[德国慢性鼻炎伴鼻息肉治疗现状调查结果]。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Laryngo-rhino-otologie Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-02 DOI:10.1055/a-2246-2793
Eric Deuss, Sven Becker, Moritz Meyer, Timon Hussain, Jonas Eckrich, Stephan Lang, Ludger Klimek, Benjamin Ernst
{"title":"[德国慢性鼻炎伴鼻息肉治疗现状调查结果]。","authors":"Eric Deuss, Sven Becker, Moritz Meyer, Timon Hussain, Jonas Eckrich, Stephan Lang, Ludger Klimek, Benjamin Ernst","doi":"10.1055/a-2246-2793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>With a prevalence of 0.55% to 4%, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a relevant part of the daily work of German otolaryngologists. The aim of the questionnaire-based data collection was to assess the current treatment status of CRSwNP in Germany.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>For this purpose, 24 questions within an anonymized online questionnaire were sent to all German ENT departments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 160 contacted ENT departments, 50 participated in the survey (31.3%). Among these, 76% performed more than 100 sinus surgeries annually and 38% treated more than 50 patients with biologics. Saline irrigations (80%) and intranasal glucocorticoids (GCS, 96%) were the most common conservative therapies. Systemic GCSs (52%) and intranasal GCS irrigation (20%) were less common. 80% of departments used biologics in the therapy of CRSwNP with an overall preference for dupilumab (70%). For therapy of aspirin intolerance, biologics (52%) were preferred to aspirin desensitization (26%). Prior to treatment with biologics clinical workup included the nasal polyp score (90%), the SNOT-22 questionnaire (84%), surrogate markers of type 2 inflammation (60%-72%), and computer tomography (50%). Final treatment success was assessed after 24 weeks (50%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Mostly, the responding departments followed German and European recommendations for diagnosis and therapy of CRSwNP. Therapy with biologics is widely used. The value of preoperative systemic GCS and the frequent performance of CT before initiation of therapy with a biologic should be debated in regard to its currently widespread use.</p>","PeriodicalId":17965,"journal":{"name":"Laryngo-rhino-otologie","volume":" ","pages":"646-654"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Results of a survey on the current management of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps in Germany].\",\"authors\":\"Eric Deuss, Sven Becker, Moritz Meyer, Timon Hussain, Jonas Eckrich, Stephan Lang, Ludger Klimek, Benjamin Ernst\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2246-2793\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>With a prevalence of 0.55% to 4%, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a relevant part of the daily work of German otolaryngologists. The aim of the questionnaire-based data collection was to assess the current treatment status of CRSwNP in Germany.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>For this purpose, 24 questions within an anonymized online questionnaire were sent to all German ENT departments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 160 contacted ENT departments, 50 participated in the survey (31.3%). Among these, 76% performed more than 100 sinus surgeries annually and 38% treated more than 50 patients with biologics. Saline irrigations (80%) and intranasal glucocorticoids (GCS, 96%) were the most common conservative therapies. Systemic GCSs (52%) and intranasal GCS irrigation (20%) were less common. 80% of departments used biologics in the therapy of CRSwNP with an overall preference for dupilumab (70%). For therapy of aspirin intolerance, biologics (52%) were preferred to aspirin desensitization (26%). Prior to treatment with biologics clinical workup included the nasal polyp score (90%), the SNOT-22 questionnaire (84%), surrogate markers of type 2 inflammation (60%-72%), and computer tomography (50%). Final treatment success was assessed after 24 weeks (50%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Mostly, the responding departments followed German and European recommendations for diagnosis and therapy of CRSwNP. Therapy with biologics is widely used. The value of preoperative systemic GCS and the frequent performance of CT before initiation of therapy with a biologic should be debated in regard to its currently widespread use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17965,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Laryngo-rhino-otologie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"646-654\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Laryngo-rhino-otologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2246-2793\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/4/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laryngo-rhino-otologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2246-2793","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介慢性鼻炎伴鼻息肉(CRSwNP)的发病率为 0.55% 至 4%,是德国耳鼻喉科医生日常工作的重要组成部分。此次问卷调查的目的是评估德国目前CRSwNP的治疗状况:为此,我们向德国所有耳鼻喉科部门发送了一份匿名在线问卷,其中包含 24 个问题:结果:在联系的 160 家耳鼻喉科中,有 50 家参与了调查(31.3%)。其中,76%的耳鼻喉科每年进行的鼻窦手术超过 100 例,38%的耳鼻喉科使用生物制剂治疗的患者超过 50 例。盐水冲洗(80%)和鼻内糖皮质激素(GCS,96%)是最常见的保守疗法。系统性糖皮质激素(52%)和鼻内糖皮质激素冲洗(20%)则不太常见。80% 的科室在治疗 CRSwNP 时使用生物制剂,总体上倾向于使用 dupilumab(70%)。在治疗阿司匹林不耐受时,生物制剂(52%)比阿司匹林脱敏(26%)更受青睐。使用生物制剂治疗前的临床检查包括鼻息肉评分(90%)、SNOT-22 问卷(84%)、2 型炎症的代用指标(60%-72%)和计算机断层扫描(50%)。最终治疗成功率在 24 周后进行评估(50%):大多数受访部门都遵循了德国和欧洲关于 CRSwNP 诊断和治疗的建议。生物制剂治疗得到广泛应用。鉴于生物制剂目前的广泛应用,术前全身 GCS 的价值以及在开始使用生物制剂治疗前频繁进行 CT 检查的做法值得商榷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Results of a survey on the current management of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps in Germany].

