Stefanie Kirchner, Benedikt Till, Zrinka Laido, Thomas Niederkrotenthaler
{"title":"与自杀有关的媒体报道,重点关注性和性别少数群体身份。","authors":"Stefanie Kirchner, Benedikt Till, Zrinka Laido, Thomas Niederkrotenthaler","doi":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000956","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background:</i> Little is known about the quality of media reports on suicide and prevention targeting persons with sexual or gender minority identities (LGBTQ+). <i>Aims:</i> To assess the quality of suicide-related media reporting of LGBTQ+ people and its consistency with media guidelines. <i>Method:</i> We conducted a content analysis of 5,652 media items in two US states (Washington and Oregon) published within 1 year. <i>Results:</i> There were only few differences in the reporting about suicide in LGBTQ+ as compared to non-LGBTQ+ reports. LGBTQ+ media items more often portrayed suicide as monocausal [Oregon: <i>OR</i> = 1.75, 95% CI (1.03-2.98), <i>p</i> = .038; Washington: <i>OR</i> = 3.00, 95% CI (1.81-4.97), <i>p</i> < .001] and linked them to adverse life experiences [<i>OR</i> = 2.16, 95% CI (1.38-3.38), <i>p <</i> .001; <i>OR</i> = 2.09, 95% CI (1.30-3.38), <i>p</i> = .002] than non-LGBTQ+ items. They also more often featured mental health experts [<i>OR</i> = 1.79, 95% CI (1.04-3.10), <i>p</i> = .034; <i>OR</i> = 2.12, 95% CI (1.23-3.67), <i>p</i> = .006] and contacts to support services [<i>OR</i> = 2.22, 95% CI (1.41-3.48), <i>p</i> < .001; <i>OR</i> = 2.70, 95% CI (1.64-4.45), <i>p</i> < .001]. <i>Limitations:</i> Aspects possibly influencing the portrayal of LGBTQ+ suicide and prevention beyond the characteristics listed were not investigated. <i>Conclusion:</i> Suicide-related media reporting related to LGBTQ+ issues features potentially beneficial aspects but tends to overlook multifactorial causes of suicide. Diverse factors contributing to LGBTQ+ suicide and prevention warrant greater attention.</p>","PeriodicalId":47943,"journal":{"name":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"339-347"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Suicide-Related Media Reporting With a Focus on Sexual and Gender Minority Identities.\",\"authors\":\"Stefanie Kirchner, Benedikt Till, Zrinka Laido, Thomas Niederkrotenthaler\",\"doi\":\"10.1027/0227-5910/a000956\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background:</i> Little is known about the quality of media reports on suicide and prevention targeting persons with sexual or gender minority identities (LGBTQ+). <i>Aims:</i> To assess the quality of suicide-related media reporting of LGBTQ+ people and its consistency with media guidelines. <i>Method:</i> We conducted a content analysis of 5,652 media items in two US states (Washington and Oregon) published within 1 year. <i>Results:</i> There were only few differences in the reporting about suicide in LGBTQ+ as compared to non-LGBTQ+ reports. LGBTQ+ media items more often portrayed suicide as monocausal [Oregon: <i>OR</i> = 1.75, 95% CI (1.03-2.98), <i>p</i> = .038; Washington: <i>OR</i> = 3.00, 95% CI (1.81-4.97), <i>p</i> < .001] and linked them to adverse life experiences [<i>OR</i> = 2.16, 95% CI (1.38-3.38), <i>p <</i> .001; <i>OR</i> = 2.09, 95% CI (1.30-3.38), <i>p</i> = .002] than non-LGBTQ+ items. They also more often featured mental health experts [<i>OR</i> = 1.79, 95% CI (1.04-3.10), <i>p</i> = .034; <i>OR</i> = 2.12, 95% CI (1.23-3.67), <i>p</i> = .006] and contacts to support services [<i>OR</i> = 2.22, 95% CI (1.41-3.48), <i>p</i> < .001; <i>OR</i> = 2.70, 95% CI (1.64-4.45), <i>p</i> < .001]. <i>Limitations:</i> Aspects possibly