{"title":"私立和公立医疗机构患者血液透析的经济负担及相关因素:埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴的一项横断面研究。","authors":"Tiruneh Amsalu Baye, Hamelmal Gebeyehu, Mahteme Bekele, Semira Abdelmenan, Tigistu Adamu Ashengo, Berhanu Mengistu","doi":"10.1186/s12962-024-00530-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The treatment of kidney disease, including hemodialysis, poses challenges in healthcare and finances. Despite limited data on hemodialysis costs and determinants in Ethiopia, existing literature indicates a paucity of evidence regarding the economic burden of hemodialysis. This study aims to evaluate the direct and indirect costs of hemodialysis among end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients, alongside associated factors, among selected governmental and private institutions in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An institutional-based cross-sectional study using a simple random sampling technique was conducted from September 10 to November 1, 2021. One hundred twenty-eight patients participated in the study. Data was collected using an interviewer-administered questionnaire. The analysis used proportion and frequency measures of central tendency and linear regression measures. Both simple and multiple linear regression models were used to assess associated factors. The final model used a P value < 0.05 at 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to determine significance.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The mean cost of hemodialysis in a representative sample of selected hospitals in Addis Ababa was 7,739.17 $ ±2,833.51 $, with direct medical cost contributing 72.9% of the total cost. