精神分裂症患者对氯氮平部分或无应答的增效策略:随机对照试验的贝叶斯网络 Meta 分析》。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-05-31 Epub Date: 2023-11-30 DOI:10.9758/cpn.23.1119
Archana Mishra, Rituparna Maiti, Biswa Ranjan Mishra, Anand Srinivasan
{"title":"精神分裂症患者对氯氮平部分或无应答的增效策略:随机对照试验的贝叶斯网络 Meta 分析》。","authors":"Archana Mishra, Rituparna Maiti, Biswa Ranjan Mishra, Anand Srinivasan","doi":"10.9758/cpn.23.1119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clozapine is the only approved drug for treatment-resistant schizophrenia, but the response to the drug is often inadequate. Augmentation with other antipsychotics, anticonvulsants, and antidepressants is recommended for such patients, but there is a lack of evidence regarding the most effective therapy. This network meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of pharmacological agents used in the augmentation strategies in patients who were partial/ non-responders to clozapine. Relevant data were extracted from 30 randomized controlled trials through searches of electronic databases (MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, clinical trial registries). PRISMA guidelines were followed for the extraction, management, analysis, and reporting of the data. The outcome measure in this study was a reduction in symptom severity according to total PANSS/BPRS and was reported as the standardized mean difference with a 95% credible interval. Bayesian network meta-analysis with random effects model and uninformative priors was conducted, and the ranking probability of each intervention was done. Meta-regression was done to assess the effect of duration on the reduction in symptom severity scores. Mirtazapine (-5.2 [95%CrI: -7.7, -2.7]) and memantine (-2.1 [95%CrI: -4.0, -0.19]] were more efficacious than placebo for augmentation of clozapine in partial/non-responders and were the most effective adjunctive agents as per SUCRA scores. Both drugs did not cause a significant increase in frequency of adverse events compared to placebo. There was a significant effect of duration on the reduction in symptom severity. There was no evident publication bias. Mirtazapine and memantine may prove beneficial for augmentation of clozapine in non/partial responders to monotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":10420,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience","volume":"22 2","pages":"232-252"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11024692/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Augmentation Strategies for Partial or Non-responders to Clozapine in Patients with Schizophrenia: A Bayesian Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Archana Mishra, Rituparna Maiti, Biswa Ranjan Mishra, Anand Srinivasan\",\"doi\":\"10.9758/cpn.23.1119\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Clozapine is the only approved drug for treatment-resistant schizophrenia, but the response to the drug is often inadequate. Augmentation with other antipsychotics, anticonvulsants, and antidepressants is recommended for such patients, but there is a lack of evidence regarding the most effective therapy. This network meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of pharmacological agents used in the augmentation strategies in patients who were partial/ non-responders to clozapine. Relevant data were extracted from 30 randomized controlled trials through searches of electronic databases (MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, clinical trial registries). PRISMA guidelines were followed for the extraction, management, analysis, and reporting of the data. The outcome measure in this study was a reduction in symptom severity according to total PANSS/BPRS and was reported as the standardized mean difference with a 95% credible interval. Bayesian network meta-analysis with random effects model and uninformative priors was conducted, and the ranking probability of each intervention was done. Meta-regression was done to assess the effect of duration on the reduction in symptom severity scores. Mirtazapine (-5.2 [95%CrI: -7.7, -2.7]) and memantine (-2.1 [95%CrI: -4.0, -0.19]] were more efficacious than placebo for augmentation of clozapine in partial/non-responders and were the most effective adjunctive agents as per SUCRA scores. Both drugs did not cause a significant increase in frequency of adverse events compared to placebo. There was a significant effect of duration on the reduction in symptom severity. There was no evident publication bias. Mirtazapine and memantine may prove beneficial for augmentation of clozapine in non/partial responders to monotherapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10420,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"22 2\",\"pages\":\"232-252\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11024692/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9758/cpn.23.1119\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/11/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9758/cpn.23.1119","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

氯氮平是唯一获准用于治疗耐药性精神分裂症的药物,但对该药物的反应往往不充分。建议此类患者使用其他抗精神病药、抗惊厥药和抗抑郁药进行增效治疗,但关于最有效的疗法尚缺乏证据。本网络荟萃分析旨在评估氯氮平部分或无应答患者的增效策略中所用药物的疗效。通过检索电子数据库(MEDLINE/PubMed、Embase、Cochrane、临床试验登记处),从30项随机对照试验中提取了相关数据。数据的提取、管理、分析和报告均遵循 PRISMA 指南。本研究的结果测量指标是根据 PANSS/BPRS 总分得出的症状严重程度的减轻程度,并以标准化平均差和 95% 可信区间进行报告。采用随机效应模型和无信息先验进行了贝叶斯网络荟萃分析,并对每种干预措施进行了概率排序。元回归评估了持续时间对症状严重程度评分降低的影响。与安慰剂相比,米氮平(-5.2 [95%CrI: -7.7, -2.7])和美金刚(-2.1 [95%CrI: -4.0, -0.19])在部分/无应答者中增强氯氮平的疗效更好,并且是根据 SUCRA 评分最有效的辅助药物。与安慰剂相比,两种药物都不会导致不良反应频率的显著增加。持续时间对症状严重程度的减轻有明显影响。没有明显的出版偏差。米氮平和美金刚可能会被证明对单药治疗无反应/部分反应的氯氮平患者有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Augmentation Strategies for Partial or Non-responders to Clozapine in Patients with Schizophrenia: A Bayesian Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Clozapine is the only approved drug for treatment-resistant schizophrenia, but the response to the drug is often inadequate. Augmentation with other antipsychotics, anticonvulsants, and antidepressants is recommended for such patients, but there is a lack of evidence regarding the most effective therapy. This network meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of pharmacological agents used in the augmentation strategies in patients who were partial/ non-responders to clozapine. Relevant data were extracted from 30 randomized controlled trials through searches of electronic databases (MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, clinical trial registries). PRISMA guidelines were followed for the extraction, management, analysis, and reporting of the data. The outcome measure in this study was a reduction in symptom severity according to total PANSS/BPRS and was reported as the standardized mean difference with a 95% credible interval. Bayesian network meta-analysis with random effects model and uninformative priors was conducted, and the ranking probability of each intervention was done. Meta-regression was done to assess the effect of duration on the reduction in symptom severity scores. Mirtazapine (-5.2 [95%CrI: -7.7, -2.7]) and memantine (-2.1 [95%CrI: -4.0, -0.19]] were more efficacious than placebo for augmentation of clozapine in partial/non-responders and were the most effective adjunctive agents as per SUCRA scores. Both drugs did not cause a significant increase in frequency of adverse events compared to placebo. There was a significant effect of duration on the reduction in symptom severity. There was no evident publication bias. Mirtazapine and memantine may prove beneficial for augmentation of clozapine in non/partial responders to monotherapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience
Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience NEUROSCIENCESPHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience (Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci) launched in 2003, is the official journal of The Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology (KCNP), and the associate journal for Asian College of Neuropsychopharmacology (AsCNP). This journal aims to publish evidence-based, scientifically written articles related to clinical and preclinical studies in the field of psychopharmacology and neuroscience. This journal intends to foster and encourage communications between psychiatrist, neuroscientist and all related experts in Asia as well as worldwide. It is published four times a year at the last day of February, May, August, and November.
期刊最新文献
Clinical Reasoning in the Use of Long-acting Aripiprazole in Psychosis in Bilateral Nephrectomy on Hemodialysis. Enhancing the Understanding of Anti-calcitonin Gene-related Peptide Monoclonal Antibodies in Chronic Migraine Prevention. Psychometric Properties of Korean Version of Nonsuicidal Self-injury Inventory: Validation Study of Deliberate Self-harm Inventory. Psychosomatics: Communication of the Central Nervous System through Connection to Tissues, Organs, and Cells. Remembering Chae Won Kim, Pioneer of Psychopharmacology in Korea.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1