influencing the portrayal of LGBTQ+ suicide and prevention beyond the characteristics listed were not investigated. <i>Conclusion:</i> Suicide-related media reporting related to LGBTQ+ issues features potentially beneficial aspects but tends to overlook multifactorial causes of suicide. Diverse factors contributing to LGBTQ+ suicide and prevention warrant greater attention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47943,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"339-347\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a000956\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/4/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a000956","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:关于媒体对性少数群体或性别少数群体(LGBTQ+)的自杀和自杀预防报道的质量,人们知之甚少。目的:评估媒体对 LGBTQ+ 自杀相关报道的质量及其与媒体指南的一致性。方法:对我们对美国两个州(华盛顿州和俄勒冈州)一年内发布的 5,652 篇媒体报道进行了内容分析。结果显示与非 LGBTQ+ 的报道相比,LGBTQ+ 对自杀的报道几乎没有差异。LGBTQ+ 媒体报道更多地将自杀描述为单因自杀[俄勒冈州:OR=1.75,95% CI (1.03-2.98),p=0.038;华盛顿州:OR = 3.00,95% CI (1.81-4.97),p < .001],并且与非 LGBTQ+ 媒体相比,将自杀与不良生活经历联系起来[OR = 2.16,95% CI (1.38-3.38),p .001;OR = 2.09,95% CI (1.30-3.38),p = .002]。他们还更经常地介绍心理健康专家[OR = 1.79,95% CI (1.04-3.10),p = .034;OR = 2.12,95% CI (1.23-3.67),p = .006]和支持服务联系人[OR = 2.22,95% CI (1.41-3.48),p < .001;OR = 2.70,95% CI (1.64-4.45),p < .001]。局限性:除列出的特征外,未调查可能影响 LGBTQ+ 自杀形象和预防的其他方面。结论:与 LGBTQ+ 问题相关的自杀相关媒体报道具有潜在的有益方面,但往往忽略了自杀的多因素原因。导致 LGBTQ+ 自杀和自杀预防的多种因素值得更多关注。
Suicide-Related Media Reporting With a Focus on Sexual and Gender Minority Identities.
Background: Little is known about the quality of media reports on suicide and prevention targeting persons with sexual or gender minority identities (LGBTQ+). Aims: To assess the quality of suicide-related media reporting of LGBTQ+ people and its consistency with media guidelines. Method: We conducted a content analysis of 5,652 media items in two US states (Washington and Oregon) published within 1 year. Results: There were only few differences in the reporting about suicide in LGBTQ+ as compared to non-LGBTQ+ reports. LGBTQ+ media items more often portrayed suicide as monocausal [Oregon: OR = 1.75, 95% CI (1.03-2.98), p = .038; Washington: OR = 3.00, 95% CI (1.81-4.97), p < .001] and linked them to adverse life experiences [OR = 2.16, 95% CI (1.38-3.38), p < .001; OR = 2.09, 95% CI (1.30-3.38), p = .002] than non-LGBTQ+ items. They also more often featured mental health experts [OR = 1.79, 95% CI (1.04-3.10), p = .034; OR = 2.12, 95% CI (1.23-3.67), p = .006] and contacts to support services [OR = 2.22, 95% CI (1.41-3.48), p < .001; OR = 2.70, 95% CI (1.64-4.45), p < .001]. Limitations: Aspects possibly influencing the portrayal of LGBTQ+ suicide and prevention beyond the characteristics listed were not investigated. Conclusion: Suicide-related media reporting related to LGBTQ+ issues features potentially beneficial aspects but tends to overlook multifactorial causes of suicide. Diverse factors contributing to LGBTQ+ suicide and prevention warrant greater attention.
期刊介绍:
A must for all who need to keep up on the latest findings from both basic research and practical experience in the fields of suicide prevention and crisis intervention! This well-established periodical’s reputation for publishing important articles on suicidology and crisis intervention from around the world is being further enhanced with the move to 6 issues per year (previously 4) in 2010. But over and above its scientific reputation, Crisis also publishes potentially life-saving information for all those involved in crisis intervention and suicide prevention, making it important reading for clinicians, counselors, hotlines, and crisis intervention centers.