会阴裂伤的发生率及相关因素:利用 2011 年和 2012 年巴西 Nascer 调查数据进行的横断面研究。

IF 2.5 Q1 Multidisciplinary Epidemiologia e Servicos de Saude Pub Date : 2024-04-05 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1590/S2237-96222024V33E2023621.EN
Luciana Mamede, Daniele Marano, Marcos Augusto Bastos Dias, Paulo Roberto Borges de Souza Junior
{"title":"会阴裂伤的发生率及相关因素:利用 2011 年和 2012 年巴西 Nascer 调查数据进行的横断面研究。","authors":"Luciana Mamede, Daniele Marano, Marcos Augusto Bastos Dias, Paulo Roberto Borges de Souza Junior","doi":"10.1590/S2237-96222024V33E2023621.EN","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the prevalence of perineal laceration, based on the self-reported perception of postpartum women, and to analyze factors associated with its occurrence in Brazil.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a cross-sectional study conducted with 23,894 postpartum women, excluding twin pregnancies, cesarean sections, and births with episiotomies, between 2011 and 2012. Prevalence ratios (PR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) of association between the event and maternal, fetus/newborn, obstetric and clinical management characteristics were estimated in hierarchical Poisson regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 4,606 postpartum women, 49.5% (95%CI 46.1;42.9) self-reported perineal laceration. Being an adolescent (PR = 1.12; 95%CI 1.02;1.25), primipara (PR = 1.47; 95%CI 1.33;1.63), having had excessive gestational weight gain (PR = 1.17; 95%CI 1.07;1.29) and having undergone the Kristeller maneuver (PR = 1.18; 95%CI 1.08;1.29) increased the proportion of the outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results found call for prenatal care and adjustments to childbirth care so as to be in accordance with current recommendations.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>Prevalence of self-reported perineal laceration was 49.5%. Being in the adolescent age group, primiparity, excessive gestational weight and the Kristeller maneuver were risk factors associated with the event.</p><p><strong>Implications for services: </strong>Studying self-reported prevalence of perineal laceration supports new care practices, highlights the prevention of risk factors considered modifiable and confirms the need to follow current guidelines.</p><p><strong>Perspectives: </strong>New national studies are needed comparing prevalence of self-reported perineal laceration with that recorded in medical records in order to support care practices and public obstetric policies.</p>","PeriodicalId":51473,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiologia e Servicos de Saude","volume":"33 ","pages":"e2023621"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11000781/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence and factors associated with the perception of perineal laceration: a cross-sectional study with data from the Nascer no Brasil Survey, 2011 and 2012.\",\"authors\":\"Luciana Mamede, Daniele Marano, Marcos Augusto Bastos Dias, Paulo Roberto Borges de Souza Junior\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/S2237-96222024V33E2023621.EN\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the prevalence of perineal laceration, based on the self-reported perception of postpartum women, and to analyze factors associated with its occurrence in Brazil.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a cross-sectional study conducted with 23,894 postpartum women, excluding twin pregnancies, cesarean sections, and births with episiotomies, between 2011 and 2012. Prevalence ratios (PR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) of association between the event and maternal, fetus/newborn, obstetric and clinical management characteristics were estimated in hierarchical Poisson regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 4,606 postpartum women, 49.5% (95%CI 46.1;42.9) self-reported perineal laceration. Being an adolescent (PR = 1.12; 95%CI 1.02;1.25), primipara (PR = 1.47; 95%CI 1.33;1.63), having had excessive gestational weight gain (PR = 1.17; 95%CI 1.07;1.29) and having undergone the Kristeller maneuver (PR = 1.18; 95%CI 1.08;1.29) increased the proportion of the outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results found call for prenatal care and adjustments to childbirth care so as to be in accordance with current recommendations.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>Prevalence of self-reported perineal laceration was 49.5%. Being in the adolescent age group, primiparity, excessive gestational weight and the Kristeller maneuver were risk factors associated with the event.</p><p><strong>Implications for services: </strong>Studying self-reported prevalence of perineal laceration supports new care practices, highlights the prevention of risk factors considered modifiable and confirms the need to follow current guidelines.</p><p><strong>Perspectives: </strong>New national studies are needed comparing prevalence of self-reported perineal laceration with that recorded in medical records in order to support care practices and public obstetric policies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51473,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epidemiologia e Servicos de Saude\",\"volume\":\"33 \",\"pages\":\"e2023621\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11000781/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epidemiologia e Servicos de Saude\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/S2237-96222024V33E2023621.EN\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Multidisciplinary\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiologia e Servicos de Saude","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S2237-96222024V33E2023621.EN","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的根据产后妇女的自我报告,描述会阴裂伤的发生率,并分析巴西发生会阴裂伤的相关因素:这是一项横断面研究,在 2011 年至 2012 年间对 23894 名产后妇女进行了调查,其中不包括双胎妊娠、剖宫产和使用外阴切开术的分娩。在分层泊松回归模型中估算了事件与产妇、胎儿/新生儿、产科和临床管理特征之间的患病率(PR)和95%置信区间(95%CI):在 4 606 名产后妇女中,49.5%(95%CI 46.1;42.9)的妇女自述会阴裂伤。青少年(PR = 1.12; 95%CI 1.02;1.25)、初产妇(PR = 1.47; 95%CI 1.33;1.63)、妊娠体重增加过多(PR = 1.17; 95%CI 1.07;1.29)和接受过克里斯特勒手法(PR = 1.18; 95%CI 1.08;1.29)会增加出现这种结果的比例:主要结果:产前护理和分娩护理的调整应符合当前的建议:主要结果:自我报告的会阴裂伤发生率为 49.5%。青少年年龄组、初产妇、妊娠体重过大和克里斯特勒手法是与该事件相关的风险因素:对服务的启示:对会阴裂伤发生率的自我报告研究支持了新的护理实践,强调了预防被认为是可以改变的风险因素,并证实了遵循现行指南的必要性:需要开展新的全国性研究,比较自我报告的会阴裂伤发生率和医疗记录中记录的发生率,以支持护理实践和公共产科政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prevalence and factors associated with the perception of perineal laceration: a cross-sectional study with data from the Nascer no Brasil Survey, 2011 and 2012.

