土耳其版老年谵妄信息员评估量表的有效性和可靠性。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Ideggyogyaszati Szemle-Clinical Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-03-30 DOI:10.18071/isz.77.0111
Buket Celik, Ozlem Bilik, Zeynep Deveci Koçbilek, Hale Turhan Damar, Didem Öz, Zeynep Denizmen
{"title":"土耳其版老年谵妄信息员评估量表的有效性和可靠性。","authors":"Buket Celik, Ozlem Bilik, Zeynep Deveci Koçbilek, Hale Turhan Damar, Didem Öz, Zeynep Denizmen","doi":"10.18071/isz.77.0111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong><p>Delirium is a common complication developing in el&shy;der&shy;ly patients. Therefore, it is important to diagnose delirium earlier. Family caregivers&nbsp;play an active role in early diagnosis of de&shy;lirium and build a bridge between health pro&shy;fessionals and patients. The purpose of this research was to achieve the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Informant Assessment of Geriatric Delirium Scale (I-AGeD).</p>.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong><p>This is a methodological study. The sample comprised 125 caregivers ac&shy;cepting to participate in the study and offering care to older patients with hip fracture aged &ge;60 years. Data were gathered preoperatively and on postoperative days 0, 1 and 2. After achieving the linguistic and content validity of the scale, the known-groups comparison was used to achieve its construct validity. The ROC curve analysis was made to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the scale. Item-total correlations, item analysis based on the difference between the upper 27% and lower 27%, Kuder&ndash;Richardson 20 (KR-20) coefficient and parallel forms reliability with the NEECHAM Confusion Scale were adapted to assess discriminant indices of the items in the I-AGeD.</p>.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong><p>The item-total correlation coeffi&shy;cients of the scale ranged from 0.54 to 0.89 and KR-20 coefficient ranged from 0.09 to 0.91 depending on the measurement times. According to the ROC curve analysis, the sensitivity and specificity of the scale were &ge; 91% and &ge; 96% respectively. The parallel forms reliability analysis showed a highly significant, strong negative relation at each measurement between the I-AGeD and the NEECHAM Confusion Scale.&nbsp;</p>.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong><p>The I-AGeD is valid and reliable to diagnose delirium in older Turkish patients in perioperative processes.</p>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50394,"journal":{"name":"Ideggyogyaszati Szemle-Clinical Neuroscience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Informant Assessment of Geriatric Delirium Scale.\",\"authors\":\"Buket Celik, Ozlem Bilik, Zeynep Deveci Koçbilek, Hale Turhan Damar, Didem Öz, Zeynep Denizmen\",\"doi\":\"10.18071/isz.77.0111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong><p>Delirium is a common complication developing in el&shy;der&shy;ly patients. Therefore, it is important to diagnose delirium earlier. Family caregivers&nbsp;play an active role in early diagnosis of de&shy;lirium and build a bridge between health pro&shy;fessionals and patients. The purpose of this research was to achieve the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Informant Assessment of Geriatric Delirium Scale (I-AGeD).</p>.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong><p>This is a methodological study. The sample comprised 125 caregivers ac&shy;cepting to participate in the study and offering care to older patients with hip fracture aged &ge;60 years. Data were gathered preoperatively and on postoperative days 0, 1 and 2. After achieving the linguistic and content validity of the scale, the known-groups comparison was used to achieve its construct validity. The ROC curve analysis was made to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the scale. Item-total correlations, item analysis based on the difference between the upper 27% and lower 27%, Kuder&ndash;Richardson 20 (KR-20) coefficient and parallel forms reliability with the NEECHAM Confusion Scale were adapted to assess discriminant indices of the items in the I-AGeD.</p>.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong><p>The item-total correlation coeffi&shy;cients of the scale ranged from 0.54 to 0.89 and KR-20 coefficient ranged from 0.09 to 0.91 depending on the measurement times. According to the ROC curve analysis, the sensitivity and specificity of the scale were &ge; 91% and &ge; 96% respectively. The parallel forms reliability analysis showed a highly significant, strong negative relation at each measurement between the I-AGeD and the NEECHAM Confusion Scale.&nbsp;</p>.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong><p>The I-AGeD is valid and reliable to diagnose delirium in older Turkish patients in perioperative processes.</p>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50394,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ideggyogyaszati Szemle-Clinical Neuroscience\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ideggyogyaszati Szemle-Clinical Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18071/isz.77.0111\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ideggyogyaszati Szemle-Clinical Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18071/isz.77.0111","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:谵妄是el­der­ly 患者常见的并发症。因此,早期诊断谵妄非常重要。家庭护理人员在谵妄的早期诊断中发挥着积极的作用,是医护人员与患者之间沟通的桥梁。本研究的目的是验证土耳其版老年谵妄信息员评估量表(I-AGED)的有效性和可靠性:这是一项方法论研究。样本包括 125 名同意参与研究并为 60 岁髋部骨折老年患者提供护理的护理人员。数据收集于术前和术后第 0、1 和 2 天。在实现量表的语言和内容效度后,采用已知组比较法实现其构造效度。通过 ROC 曲线分析确定量表的灵敏度和特异性。为了评估 I-AGeD 中各题项的判别指数,采用了题项总相关、基于上 27% 和下 27% 差值的题项分析、Kuder–Richardson 20(KR-20)系数以及与 NEECHAM 混乱量表的平行形式信度:根据测量时间的不同,量表的项目-总相关系数在 0.54 至 0.89 之间,KR-20 系数在 0.09 至 0.91 之间。根据 ROC 曲线分析,量表的灵敏度和特异度分别为 91% 和 96%。平行形式信度分析表明,I-AGED与NEECHAM混淆量表在每次测量中都存在高度显著的强负相关:I-AGED对围术期土耳其老年患者的谵妄诊断有效且可靠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Informant Assessment of Geriatric Delirium Scale.

