加拿大功能磁共振成像用于癫痫患者语言侧位的实践和建议。

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences Pub Date : 2024-04-04 DOI:10.1017/cjn.2024.56
Madeleine R Falby, Donald C Brien, Lysa Boissé Lomax, Garima Shukla, Gavin P Winston
{"title":"加拿大功能磁共振成像用于癫痫患者语言侧位的实践和建议。","authors":"Madeleine R Falby, Donald C Brien, Lysa Boissé Lomax, Garima Shukla, Gavin P Winston","doi":"10.1017/cjn.2024.56","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objective: </strong>Identifying a patient's dominant language hemisphere is an important evaluation performed prior to epilepsy surgery and is commonly assessed using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). However, the lack of standardization and resultant heterogeneity of fMRI paradigms used in clinical practice limits the ability of cross-center comparisons to be made regarding language laterality results.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Through surveying Canadian Epilepsy Centres in combination with reviewing supporting literature, current fMRI language lateralization practices for the clinical evaluation of patients with epilepsy were assessed. To encourage standardization of this practice, we outlined a two-part paradigm series that demonstrates widespread acceptance, reliability and accessibility in lateralizing various aspects of language functioning in individuals with average or near-average IQ and normal literacy skills.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The collected data confirm a lack of standardization in fMRI laterality assessments leading to clinical heterogeneity in stimulation and control tasks, paradigm design and timing, laterality index calculations, thresholding values and analysis software and technique. We suggest a Sentence Completion (SC) and Word Generation (WG) paradigm series as it was most commonly employed across Canada, demonstrated reliability in lateralizing both receptive and expressive language areas in supporting literature, and could be readily intelligible to an inclusive population.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Through providing recommendations for a two-part paradigm series, we hope to contribute to the standardization of this practice across Canada to reduce clinical heterogeneity, encourage communicability between institutions, and enhance methodologies for the surgical treatment of epilepsy for the benefit of all individuals living with epilepsy in Canada.</p>","PeriodicalId":56134,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Canadian Practice and Recommendations on Functional MRI to Lateralize Language in Epilepsy.\",\"authors\":\"Madeleine R Falby, Donald C Brien, Lysa Boissé Lomax, Garima Shukla, Gavin P Winston\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/cjn.2024.56\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/objective: </strong>Identifying a patient's dominant language hemisphere is an important evaluation performed prior to epilepsy surgery and is commonly assessed using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). However, the lack of standardization and resultant heterogeneity of fMRI paradigms used in clinical practice limits the ability of cross-center comparisons to be made regarding language laterality results.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Through surveying Canadian Epilepsy Centres in combination with reviewing supporting literature, current fMRI language lateralization practices for the clinical evaluation of patients with epilepsy were assessed. To encourage standardization of this practice, we outlined a two-part paradigm series that demonstrates widespread acceptance, reliability and accessibility in lateralizing various aspects of language functioning in individuals with average or near-average IQ and normal literacy skills.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The collected data confirm a lack of standardization in fMRI laterality assessments leading to clinical heterogeneity in stimulation and control tasks, paradigm design and timing, laterality index calculations, thresholding values and analysis software and technique. We suggest a Sentence Completion (SC) and Word Generation (WG) paradigm series as it was most commonly employed across Canada, demonstrated reliability in lateralizing both receptive and expressive language areas in supporting literature, and could be readily intelligible to an inclusive population.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Through providing recommendations for a two-part paradigm series, we hope to contribute to the standardization of this practice across Canada to reduce clinical heterogeneity, encourage communicability between institutions, and enhance methodologies for the surgical treatment of epilepsy for the benefit of all individuals living with epilepsy in Canada.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56134,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2024.56\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2024.56","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:确定患者的优势语言半球是癫痫手术前的一项重要评估,通常使用功能磁共振成像(fMRI)进行评估。然而,由于临床实践中使用的 fMRI 范式缺乏标准化,导致其异质性,从而限制了就语言侧位结果进行跨中心比较的能力:方法:通过对加拿大癫痫中心进行调查并查阅相关文献,评估了目前用于癫痫患者临床评估的 fMRI 语言侧位实践。为了鼓励这种做法的标准化,我们概述了一个由两部分组成的范式系列,该范式在对智商达到平均水平或接近平均水平、读写能力正常的个体进行语言功能各方面的侧向化时,显示出广泛的可接受性、可靠性和可操作性:收集到的数据证实,fMRI 侧向性评估缺乏标准化,导致刺激和控制任务、范式设计和时间安排、侧向性指数计算、阈值以及分析软件和技术等方面存在临床异质性。我们建议采用句子完成(SC)和单词生成(WG)范式系列,因为它是加拿大最常用的范式,在支持性文献中证明了接受性和表达性语言区域侧向化的可靠性,并且易于被包容性人群理解:我们希望通过提供关于两部分范式系列的建议,促进加拿大范围内这一做法的标准化,以减少临床异质性,鼓励机构间的交流,并加强癫痫外科治疗的方法,使加拿大所有癫痫患者受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Canadian Practice and Recommendations on Functional MRI to Lateralize Language in Epilepsy.

Background/objective: Identifying a patient's dominant language hemisphere is an important evaluation performed prior to epilepsy surgery and is commonly assessed using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). However, the lack of standardization and resultant heterogeneity of fMRI paradigms used in clinical practice limits the ability of cross-center comparisons to be made regarding language laterality results.

Methods: Through surveying Canadian Epilepsy Centres in combination with reviewing supporting literature, current fMRI language lateralization practices for the clinical evaluation of patients with epilepsy were assessed. To encourage standardization of this practice, we outlined a two-part paradigm series that demonstrates widespread acceptance, reliability and accessibility in lateralizing various aspects of language functioning in individuals with average or near-average IQ and normal literacy skills.

Results: The collected data confirm a lack of standardization in fMRI laterality assessments leading to clinical heterogeneity in stimulation and control tasks, paradigm design and timing, laterality index calculations, thresholding values and analysis software and technique. We suggest a Sentence Completion (SC) and Word Generation (WG) paradigm series as it was most commonly employed across Canada, demonstrated reliability in lateralizing both receptive and expressive language areas in supporting literature, and could be readily intelligible to an inclusive population.

Conclusion: Through providing recommendations for a two-part paradigm series, we hope to contribute to the standardization of this practice across Canada to reduce clinical heterogeneity, encourage communicability between institutions, and enhance methodologies for the surgical treatment of epilepsy for the benefit of all individuals living with epilepsy in Canada.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.30%
发文量
330
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation The Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences is the official publication of the four member societies of the Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation -- Canadian Neurological Society (CNS), Canadian Association of Child Neurology (CACN), Canadian Neurosurgical Society (CNSS), Canadian Society of Clinical Neurophysiologists (CSCN). The Journal is a widely circulated internationally recognized medical journal that publishes peer-reviewed articles. The Journal is published in January, March, May, July, September, and November in an online only format. The first Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences (the Journal) was published in 1974 in Winnipeg. In 1981, the Journal became the official publication of the member societies of the CNSF.
期刊最新文献
Sex Differences in Moderate-to-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Randomized Controlled Trials. Updated Canadian Headache Society Migraine Prevention Guideline with Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. A Look Back on the History of Cerebral Revascularization for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Neurosurgeon's Perspective. Analysis of Clinical Utility of Functional MRI in Neurosurgical Decision-Making in Focal Epilepsy. The Effect of After-Hours Resection on the Outcomes in Patients with High-Grade Gliomas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1