使用仰卧牵引 X 光片能否预测与 L5 融合的非行动不便的脑瘫患者术后的 Cobb 和骨盆偏斜矫正情况?一项病例系列研究。

IF 1.6 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Spine deformity Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-29 DOI:10.1007/s43390-024-00880-5
Ruben Alejandro Morales Ciancio, Jonathan Lucas, Stewart Tucker, Thomas Ember, Mark Harris, Edel Broomfield
{"title":"使用仰卧牵引 X 光片能否预测与 L5 融合的非行动不便的脑瘫患者术后的 Cobb 和骨盆偏斜矫正情况?一项病例系列研究。","authors":"Ruben Alejandro Morales Ciancio, Jonathan Lucas, Stewart Tucker, Thomas Ember, Mark Harris, Edel Broomfield","doi":"10.1007/s43390-024-00880-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to determine whether Cobb and pelvic obliquity corrections can be predicted using supine traction radiographs in patients with cerebral palsy (CP) who underwent posterior spinal fusion (PSF) from T2/3 to L5.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From January 2010 to January 2020, 167 non-ambulatory patients with CP scoliosis underwent PSF using pedicle screws in two quaternary centers with a minimum of 2 years follow-up (FU). Radiological measurements and chart reviews were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 106 patients aged 15.6 ± 0.4 years were included. All patients had significant correction of the Cobb angle (MC), pelvic obliquity (PO), thoracic kyphosis (TK), and lumbar lordosis (LL) without loss of correction at the last FU (LFU). Curve flexibility was significantly correlated with Cobb correction (δMC) immediately postoperatively (p < 0.0001, r = 0.8950), followed by the amount of correction in pelvic obliquity under traction (δPOT) (p = 0.0252, r = 0.2174). For correction in PO (δPO), the most significant variable was δPOT (p < 0.0001, r = 0.7553), followed by curve flexibility (p = 0.0059, r = 0.26) and the amount of correction in Cobb under traction (p = 0.0252, r = 0.2174).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cobb and PO corrections can be predicted using supine traction films for non-ambulatory CP patients treated with PSF from T2/3 to L5. The variables evaluated were interconnected, reinforcing preoperative planning for these patients. Comparative large-scale studies on patient-related clinical outcomes are required to determine whether this predicted correction is associated with improved surgical outcomes and reduced complication rates.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":21796,"journal":{"name":"Spine deformity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can postoperative Cobb and pelvic obliquity corrections be predicted using supine traction X-rays in non-ambulatory patients with cerebral palsy fused to L5? A case series study.\",\"authors\":\"Ruben Alejandro Morales Ciancio, Jonathan Lucas, Stewart Tucker, Thomas Ember, Mark Harris, Edel Broomfield\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43390-024-00880-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to determine whether Cobb and pelvic obliquity corrections can be predicted using supine traction radiographs in patients with cerebral palsy (CP) who underwent posterior spinal fusion (PSF) from T2/3 to L5.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From January 2010 to January 2020, 167 non-ambulatory patients with CP scoliosis underwent PSF using pedicle screws in two quaternary centers with a minimum of 2 years follow-up (FU). Radiological measurements and chart reviews were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 106 patients aged 15.6 ± 0.4 years were included. All patients had significant correction of the Cobb angle (MC), pelvic obliquity (PO), thoracic kyphosis (TK), and lumbar lordosis (LL) without loss of correction at the last FU (LFU). Curve flexibility was significantly correlated with Cobb correction (δMC) immediately postoperatively (p < 0.0001, r = 0.8950), followed by the amount of correction in pelvic obliquity under traction (δPOT) (p = 0.0252, r = 0.2174). For correction in PO (δPO), the most significant variable was δPOT (p < 0.0001, r = 0.7553), followed by curve flexibility (p = 0.0059, r = 0.26) and the amount of correction in Cobb under traction (p = 0.0252, r = 0.2174).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cobb and PO corrections can be predicted using supine traction films for non-ambulatory CP patients treated with PSF from T2/3 to L5. The variables evaluated were interconnected, reinforcing preoperative planning for these patients. Comparative large-scale studies on patient-related clinical outcomes are required to determine whether this predicted correction is associated with improved surgical outcomes and reduced complication rates.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spine deformity\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spine deformity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-024-00880-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/4/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine deformity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-024-00880-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在确定是否可以通过仰卧牵引X光片预测接受T2/3至L5脊柱后路融合术(PSF)的脑瘫(CP)患者的Cobb和骨盆倾斜矫正情况:方法:2010年1月至2020年1月,167名非行动不便的CP脊柱侧凸患者在两个四级中心接受了椎弓根螺钉后脊柱融合术,随访至少2年(FU)。结果:结果:共纳入 106 名患者,年龄为(15.6±0.4)岁。所有患者的Cobb角(MC)、骨盆偏斜(PO)、胸椎前凸(TK)和腰椎前凸(LL)均得到明显矫正,且在最后一次随访(LFU)时未失去矫正效果。曲线灵活性与术后即刻的 Cobb 矫正(δMC)有明显相关性(p < 0.0001,r = 0.8950),其次是牵引下骨盆倾斜的矫正量(δPOT)(p = 0.0252,r = 0.2174)。对于 PO 矫正量(δPO),最显著的变量是 δPOT(p < 0.0001,r = 0.7553),其次是曲线柔韧性(p = 0.0059,r = 0.26)和牵引下的 Cobb 矫正量(p = 0.0252,r = 0.2174):结论:使用仰卧牵引片可预测接受 PSF 治疗的 T2/3 至 L5 非卧床 CP 患者的 Cobb 和 PO 矫正情况。所评估的变量是相互关联的,从而加强了对这些患者的术前规划。需要对患者相关的临床结果进行大规模的比较研究,以确定这种预测矫正是否与手术结果的改善和并发症发生率的降低有关:证据等级:IV。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Can postoperative Cobb and pelvic obliquity corrections be predicted using supine traction X-rays in non-ambulatory patients with cerebral palsy fused to L5? A case series study.