Background and purpose:

Delirium is a common complication developing in el­der­ly patients. Therefore, it is important to diagnose delirium earlier. Family caregivers play an active role in early diagnosis of de­lirium and build a bridge between health pro­fessionals and patients. The purpose of this research was to achieve the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Informant Assessment of Geriatric Delirium Scale (I-AGeD).

.

Methods:

This is a methodological study. The sample comprised 125 caregivers ac­cepting to participate in the study and offering care to older patients with hip fracture aged ≥60 years. Data were gathered preoperatively and on postoperative days 0, 1 and 2. After achieving the linguistic and content validity of the scale, the known-groups comparison was used to achieve its construct validity. The ROC curve analysis was made to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the scale. Item-total correlations, item analysis based on the difference between the upper 27% and lower 27%, Kuder–Richardson 20 (KR-20) coefficient and parallel forms reliability with the NEECHAM Confusion Scale were adapted to assess discriminant indices of the items in the I-AGeD.

.

Results:

The item-total correlation coeffi­cients of the scale ranged from 0.54 to 0.89 and KR-20 coefficient ranged from 0.09 to 0.91 depending on the measurement times. According to the ROC curve analysis, the sensitivity and specificity of the scale were ≥ 91% and ≥ 96% respectively. The parallel forms reliability analysis showed a highly significant, strong negative relation at each measurement between the I-AGeD and the NEECHAM Confusion Scale. 

.

Conclusion:

The I-AGeD is valid and reliable to diagnose delirium in older Turkish patients in perioperative processes.

.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ideggyogyaszati Szemle-Clinical Neuroscience
Ideggyogyaszati Szemle-Clinical Neuroscience CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of Clinical Neuroscience (Ideggyógyászati Szemle) is to provide a forum for the exchange of clinical and scientific information for a multidisciplinary community. The Clinical Neuroscience will be of primary interest to neurologists, neurosurgeons, psychiatrist and clinical specialized psycholigists, neuroradiologists and clinical neurophysiologists, but original works in basic or computer science, epidemiology, pharmacology, etc., relating to the clinical practice with involvement of the central nervous system are also welcome.
期刊最新文献
[Combined epilepsy with generalized and focal seizures]. [Quality of life in acute ischaemic stroke patients treated with recanalisation]. Effect of inflammatory response before mechanical thrombectomy on prognosis in stroke patients. Evaluating vertebrobasilar insufficiency and Meniere's disease: Insights from cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential and video head impulse test. Predictors of pneumonia in stroke patients with dysphagia: A Turkish study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1