Introduction: With a prevalence of 0.55% to 4%, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a relevant part of the daily work of German otolaryngologists. The aim of the questionnaire-based data collection was to assess the current treatment status of CRSwNP in Germany.

Material and methods: For this purpose, 24 questions within an anonymized online questionnaire were sent to all German ENT departments.

Results: Of 160 contacted ENT departments, 50 participated in the survey (31.3%). Among these, 76% performed more than 100 sinus surgeries annually and 38% treated more than 50 patients with biologics. Saline irrigations (80%) and intranasal glucocorticoids (GCS, 96%) were the most common conservative therapies. Systemic GCSs (52%) and intranasal GCS irrigation (20%) were less common. 80% of departments used biologics in the therapy of CRSwNP with an overall preference for dupilumab (70%). For therapy of aspirin intolerance, biologics (52%) were preferred to aspirin desensitization (26%). Prior to treatment with biologics clinical workup included the nasal polyp score (90%), the SNOT-22 questionnaire (84%), surrogate markers of type 2 inflammation (60%-72%), and computer tomography (50%). Final treatment success was assessed after 24 weeks (50%).

Conclusion: Mostly, the responding departments followed German and European recommendations for diagnosis and therapy of CRSwNP. Therapy with biologics is widely used. The value of preoperative systemic GCS and the frequent performance of CT before initiation of therapy with a biologic should be debated in regard to its currently widespread use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Laryngo-rhino-otologie
Laryngo-rhino-otologie 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
30.00%
发文量
1399
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Die Laryngo-Rhino-Otologie ist die deutschsprachige Fachzeitschrift für Ärzte in Klinik und Praxis mit Fokus auf die Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Heilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgie. Die Laryngo-Rhino-Otologie bringt die Themen, die Sie wirklich interessieren und in der täglichen Arbeit unterstützen: Kurze, leicht lesbare Beiträge, interessante Rubriken und Originalarbeiten mit Relevanz für Ihre Arbeit.
期刊最新文献
[An atypical medial canthal mass: a case of lacrimal sac inverted papilloma with literature review]. [Larynx Models in Voice Research and their Applications]. [Sinunasal surgery as outpatient procedure with special consideration of nasal packing - Position paper of the German Society of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, the working group Rhinology/Rhinosurgery (ARHIN) of the German Society of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery and German Professional Association of Otorhinolaryngologists]. [Survey on the use of nasal tamponades in sinunasal surgery]. [Ultrasound - part 5: closer look at sinus sonography].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1