Objective: To describe the prevalence of perineal laceration, based on the self-reported perception of postpartum women, and to analyze factors associated with its occurrence in Brazil.

Methods: This was a cross-sectional study conducted with 23,894 postpartum women, excluding twin pregnancies, cesarean sections, and births with episiotomies, between 2011 and 2012. Prevalence ratios (PR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) of association between the event and maternal, fetus/newborn, obstetric and clinical management characteristics were estimated in hierarchical Poisson regression models.

Results: Out of 4,606 postpartum women, 49.5% (95%CI 46.1;42.9) self-reported perineal laceration. Being an adolescent (PR = 1.12; 95%CI 1.02;1.25), primipara (PR = 1.47; 95%CI 1.33;1.63), having had excessive gestational weight gain (PR = 1.17; 95%CI 1.07;1.29) and having undergone the Kristeller maneuver (PR = 1.18; 95%CI 1.08;1.29) increased the proportion of the outcome.

Conclusion: The results found call for prenatal care and adjustments to childbirth care so as to be in accordance with current recommendations.

Main results: Prevalence of self-reported perineal laceration was 49.5%. Being in the adolescent age group, primiparity, excessive gestational weight and the Kristeller maneuver were risk factors associated with the event.

Implications for services: Studying self-reported prevalence of perineal laceration supports new care practices, highlights the prevention of risk factors considered modifiable and confirms the need to follow current guidelines.

Perspectives: New national studies are needed comparing prevalence of self-reported perineal laceration with that recorded in medical records in order to support care practices and public obstetric policies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Epidemiologia e Servicos de Saude
Epidemiologia e Servicos de Saude PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
88
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊最新文献
Factors associated with deaths by tuberculosis in the state of Mato Grosso, 2011-2020: retrospective cohort study. Use and filling out of the child health booklet among beneficiaries of the Bolsa Família Program in Salvador-Bahia, Brazil: a cross-sectional study, 2023. Food insecurity, nutritional status and socioeconomic factors in the transgender population: a cross-sectional study in the Metropolitan Region of Baixada Santista, Brazil, 2023. Where are the trans masculinities in the SUS? Sociodemographic and access profile of trans men and transmasculine individuals linked to the Transgender Outpatient Clinic in Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul state, Brazil, 2019-2021. Complete vaccination coverage of children born in 2017-2018, living in urban areas of state capitals and in 12 inland cities in Brazil: a population-based survey from a retrospective cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1