COVID-19大流行期间癌症幸存者的久坐时间转换及其与生活质量的关系。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Journal of Psychosocial Oncology Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.1080/07347332.2024.2346560
Alyssa R Neville, Allyson Tabaczynski, Alexis Whitehorn, Denise Bastas, Linda Trinh
{"title":"COVID-19大流行期间癌症幸存者的久坐时间转换及其与生活质量的关系。","authors":"Alyssa R Neville, Allyson Tabaczynski, Alexis Whitehorn, Denise Bastas, Linda Trinh","doi":"10.1080/07347332.2024.2346560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patterns in sedentary time (SED) and its impact on quality of life (QoL) in cancer survivors during the COVID-19 pandemic remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to 1) compare total and domain-specific SED before and during the pandemic; and 2) examine its association with QoL in a global sample of cancer survivors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In an online survey, cancer survivors retrospectively self-reported domain-specific SED (e.g. transportation, television) before and during the pandemic via the Domain-Specific Sitting Time Questionnaire. QoL was assessed via the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT)-General and FACT-Fatigue. Paired <i>t</i>-tests compared daily SED before and during the pandemic. Analysis of covariance compared QoL among: those who remained high (>8 h/day), remained low (<8 h/day), increased (<8 h/day to >8 h/day), or decreased (>8 h/day to <8 h/day) daily SED.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among cancer survivors (<i>N</i> = 477, M<sub>age</sub>=48.5 ± 15.4), 60.8% reported that their SED remained high, 19.7% remained low, 7.5% increased SED, and 11.9% decreased SED. Computer and television screen time significantly increased (<i>p's</i><.001), while SED during transportation significantly decreased (<i>p</i><.001). Sub-group analyses revealed that those who reduced SED who were normal or underweight (<i>p</i>=.042) or were meeting physical activity guidelines (<i>p</i>=.031) had significantly less fatigue than those who increased or remained high in SED, respectively. Those who remained high in SED with <3 comorbidities (<i>p's</i> =.005) had significantly better social well-being than those who increased SED.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As we transition to a post-pandemic era, behavioral strategies for cancer survivors should focus on reducing screen time to improve QoL and fatigue.</p>","PeriodicalId":47451,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychosocial Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sedentary time transitions and associations with quality of life in cancer survivors during the COVID-19 pandemic.\",\"authors\":\"Alyssa R Neville, Allyson Tabaczynski, Alexis Whitehorn, Denise Bastas, Linda Trinh\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07347332.2024.2346560\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patterns in sedentary time (SED) and its impact on quality of life (QoL) in cancer survivors during the COVID-19 pandemic remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to 1) compare total and domain-specific SED before and during the pandemic; and 2) examine its association with QoL in a global sample of cancer survivors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In an online survey, cancer survivors retrospectively self-reported domain-specific SED (e.g. transportation, television) before and during the pandemic via the Domain-Specific Sitting Time Questionnaire. QoL was assessed via the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT)-General and FACT-Fatigue. Paired <i>t</i>-tests compared daily SED before and during the pandemic. Analysis of covariance compared QoL among: those who remained high (>8 h/day), remained low (<8 h/day), increased (<8 h/day to >8 h/day), or decreased (>8 h/day to <8 h/day) daily SED.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among cancer survivors (<i>N</i> = 477, M<sub>age</sub>=48.5 ± 15.4), 60.8% reported that their SED remained high, 19.7% remained low, 7.5% increased SED, and 11.9% decreased SED. Computer and television screen time significantly increased (<i>p's</i><.001), while SED during transportation significantly decreased (<i>p</i><.001). Sub-group analyses revealed that those who reduced SED who were normal or underweight (<i>p</i>=.042) or were meeting physical activity guidelines (<i>p</i>=.031) had significantly less fatigue than those who increased or remained high in SED, respectively. Those who remained high in SED with <3 comorbidities (<i>p's</i> =.005) had significantly better social well-being than those who increased SED.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As we transition to a post-pandemic era, behavioral strategies for cancer survivors should focus on reducing screen time to improve QoL and fatigue.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47451,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Psychosocial Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-18\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Psychosocial Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07347332.2024.2346560\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychosocial Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07347332.2024.2346560","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在 COVID-19 大流行期间,癌症幸存者的久坐时间(SED)模式及其对生活质量(QoL)的影响仍然未知。本研究的目的是:1)比较大流行之前和期间的总久坐时间和特定领域的久坐时间;2)研究全球癌症幸存者样本中久坐时间与生活质量的关系:在一项在线调查中,癌症幸存者通过 "特定领域久坐时间问卷 "回顾性地自我报告了大流行之前和期间特定领域的SED(如交通、电视)。QoL 通过癌症治疗功能评估 (FACT) - 一般和 FACT - 疲劳进行评估。通过配对 t 检验比较了大流行前和大流行期间的每日 SED。协方差分析比较了以下人群的 QoL:保持高水平(>8 小时/天)、保持低水平(8 小时/天)或降低水平(>8 小时/天)的人群:在癌症幸存者(N = 477,Mage=48.5 ± 15.4)中,60.8% 的人表示他们的 SED 保持在高水平,19.7% 的人保持在低水平,7.5% 的人增加了 SED,11.9% 的人减少了 SED。电脑和电视屏幕时间明显增加(p'spp=.042)或达到体育活动指南要求(p=.031)的人的疲劳感分别明显少于SED增加或保持高水平的人。那些 SED 保持在高水平(p=.005)的人的社会福利明显好于那些 SED 增加的人:结论:随着我们过渡到后流行病时代,针对癌症幸存者的行为策略应侧重于减少屏幕时间,以改善质量生活和疲劳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sedentary time transitions and associations with quality of life in cancer survivors during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Background: Patterns in sedentary time (SED) and its impact on quality of life (QoL) in cancer survivors during the COVID-19 pandemic remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to 1) compare total and domain-specific SED before and during the pandemic; and 2) examine its association with QoL in a global sample of cancer survivors.