Purpose: This study aimed to determine whether Cobb and pelvic obliquity corrections can be predicted using supine traction radiographs in patients with cerebral palsy (CP) who underwent posterior spinal fusion (PSF) from T2/3 to L5.

Methods: From January 2010 to January 2020, 167 non-ambulatory patients with CP scoliosis underwent PSF using pedicle screws in two quaternary centers with a minimum of 2 years follow-up (FU). Radiological measurements and chart reviews were performed.

Results: A total of 106 patients aged 15.6 ± 0.4 years were included. All patients had significant correction of the Cobb angle (MC), pelvic obliquity (PO), thoracic kyphosis (TK), and lumbar lordosis (LL) without loss of correction at the last FU (LFU). Curve flexibility was significantly correlated with Cobb correction (δMC) immediately postoperatively (p < 0.0001, r = 0.8950), followed by the amount of correction in pelvic obliquity under traction (δPOT) (p = 0.0252, r = 0.2174). For correction in PO (δPO), the most significant variable was δPOT (p < 0.0001, r = 0.7553), followed by curve flexibility (p = 0.0059, r = 0.26) and the amount of correction in Cobb under traction (p = 0.0252, r = 0.2174).

Conclusions: Cobb and PO corrections can be predicted using supine traction films for non-ambulatory CP patients treated with PSF from T2/3 to L5. The variables evaluated were interconnected, reinforcing preoperative planning for these patients. Comparative large-scale studies on patient-related clinical outcomes are required to determine whether this predicted correction is associated with improved surgical outcomes and reduced complication rates.

Level of evidence: IV.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
18.80%
发文量
167
期刊介绍: Spine Deformity the official journal of the?Scoliosis Research Society is a peer-refereed publication to disseminate knowledge on basic science and clinical research into the?etiology?biomechanics?treatment?methods and outcomes of all types of?spinal deformities. The international members of the Editorial Board provide a worldwide perspective for the journal's area of interest.The?journal?will enhance the mission of the Society which is to foster the optimal care of all patients with?spine?deformities worldwide. Articles published in?Spine Deformity?are Medline indexed in PubMed.? The journal publishes original articles in the form of clinical and basic research. Spine Deformity will only publish studies that have institutional review board (IRB) or similar ethics committee approval for human and animal studies and have strictly observed these guidelines. The minimum follow-up period for follow-up clinical studies is 24 months.
期刊最新文献
18th International Congress on Early Onset Scoliosis and the Growing Spine : November 13-15, 2024 Scottsdale, Arizona, USA. A team approach to improve outcomes in pediatric scoliosis surgery: a review of the current literature. Research trends of biomechanics in scoliosis from 1999 to 2023: a bibliometric analysis. Is the information provided by large language models valid in educating patients about adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? An evaluation of content, clarity, and empathy : The perspective of the European Spine Study Group. What imaging does my AIS patient need? A multi-group survey of provider preferences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1