critically ill medical patients.

Methods: This retrospective evaluation was conducted at a comprehensive tertiary referral center. Patients included were at least 18 years old, were admitted to the critical care medicine service, and had at least 1 sepsis alert between January 1 and February 29, 2020. The sepsis alert identified patients meeting at least 2 modified systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria (white blood cell count, <4000/μL or >12 000/μL; body temperature, <36 °C or >38.3 °C; heart rate, >110/min; and respiratory rate, >21/min), with at least 1 of the 2 criteria being white blood cell count or body temperature.

Results: For 128 alerts evaluated, the positive predictive value was 72%. Of 713 patients who were admitted to the critical care medicine service and did not have a sepsis alert, 7 received a sepsis diagnosis. The ICU sepsis alert had a negative predictive value of 99%, sensitivity of 92.9%, and specificity of 95.1%.

Conclusions: An ICU sepsis alert using modified systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria was effective for identifying sepsis in critically ill medical patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
103
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The editors of the American Journal of Critical Care (AJCC) invite authors to submit original manuscripts describing investigations, advances, or observations from all specialties related to the care of critically and acutely ill patients. Papers promoting collaborative practice and research are encouraged. Manuscripts will be considered on the understanding that they have not been published elsewhere and have been submitted solely to AJCC.
期刊最新文献
Association of Area Deprivation Index With Mortality in Critically Ill Adults With COVID-19. Chest Discomfort After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Clinical Pearls. Discussion Guide for the Wool Article. Factors Associated With Parent-Perceived Miscommunication in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1