Methods: In an online survey, cancer survivors retrospectively self-reported domain-specific SED (e.g. transportation, television) before and during the pandemic via the Domain-Specific Sitting Time Questionnaire. QoL was assessed via the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT)-General and FACT-Fatigue. Paired t-tests compared daily SED before and during the pandemic. Analysis of covariance compared QoL among: those who remained high (>8 h/day), remained low (<8 h/day), increased (<8 h/day to >8 h/day), or decreased (>8 h/day to <8 h/day) daily SED.

Results: Among cancer survivors (N = 477, Mage=48.5 ± 15.4), 60.8% reported that their SED remained high, 19.7% remained low, 7.5% increased SED, and 11.9% decreased SED. Computer and television screen time significantly increased (p's<.001), while SED during transportation significantly decreased (p<.001). Sub-group analyses revealed that those who reduced SED who were normal or underweight (p=.042) or were meeting physical activity guidelines (p=.031) had significantly less fatigue than those who increased or remained high in SED, respectively. Those who remained high in SED with <3 comorbidities (p's =.005) had significantly better social well-being than those who increased SED.

Conclusions: As we transition to a post-pandemic era, behavioral strategies for cancer survivors should focus on reducing screen time to improve QoL and fatigue.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Psychosocial Oncology
Journal of Psychosocial Oncology PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Here is your single source of integrated information on providing the best psychosocial care possible from the knowledge available from many disciplines.The Journal of Psychosocial Oncology is an essential source for up-to-date clinical and research material geared toward health professionals who provide psychosocial services to cancer patients, their families, and their caregivers. The journal—the first interdisciplinary resource of its kind—is in its third decade of examining exploratory and hypothesis testing and presenting program evaluation research on critical areas, including: the stigma of cancer; employment and personal problems facing cancer patients; patient education.
期刊最新文献
Correction. Understanding the patient-spouse communication experience during chemotherapy for gastric cancer: A qualitative study. Quality of life and unmet needs of late-stage and metastatic colorectal cancer survivors: An integrative review. The meaning-making process in the re-entry phase: A qualitative focus group study with patients treated for breast cancer or melanoma. Adaptation and feasibility of the Swedish Promoting Resilience in Stress Management intervention targeting adolescents and young adults newly diagnosed with cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1