多成分干预增加了因动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病住院后接受戒烟治疗的机会:随机试验。

European heart journal open Pub Date : 2024-04-08 eCollection Date: 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1093/ehjopen/oeae028
Karin Pleym, Toril Dammen, Harald Wedon-Fekjaer, Einar Husebye, Elise Sverre, Serena Tonstad, John Munkhaugen
{"title":"多成分干预增加了因动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病住院后接受戒烟治疗的机会:随机试验。","authors":"Karin Pleym, Toril Dammen, Harald Wedon-Fekjaer, Einar Husebye, Elise Sverre, Serena Tonstad, John Munkhaugen","doi":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeae028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To evaluate the effects of a multi-component intervention for smokers hospitalized for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) on the participation rate in community-based cessation programmes and the use of cessation drugs. Additionally, to explore the impact on the cessation rates at 6 months.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>A randomized parallel-group study was conducted at a Norwegian secondary care hospital in 2021. The intervention group was: (i) counselled using motivational interviewing techniques during hospitalization; (ii) given an information leaflet, detailing the cessation programme; and (iii) referred to the community-based smoking cessation treatment including a post-discharge pro-active telephone invitation. The control group received usual care and the same information leaflet containing clear contact details for initiating participation. Data were collected at baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months. Among 99 smokers hospitalized with ASCVD, 40 were excluded. Of 59 randomized patients, 4 were lost to follow-up and 55 completed the study. The mean age was 65.1 (standard deviation 9.3) years, 35% were female, and 88% had smoked >20 years. Co-morbidity was prevalent (mean Charlson score 4.8). The intervention group was more likely to participate in the smoking cessation treatment {48 vs. 7%, difference: 41% [95% confidence interval (CI): 14%, 63%]} and used cessation drugs more frequently [59 vs. 21%, difference: 38% (95% CI: 17%, 59%)]. At the 6 months point prevalence, we observed notable between-group differences in self-reported cessation rate (48 vs. 25%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The intervention significantly increased the participation rate at community-based smoking cessation programmes and the use of cessation drugs among multi-morbid smokers hospitalized for ASCVD.</p>","PeriodicalId":93995,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11044967/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A multi-component intervention increased access to smoking cessation treatment after hospitalization for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a randomized trial.\",\"authors\":\"Karin Pleym, Toril Dammen, Harald Wedon-Fekjaer, Einar Husebye, Elise Sverre, Serena Tonstad, John Munkhaugen\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ehjopen/oeae028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To evaluate the effects of a multi-component intervention for smokers hospitalized for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) on the participation rate in community-based cessation programmes and the use of cessation drugs. Additionally, to explore the impact on the cessation rates at 6 months.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>A randomized parallel-group study was conducted at a Norwegian secondary care hospital in 2021. The intervention group was: (i) counselled using motivational interviewing techniques during hospitalization; (ii) given an information leaflet, detailing the cessation programme; and (iii) referred to the community-based smoking cessation treatment including a post-discharge pro-active telephone invitation. The control group received usual care and the same information leaflet containing clear contact details for initiating participation. Data were collected at baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months. Among 99 smokers hospitalized with ASCVD, 40 were excluded. Of 59 randomized patients, 4 were lost to follow-up and 55 completed the study. The mean age was 65.1 (standard deviation 9.3) years, 35% were female, and 88% had smoked >20 years. Co-morbidity was prevalent (mean Charlson score 4.8). The intervention group was more likely to participate in the smoking cessation treatment {48 vs. 7%, difference: 41% [95% confidence interval (CI): 14%, 63%]} and used cessation drugs more frequently [59 vs. 21%, difference: 38% (95% CI: 17%, 59%)]. At the 6 months point prevalence, we observed notable between-group differences in self-reported cessation rate (48 vs. 25%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The intervention significantly increased the participation rate at community-based smoking cessation programmes and the use of cessation drugs among multi-morbid smokers hospitalized for ASCVD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93995,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European heart journal open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11044967/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European heart journal open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjopen/oeae028\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European heart journal open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjopen/oeae028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估针对因动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)住院的吸烟者采取的多成分干预措施对社区戒烟计划参与率和戒烟药物使用率的影响。此外,还探讨了对6个月戒烟率的影响:2021年,挪威一家二级医院开展了一项随机平行分组研究。干预组:(i) 在住院期间使用动机访谈技术进行咨询;(ii) 发放信息宣传单,详细介绍戒烟计划;(iii) 转介到社区戒烟治疗,包括出院后主动电话邀请。对照组接受常规护理和同样的信息宣传单,其中包含明确的联系方式,以便开始参与。在基线、1个月、3个月和6个月时收集数据。在因患 ASCVD 而住院的 99 名吸烟者中,有 40 人被排除在外。在 59 名随机患者中,4 人失去了随访机会,55 人完成了研究。患者平均年龄为 65.1 岁(标准差为 9.3),35% 为女性,88% 吸烟超过 20 年。共病现象普遍(平均 Charlson 评分 4.8)。干预组更有可能参加戒烟治疗{48%对7%,差异:41%[95%置信区间(95% 置信区间)]:41%[95%置信区间(CI):14%,63%]},并且更经常使用戒烟药物[59%对21%,差异:38%(95%CI:17%,59%)]。在 6 个月的点流行率中,我们观察到组间自我报告戒烟率的显著差异(48% 对 25%):干预措施大大提高了社区戒烟计划的参与率以及因患慢性心血管疾病住院的多病吸烟者的戒烟药物使用率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A multi-component intervention increased access to smoking cessation treatment after hospitalization for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a randomized trial.

Aims: To evaluate the effects of a multi-component intervention for smokers hospitalized for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) on the participation rate in community-based cessation programmes and the use of cessation drugs. Additionally, to explore the impact on the cessation rates at 6 months.

Methods and results: A randomized parallel-group study was conducted at a Norwegian secondary care hospital in 2021. The intervention group was: (i) counselled using motivational interviewing techniques during hospitalization; (ii) given an information leaflet, detailing the cessation programme; and (iii) referred to the community-based smoking cessation treatment including a post-discharge pro-active telephone invitation. The control group received usual care and the same information leaflet containing clear contact details for initiating participation. Data were collected at baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months. Among 99 smokers hospitalized with ASCVD, 40 were excluded. Of 59 randomized patients, 4 were lost to follow-up and 55 completed the study. The mean age was 65.1 (standard deviation 9.3) years, 35% were female, and 88% had smoked >20 years. Co-morbidity was prevalent (mean Charlson score 4.8). The intervention group was more likely to participate in the smoking cessation treatment {48 vs. 7%, difference: 41% [95% confidence interval (CI): 14%, 63%]} and used cessation drugs more frequently [59 vs. 21%, difference: 38% (95% CI: 17%, 59%)]. At the 6 months point prevalence, we observed notable between-group differences in self-reported cessation rate (48 vs. 25%).

Conclusion: The intervention significantly increased the participation rate at community-based smoking cessation programmes and the use of cessation drugs among multi-morbid smokers hospitalized for ASCVD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The incidence of atrial fibrillation detected by implantable loop recorders: a comparison between patients with and without embolic stroke of undetermined source. Intra-individual variability in lipoprotein(a): the value of a repeat measure for reclassifying individuals at intermediate risk. New data allow to better understand the secrets of lipoprotein(a): is that for sure? Correction to: Correlates and consequences of atrial fibrillation in a prospective study of 25 000 participants in the China Kadoorie Biobank. Colchicine for cardiovascular and limb risk reduction in Medicare beneficiaries with peripheral artery disease: emulation of target trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1