考夫曼儿童评估测验(II)如何经受临床实践的考验?Befunde bei 7- bis 12-jährigen Kindern / How Does the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children-II Stand the Test of Clinical Practice?7至12岁儿童的调查结果。

IF 0.4 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY Praxis Der Kinderpsychologie Und Kinderpsychiatrie Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.13109/prkk.2024.73.3.253
Gerolf Renner, Anne Schroeder, Dieter Irblich
{"title":"考夫曼儿童评估测验(II)如何经受临床实践的考验?Befunde bei 7- bis 12-jährigen Kindern / How Does the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children-II Stand the Test of Clinical Practice?7至12岁儿童的调查结果。","authors":"Gerolf Renner, Anne Schroeder, Dieter Irblich","doi":"10.13109/prkk.2024.73.3.253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>How Does the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children-II Stand the Test of Clinical Practice? Findings in 7- To 12-Year-Old Children Reliability and validity of the KABC-II were investigated in 646 children aged 7 to 12 years who had been assessed in four social pediatric centers and one pediatric clinic in Germany due to developmental, behavioral, or emotional disorders.The reliability of the global scales Fluid-Crystallized-Index (FCI) and Mental Processing Index (MPI) proved to be very high in all age groups, with values ≥ .96. Reliability values for the scales were above .85 for Sequential/ Gsm and Delayed Recall, and above .90 for the other scales. Relatively higher test scores were found for Learning/Glr in children with intellectual disability than in other scales. Findings for discriminative validity for clinical diagnostic groups and educational backgrounds were as expected, with the lowest intelligence scores for children with intellectual disabilities.The correlation between FCI and the full scale IQ of the SON-R 2.-7 was .73 in a longitudinal subsample. Divergent validity for behavioral variables was confirmed in a subsample by low and nonsignificant correlations with the CBCL/6-18R. With some limitations, psychometric data indicate the suitability of the KABC-II for individual clinical assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":45178,"journal":{"name":"Praxis Der Kinderpsychologie Und Kinderpsychiatrie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wie bewährt sich die Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children-II in der klinischen Anwendungspraxis? Befunde bei 7- bis 12-jährigen Kindern / How Does the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children-II Stand the Test of Clinical Practice? Findings in 7- To 12-Year-Old Children.\",\"authors\":\"Gerolf Renner, Anne Schroeder, Dieter Irblich\",\"doi\":\"10.13109/prkk.2024.73.3.253\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>How Does the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children-II Stand the Test of Clinical Practice? Findings in 7- To 12-Year-Old Children Reliability and validity of the KABC-II were investigated in 646 children aged 7 to 12 years who had been assessed in four social pediatric centers and one pediatric clinic in Germany due to developmental, behavioral, or emotional disorders.The reliability of the global scales Fluid-Crystallized-Index (FCI) and Mental Processing Index (MPI) proved to be very high in all age groups, with values ≥ .96. Reliability values for the scales were above .85 for Sequential/ Gsm and Delayed Recall, and above .90 for the other scales. Relatively higher test scores were found for Learning/Glr in children with intellectual disability than in other scales. Findings for discriminative validity for clinical diagnostic groups and educational backgrounds were as expected, with the lowest intelligence scores for children with intellectual disabilities.The correlation between FCI and the full scale IQ of the SON-R 2.-7 was .73 in a longitudinal subsample. Divergent validity for behavioral variables was confirmed in a subsample by low and nonsignificant correlations with the CBCL/6-18R. With some limitations, psychometric data indicate the suitability of the KABC-II for individual clinical assessment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45178,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Praxis Der Kinderpsychologie Und Kinderpsychiatrie\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Praxis Der Kinderpsychologie Und Kinderpsychiatrie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13109/prkk.2024.73.3.253\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Praxis Der Kinderpsychologie Und Kinderpsychiatrie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13109/prkk.2024.73.3.253","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

考夫曼儿童评估测验-II 如何经受临床实践的考验?对德国四家社会儿科中心和一家儿科诊所的 646 名因发育、行为或情绪障碍而接受评估的 7 至 12 岁儿童进行了 KABC-II 的信度和效度调查。事实证明,在所有年龄组中,总体量表流体-结晶-指数(FCI)和心理处理指数(MPI)的信度都非常高,值均≥.96。各量表的信度值中,顺序/Gsm 和延迟回忆的信度值均高于 0.85,其他量表的信度值均高于 0.90。与其他量表相比,智障儿童的学习/语言测试得分相对较高。在一个纵向子样本中,FCI 与 SON-R 2.-7 全量表智商之间的相关性为 0.73。在一个子样本中,行为变量的发散有效性通过与 CBCL/6-18R 的低相关性和非显著相关性得到了证实。尽管存在一些局限性,但心理测量数据表明 KABC-II 适用于个体临床评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Wie bewährt sich die Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children-II in der klinischen Anwendungspraxis? Befunde bei 7- bis 12-jährigen Kindern / How Does the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children-II Stand the Test of Clinical Practice? Findings in 7- To 12-Year-Old Children.

How Does the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children-II Stand the Test of Clinical Practice? Findings in 7- To 12-Year-Old Children Reliability and validity of the KABC-II were investigated in 646 children aged 7 to 12 years who had been assessed in four social pediatric centers and one pediatric clinic in Germany due to developmental, behavioral, or emotional disorders.The reliability of the global scales Fluid-Crystallized-Index (FCI) and Mental Processing Index (MPI) proved to be very high in all age groups, with values ≥ .96. Reliability values for the scales were above .85 for Sequential/ Gsm and Delayed Recall, and above .90 for the other scales. Relatively higher test scores were found for Learning/Glr in children with intellectual disability than in other scales. Findings for discriminative validity for clinical diagnostic groups and educational backgrounds were as expected, with the lowest intelligence scores for children with intellectual disabilities.The correlation between FCI and the full scale IQ of the SON-R 2.-7 was .73 in a longitudinal subsample. Divergent validity for behavioral variables was confirmed in a subsample by low and nonsignificant correlations with the CBCL/6-18R. With some limitations, psychometric data indicate the suitability of the KABC-II for individual clinical assessment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
66
期刊介绍: Beiträge aus Praxis und Forschung, die sich mit Störungen der Entwicklung von Kindern und Jugendlichen sowie deren psychotherapeutischer Behandlung beschäftigen.
期刊最新文献
AUTORINNEN UND AUTOREN. BUCHBESPRECHUNGEN. Inhalt. Originalarbeiten / Original Articles. Die Behandlung von Kindern und Jugendlichen mit substanzbezogenen Störungen im deutschen Gesundheitssystem – eine Quantitative Studie. Originalarbeiten / Original Articles. Die partizipative, berufsgruppen- und abteilungsübergreifende Entwicklung eines Ethik- Leitbildes in einer kinder- und jugendpsychiatrischen Klinik: Der Ethik-Kompass der UPKKJ Basel.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1