雾化右美托咪定在印度南部日间护理柔性支气管镜检查中用于意识镇静的临床实用性。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Indian Journal of Pharmacology Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-30 DOI:10.4103/ijp.ijp_160_23
Thomas Antony, K Vishak Acharya, Preetam Rajgopal Acharya, Himani Kotian, Sindhu Kamath
{"title":"雾化右美托咪定在印度南部日间护理柔性支气管镜检查中用于意识镇静的临床实用性。","authors":"Thomas Antony, K Vishak Acharya, Preetam Rajgopal Acharya, Himani Kotian, Sindhu Kamath","doi":"10.4103/ijp.ijp_160_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sedative agents used in bronchoscopy require trained personnel to administer and monitor the patient. This increases the procedure cost, duration, and inpatient stay. Inhalational administration of sedative agents can be a practical solution to the issue. Dexmedetomidine in the inhalational form could give results similar to the intravenous form without significant adverse events.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study is prospective, randomized, and double-blinded study. Patients needing bronchoscopy were randomized to receive the nebulized form of either dexmedetomidine or saline (0.9%) before bronchoscopy. The study parameters are assessed and recorded before, during, and after bronchoscopy. Data collected are analyzed using the SPSS software.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The side effects limit using commonly administered sedation agents in bronchoscopy, such as midazolam, fentanyl, and dexmedetomidine. The nebulized dexmedetomidine is safe with proven efficacy when compared to the placebo. Proceduralist-administered conscious sedation reduces the overall cost and shortens inpatient stays. Attenuation of hemodynamic parameters by dexmedetomidine could be an advantage for the physician in reducing an untoward cardiac event.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dexmedetomidine in the nebulized form improves the comfort of patients during the procedure. It blunts the pressure response during bronchoscopy and could be a safer and cost-effective agent in its nebulized form for conscious sedation in bronchoscopy. The study is approved by the institutional ethics committee (IEC KMC MLR 10-2021-310).</p>","PeriodicalId":13490,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Pharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11161002/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical usefulness of nebulized dexmedetomidine for conscious sedation in daycare flexible bronchoscopy in Southern India.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Antony, K Vishak Acharya, Preetam Rajgopal Acharya, Himani Kotian, Sindhu Kamath\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ijp.ijp_160_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sedative agents used in bronchoscopy require trained personnel to administer and monitor the patient. This increases the procedure cost, duration, and inpatient stay. Inhalational administration of sedative agents can be a practical solution to the issue. Dexmedetomidine in the inhalational form could give results similar to the intravenous form without significant adverse events.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study is prospective, randomized, and double-blinded study. Patients needing bronchoscopy were randomized to receive the nebulized form of either dexmedetomidine or saline (0.9%) before bronchoscopy. The study parameters are assessed and recorded before, during, and after bronchoscopy. Data collected are analyzed using the SPSS software.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The side effects limit using commonly administered sedation agents in bronchoscopy, such as midazolam, fentanyl, and dexmedetomidine. The nebulized dexmedetomidine is safe with proven efficacy when compared to the placebo. Proceduralist-administered conscious sedation reduces the overall cost and shortens inpatient stays. Attenuation of hemodynamic parameters by dexmedetomidine could be an advantage for the physician in reducing an untoward cardiac event.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dexmedetomidine in the nebulized form improves the comfort of patients during the procedure. It blunts the pressure response during bronchoscopy and could be a safer and cost-effective agent in its nebulized form for conscious sedation in bronchoscopy. The study is approved by the institutional ethics committee (IEC KMC MLR 10-2021-310).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Pharmacology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11161002/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijp.ijp_160_23\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/4/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijp.ijp_160_23","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:支气管镜检查中使用的镇静剂需要训练有素的人员来管理和监控病人。这增加了手术成本、持续时间和住院时间。吸入镇静剂可以切实解决这一问题。吸入形式的右美托咪定可产生与静脉形式相似的效果,且无明显不良反应:本研究为前瞻性、随机和双盲研究。需要进行支气管镜检查的患者在接受支气管镜检查前随机接受雾化形式的右美托咪定或生理盐水(0.9%)。研究参数在支气管镜检查前、检查中和检查后进行评估和记录。收集的数据使用 SPSS 软件进行分析:在支气管镜检查中使用咪达唑仑、芬太尼和右美托咪定等常用镇静剂会产生副作用。与安慰剂相比,雾化右美托咪定安全有效。由手术医师管理的意识镇静可降低总体成本,缩短住院时间。右美托咪定对血流动力学参数的减弱可为医生减少意外心脏事件的发生提供有利条件:结论:雾化吸入右美托咪定可提高患者在手术过程中的舒适度。结论:雾化右美托咪定可提高患者在手术过程中的舒适度,减弱支气管镜检查过程中的压力反应,是支气管镜检查中更安全、更经济的意识镇静剂。该研究已获得机构伦理委员会批准(IEC KMC MLR 10-2021-310)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical usefulness of nebulized dexmedetomidine for conscious sedation in daycare flexible bronchoscopy in Southern India.

Background: Sedative agents used in bronchoscopy require trained personnel to administer and monitor the patient. This increases the procedure cost, duration, and inpatient stay. Inhalational administration of sedative agents can be a practical solution to the issue. Dexmedetomidine in the inhalational form could give results similar to the intravenous form without significant adverse events.

Materials and methods: The study is prospective, randomized, and double-blinded study. Patients needing bronchoscopy were randomized to receive the nebulized form of either dexmedetomidine or saline (0.9%) before bronchoscopy. The study parameters are assessed and recorded before, during, and after bronchoscopy. Data collected are analyzed using the SPSS software.

Discussion: The side effects limit using commonly administered sedation agents in bronchoscopy, such as midazolam, fentanyl, and dexmedetomidine. The nebulized dexmedetomidine is safe with proven efficacy when compared to the placebo. Proceduralist-administered conscious sedation reduces the overall cost and shortens inpatient stays. Attenuation of hemodynamic parameters by dexmedetomidine could be an advantage for the physician in reducing an untoward cardiac event.

Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine in the nebulized form improves the comfort of patients during the procedure. It blunts the pressure response during bronchoscopy and could be a safer and cost-effective agent in its nebulized form for conscious sedation in bronchoscopy. The study is approved by the institutional ethics committee (IEC KMC MLR 10-2021-310).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.20%
发文量
53
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Pharmacology accepts, in English, review articles, articles for educational forum, original research articles (full length and short communications), letter to editor, case reports and interesting fillers. Articles concerning all aspects of pharmacology will be considered. Articles of general interest (e.g. methods, therapeutics, medical education, interesting websites, new drug information and commentary on a recent topic) are also welcome.
期刊最新文献
Applying quantitative and systems pharmacology to drug development and beyond: An introduction to clinical pharmacologists Prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, two-arm study to evaluate the efficacy of coadministration of garlic as a hydrogen sulfide donor and tadalafil in patients with erectile dysfunction not responding to tadalafil alone – A pilot study Advancing pediatric drug development in South Asia: Current landscape and vision for the future Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis following ceftriaxone. Pharmacomicrobiomics - Another frontier of precision medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1