比较全血和血浆在监测巨细胞病毒和 Epstein-Barr 病毒方面的作用。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 MICROBIOLOGY New Microbiologica Pub Date : 2024-05-01
Yuto Fukuda, Yuka Torii, Ken-Ichi Iwata, Kazunori Haruta, Makoto Yamaguchi, Takako Suzuki, Atsushi Narita, Hideki Muramatsu, Yasuhiro Ogura, Yoshiyuki Takahashi, Yoshinori Ito, Jun-Ichi Kawada
{"title":"比较全血和血浆在监测巨细胞病毒和 Epstein-Barr 病毒方面的作用。","authors":"Yuto Fukuda, Yuka Torii, Ken-Ichi Iwata, Kazunori Haruta, Makoto Yamaguchi, Takako Suzuki, Atsushi Narita, Hideki Muramatsu, Yasuhiro Ogura, Yoshiyuki Takahashi, Yoshinori Ito, Jun-Ichi Kawada","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Monitoring Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection after transplantation is recommended to enable preemptive therapy. However, the most suitable sample type remains unclear. Patients who underwent hematopoietic stem cell or liver transplantation were included in this study. Viral loads in sequential whole-blood and plasma samples were retrospectively analyzed. EBV DNA was detected more frequently in whole blood (55%) than in plasma (18%). The detection rate of CMV DNA was similar between the two sample types. The correlation of viral loads between the two sample types were 0.515 and 0.688 for EBV and CMV, respectively. Among paired samples in which EBV DNA was detected in whole blood, the plasma EBV detection rate was significantly higher in patients who underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation than in those who underwent liver transplantation. The viral DNA load in whole blood and plasma showed similar trends. The EBV detection rate was higher in whole blood, and a high correlation was observed between CMV DNA loads and whole blood and plasma. These results indicate that whole blood is more sensitive for monitoring both EBV and CMV, whereas plasma is a potential alternative sample for monitoring CMV.</p>","PeriodicalId":54723,"journal":{"name":"New Microbiologica","volume":"47 1","pages":"52-59"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Whole Blood and Plasma for Monitoring Cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr Virus.\",\"authors\":\"Yuto Fukuda, Yuka Torii, Ken-Ichi Iwata, Kazunori Haruta, Makoto Yamaguchi, Takako Suzuki, Atsushi Narita, Hideki Muramatsu, Yasuhiro Ogura, Yoshiyuki Takahashi, Yoshinori Ito, Jun-Ichi Kawada\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Monitoring Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection after transplantation is recommended to enable preemptive therapy. However, the most suitable sample type remains unclear. Patients who underwent hematopoietic stem cell or liver transplantation were included in this study. Viral loads in sequential whole-blood and plasma samples were retrospectively analyzed. EBV DNA was detected more frequently in whole blood (55%) than in plasma (18%). The detection rate of CMV DNA was similar between the two sample types. The correlation of viral loads between the two sample types were 0.515 and 0.688 for EBV and CMV, respectively. Among paired samples in which EBV DNA was detected in whole blood, the plasma EBV detection rate was significantly higher in patients who underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation than in those who underwent liver transplantation. The viral DNA load in whole blood and plasma showed similar trends. The EBV detection rate was higher in whole blood, and a high correlation was observed between CMV DNA loads and whole blood and plasma. These results indicate that whole blood is more sensitive for monitoring both EBV and CMV, whereas plasma is a potential alternative sample for monitoring CMV.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54723,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Microbiologica\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"52-59\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Microbiologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Microbiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

建议在移植后监测爱泼斯坦-巴氏病毒(EBV)和巨细胞病毒(CMV)感染,以便进行预防性治疗。然而,最合适的样本类型仍不明确。本研究纳入了接受造血干细胞或肝移植的患者。对连续全血和血浆样本中的病毒载量进行了回顾性分析。EBV DNA在全血中的检出率(55%)高于血浆(18%)。两种样本中 CMV DNA 的检出率相似。两种样本中 EBV 和 CMV 病毒载量的相关性分别为 0.515 和 0.688。在全血中检测到 EBV DNA 的配对样本中,造血干细胞移植患者的血浆 EBV 检测率明显高于肝移植患者。全血和血浆中的病毒 DNA 负载显示出相似的趋势。全血中的 EBV 检出率更高,CMV DNA 负载与全血和血浆之间存在高度相关性。这些结果表明,全血对监测 EBV 和 CMV 更为敏感,而血浆则是监测 CMV 的潜在替代样本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of Whole Blood and Plasma for Monitoring Cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr Virus.

Monitoring Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection after transplantation is recommended to enable preemptive therapy. However, the most suitable sample type remains unclear. Patients who underwent hematopoietic stem cell or liver transplantation were included in this study. Viral loads in sequential whole-blood and plasma samples were retrospectively analyzed. EBV DNA was detected more frequently in whole blood (55%) than in plasma (18%). The detection rate of CMV DNA was similar between the two sample types. The correlation of viral loads between the two sample types were 0.515 and 0.688 for EBV and CMV, respectively. Among paired samples in which EBV DNA was detected in whole blood, the plasma EBV detection rate was significantly higher in patients who underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation than in those who underwent liver transplantation. The viral DNA load in whole blood and plasma showed similar trends. The EBV detection rate was higher in whole blood, and a high correlation was observed between CMV DNA loads and whole blood and plasma. These results indicate that whole blood is more sensitive for monitoring both EBV and CMV, whereas plasma is a potential alternative sample for monitoring CMV.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
New Microbiologica
New Microbiologica 生物-微生物学
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
40
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The publication, diffusion and furtherance of research and study on all aspects of basic and clinical Microbiology and related fields are the chief aims of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Analysis of infection indicators and risk factors for influenza A after the COVID-19 pandemic. Clinical Pharmacology of the Single Tablet Regimen Bictegravir/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide in the evolving era of antiretroviral therapies. Comparison between rapid and laboratory serological tests in the context of the first responders during the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak: are the two tests interchangeable? Critical insights into the ocular surface microbiome: the need to standardize. Epidemiological characteristics and related risk factors of mixed infection in children with mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1