透析动静脉通路远程监控技术。英国一家肾脏中心的回顾性评估。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Nephron Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-30 DOI:10.1159/000538820
Alshymaa Rafiek Eltahan, Zulfikar Pondor, Rosemary L Donne, David Lewis, Maharajan Raman, Paul Hinchliffe, Jan Cowperthwaite, Dimitrios Poulikakos
{"title":"透析动静脉通路远程监控技术。英国一家肾脏中心的回顾性评估。","authors":"Alshymaa Rafiek Eltahan, Zulfikar Pondor, Rosemary L Donne, David Lewis, Maharajan Raman, Paul Hinchliffe, Jan Cowperthwaite, Dimitrios Poulikakos","doi":"10.1159/000538820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early identification of dysfunctional arteriovenous haemodialysis (HD) vascular access (VA) is important for timely referral and intervention.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We retrospectively calculated VA risk score using Vasc-Alert surveillance software technology from HD treatment sessions in 2 satellite HD units over 18 months. We included in the analysis HD patients dialysing with arteriovenous fistula or graft (AVF/G) with available Vasc-Alert data for≥ 2 months. For group one (eventful) that included patients who developed vascular access thrombosis or stenosis over the study period, we collected Vasc-Alert risk score 2 months prior to the event and, for group two (uneventful), over 5 consecutive months. Vasc-Alert technology utilises routinely collected data during HD to calculate VA risk score and triggers an alert if the score is ≥7 in 3 consecutive dialysis sessions. Patients with &gt;2 alerts (vascular access score ≥7) per month were considered to have positive alerts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 140 HD patients, 81 patients dialysed via AVF/G. 77/81 had available Vasc-Alert data and were included in the final analysis. Out of 17 eventful patients, 11 (64.7%) had positive alerts 2 months prior to the vascular event. Out of the 60 patients without vascular events, 20 patients (33.3%) had positive alert. Vasc-Alert's sensitivity and specificity for vascular events were 64.7% and 66.6%, respectively. Within the 6 patients with thrombosed access, 2 patients (33.3%) detected by Vasc-Alert were not detected with clinical monitoring.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Vascular access risk score can be a useful non-invasive vascular access surveillance method to assist clinical decision making.</p>","PeriodicalId":18998,"journal":{"name":"Nephron","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11332309/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Remote Surveillance Technology of Dialysis Arteriovenous Access: Retrospective Evaluation in a UK Renal Centre.\",\"authors\":\"Alshymaa Rafiek Eltahan, Zulfikar Pondor, Rosemary L Donne, David Lewis, Maharajan Raman, Paul Hinchliffe, Jan Cowperthwaite, Dimitrios Poulikakos\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000538820\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early identification of dysfunctional arteriovenous haemodialysis (HD) vascular access (VA) is important for timely referral and intervention.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We retrospectively calculated VA risk score using Vasc-Alert surveillance software technology from HD treatment sessions in 2 satellite HD units over 18 months. We included in the analysis HD patients dialysing with arteriovenous fistula or graft (AVF/G) with available Vasc-Alert data for≥ 2 months. For group one (eventful) that included patients who developed vascular access thrombosis or stenosis over the study period, we collected Vasc-Alert risk score 2 months prior to the event and, for group two (uneventful), over 5 consecutive months. Vasc-Alert technology utilises routinely collected data during HD to calculate VA risk score and triggers an alert if the score is ≥7 in 3 consecutive dialysis sessions. Patients with &gt;2 alerts (vascular access score ≥7) per month were considered to have positive alerts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 140 HD patients, 81 patients dialysed via AVF/G. 77/81 had available Vasc-Alert data and were included in the final analysis. Out of 17 eventful patients, 11 (64.7%) had positive alerts 2 months prior to the vascular event. Out of the 60 patients without vascular events, 20 patients (33.3%) had positive alert. Vasc-Alert's sensitivity and specificity for vascular events were 64.7% and 66.6%, respectively. Within the 6 patients with thrombosed access, 2 patients (33.3%) detected by Vasc-Alert were not detected with clinical monitoring.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Vascular access risk score can be a useful non-invasive vascular access surveillance method to assist clinical decision making.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18998,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nephron\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11332309/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nephron\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000538820\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/4/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nephron","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000538820","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:早期发现动静脉血液透析(HD)血管通路(VA)功能障碍对于及时转诊和干预非常重要:方法:我们使用 Vasc-Alert 监控软件技术对两个卫星血液透析单位 18 个月内的血液透析治疗疗程进行了回顾性计算,得出了 VA 风险评分。我们将透析动静脉瘘或移植物(AVF/G)且 Vasc-Alert 数据可用时间≥ 2 个月的血液透析患者纳入分析范围。第一组(事件发生组)包括在研究期间发生血管通路血栓或狭窄的患者,我们收集了事件发生前 2 个月的 Vasc-Alert 风险评分,第二组(不发生组)收集了连续 5 个月的 Vasc-Alert 风险评分。Vasc-Alert 技术利用血液透析过程中常规收集的数据计算 VA 风险评分,如果连续 3 次透析过程中评分≥7,则触发警报。每月超过 2 次警报(血管通路评分≥7)的患者被视为阳性警报:结果:在 140 名血液透析患者中,有 81 名患者通过 AVF/G 进行透析。其中 77/81 例患者有可用的 Vasc-Alert 数据,并被纳入最终分析。在 17 例事件患者中,有 11 例(64.7%)在血管事件发生前 2 个月发出阳性警报。在 60 名未发生血管事件的患者中,有 20 名患者(33.3%)发出了阳性警报。Vasc-Alert 对血管事件的敏感性和特异性分别为 64.7% 和 66.6%。在 6 名血栓性入路患者中,Vasc-Alert 发现的 2 名患者(33.3%)在临床监测中未被发现:结论:血管通路风险评分是一种有用的非侵入性血管通路监测方法,有助于临床决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Remote Surveillance Technology of Dialysis Arteriovenous Access: Retrospective Evaluation in a UK Renal Centre.

