私立和公立医疗机构患者血液透析的经济负担及相关因素:埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴的一项横断面研究。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation Pub Date : 2024-04-04 DOI:10.1186/s12962-024-00530-7
Tiruneh Amsalu Baye, Hamelmal Gebeyehu, Mahteme Bekele, Semira Abdelmenan, Tigistu Adamu Ashengo, Berhanu Mengistu
{"title":"私立和公立医疗机构患者血液透析的经济负担及相关因素:埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴的一项横断面研究。","authors":"Tiruneh Amsalu Baye, Hamelmal Gebeyehu, Mahteme Bekele, Semira Abdelmenan, Tigistu Adamu Ashengo, Berhanu Mengistu","doi":"10.1186/s12962-024-00530-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The treatment of kidney disease, including hemodialysis, poses challenges in healthcare and finances. Despite limited data on hemodialysis costs and determinants in Ethiopia, existing literature indicates a paucity of evidence regarding the economic burden of hemodialysis. This study aims to evaluate the direct and indirect costs of hemodialysis among end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients, alongside associated factors, among selected governmental and private institutions in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An institutional-based cross-sectional study using a simple random sampling technique was conducted from September 10 to November 1, 2021. One hundred twenty-eight patients participated in the study. Data was collected using an interviewer-administered questionnaire. The analysis used proportion and frequency measures of central tendency and linear regression measures. Both simple and multiple linear regression models were used to assess associated factors. The final model used a P value < 0.05 at 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to determine significance.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The mean cost of hemodialysis in a representative sample of selected hospitals in Addis Ababa was 7,739.17 $ ±2,833.51 $, with direct medical cost contributing 72.9% of the total cost. Furthermore, the institution type (private or public) and duration on hemodialysis were associated with an increased cost of hemodialysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings underline the necessity for policymakers, program administrators, and healthcare institution executives to prioritize this group, recognizing the substantial load they bear and extending these services in government facilities to a broader patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":47054,"journal":{"name":"Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation","volume":"22 1","pages":"25"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10996090/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The economic burden of hemodialysis and associated factors of among patients in private and public health facilities: a cross-sectional study in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.\",\"authors\":\"Tiruneh Amsalu Baye, Hamelmal Gebeyehu, Mahteme Bekele, Semira Abdelmenan, Tigistu Adamu Ashengo, Berhanu Mengistu\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12962-024-00530-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The treatment of kidney disease, including hemodialysis, poses challenges in healthcare and finances. Despite limited data on hemodialysis costs and determinants in Ethiopia, existing literature indicates a paucity of evidence regarding the economic burden of hemodialysis. This study aims to evaluate the direct and indirect costs of hemodialysis among end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients, alongside associated factors, among selected governmental and private institutions in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An institutional-based cross-sectional study using a simple random sampling technique was conducted from September 10 to November 1, 2021. One hundred twenty-eight patients participated in the study. Data was collected using an interviewer-administered questionnaire. The analysis used proportion and frequency measures of central tendency and linear regression measures. Both simple and multiple linear regression models were used to assess associated factors. The final model used a P value < 0.05 at 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to determine significance.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The mean cost of hemodialysis in a representative sample of selected hospitals in Addis Ababa was 7,739.17 $ ±2,833.51 $, with direct medical cost contributing 72.9% of the total cost. Furthermore, the institution type (private or public) and duration on hemodialysis were associated with an increased cost of hemodialysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings underline the necessity for policymakers, program administrators, and healthcare institution executives to prioritize this group, recognizing the substantial load they bear and extending these services in government facilities to a broader patient population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47054,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"25\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10996090/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12962-024-00530-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12962-024-00530-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍:包括血液透析在内的肾病治疗给医疗保健和财政带来了挑战。尽管有关埃塞俄比亚血液透析成本和决定因素的数据有限,但现有文献表明有关血液透析经济负担的证据很少。本研究旨在评估埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴选定的政府和私营机构中终末期肾病(ESRD)患者血液透析的直接和间接成本以及相关因素:2021 年 9 月 10 日至 11 月 1 日,采用简单随机抽样技术进行了一项以机构为基础的横断面研究。128 名患者参与了研究。数据收集采用访谈者发放的调查问卷。分析采用了中心倾向的比例和频率测量法以及线性回归测量法。简单和多元线性回归模型用于评估相关因素。最终模型采用了 P 值结果:在亚的斯亚贝巴具有代表性的选定医院样本中,血液透析的平均成本为 7,739.17 美元(±2,833.51 美元),其中直接医疗成本占总成本的 72.9%。此外,机构类型(私立或公立)和血液透析持续时间也与血液透析费用的增加有关:我们的研究结果表明,政策制定者、项目管理人员和医疗机构管理人员有必要优先考虑这一群体,认识到他们所承担的巨大负担,并将政府机构的这些服务扩展到更广泛的患者群体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The economic burden of hemodialysis and associated factors of among patients in private and public health facilities: a cross-sectional study in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Introduction: The treatment of kidney disease, including hemodialysis, poses challenges in healthcare and finances. Despite limited data on hemodialysis costs and determinants in Ethiopia, existing literature indicates a paucity of evidence regarding the economic burden of hemodialysis. This study aims to evaluate the direct and indirect costs of hemodialysis among end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients, alongside associated factors, among selected governmental and private institutions in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Methods: An institutional-based cross-sectional study using a simple random sampling technique was conducted from September 10 to November 1, 2021. One hundred twenty-eight patients participated in the study. Data was collected using an interviewer-administered questionnaire. The analysis used proportion and frequency measures of central tendency and linear regression measures. Both simple and multiple linear regression models were used to assess associated factors. The final model used a P value < 0.05 at 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to determine significance.

Result: The mean cost of hemodialysis in a representative sample of selected hospitals in Addis Ababa was 7,739.17 $ ±2,833.51 $, with direct medical cost contributing 72.9% of the total cost. Furthermore, the institution type (private or public) and duration on hemodialysis were associated with an increased cost of hemodialysis.

Conclusion: Our findings underline the necessity for policymakers, program administrators, and healthcare institution executives to prioritize this group, recognizing the substantial load they bear and extending these services in government facilities to a broader patient population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
59
审稿时长
34 weeks
期刊介绍: Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal that considers manuscripts on all aspects of cost-effectiveness analysis, including conceptual or methodological work, economic evaluations, and policy analysis related to resource allocation at a national or international level. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation is aimed at health economists, health services researchers, and policy-makers with an interest in enhancing the flow and transfer of knowledge relating to efficiency in the health sector. Manuscripts are encouraged from researchers based in low- and middle-income countries, with a view to increasing the international economic evidence base for health.
期刊最新文献
Assessing diagnosis-related groups based direct medical expenditures of chronic disease patients in general hospital of lower southern Thailand. Health system efficiency and equity in ASEAN: an empirical investigation. Coverage and distributional benefit-cost of rotavirus vaccine in Uganda: an analysis of routine health facility aggregated data. Cost-effectiveness of fenofibrate for preventing diabetic complications in Australia. Cost-effectiveness of high-dose vitamin D supplementation to reduce the occurrence of repeat episodes of pneumonia in children.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1