Background: Early identification of dysfunctional arteriovenous haemodialysis (HD) vascular access (VA) is important for timely referral and intervention.

Method: We retrospectively calculated VA risk score using Vasc-Alert surveillance software technology from HD treatment sessions in 2 satellite HD units over 18 months. We included in the analysis HD patients dialysing with arteriovenous fistula or graft (AVF/G) with available Vasc-Alert data for≥ 2 months. For group one (eventful) that included patients who developed vascular access thrombosis or stenosis over the study period, we collected Vasc-Alert risk score 2 months prior to the event and, for group two (uneventful), over 5 consecutive months. Vasc-Alert technology utilises routinely collected data during HD to calculate VA risk score and triggers an alert if the score is ≥7 in 3 consecutive dialysis sessions. Patients with >2 alerts (vascular access score ≥7) per month were considered to have positive alerts.

Results: From 140 HD patients, 81 patients dialysed via AVF/G. 77/81 had available Vasc-Alert data and were included in the final analysis. Out of 17 eventful patients, 11 (64.7%) had positive alerts 2 months prior to the vascular event. Out of the 60 patients without vascular events, 20 patients (33.3%) had positive alert. Vasc-Alert's sensitivity and specificity for vascular events were 64.7% and 66.6%, respectively. Within the 6 patients with thrombosed access, 2 patients (33.3%) detected by Vasc-Alert were not detected with clinical monitoring.

Conclusion: Vascular access risk score can be a useful non-invasive vascular access surveillance method to assist clinical decision making.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nephron
Nephron UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: ''Nephron'' comprises three sections, which are each under the editorship of internationally recognized leaders and served by specialized Associate Editors. Apart from high-quality original research, ''Nephron'' publishes invited reviews/minireviews on up-to-date topics. Papers undergo an innovative and transparent peer review process encompassing a Presentation Report which assesses and summarizes the presentation of the paper in an unbiased and standardized way.
期刊最新文献
Sex Differences in Kidney Health and Disease. Myths, Realities and Pathways Forward -- A Patient's Thoughts on Person-Centred Care. Demand Analysis of Self-Management Mobile Health Applications for Middle-Aged and older Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease Based on the Kano Model. An Outbreak of Shiga Toxin-Positive Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli 0104:H4 Related Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome in Turkey: A Multicenter Study. NF-κB/miR-455-5p/SOCS3 axis aggravates sepsis induced acute kidney injury through promoting renal inflammation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1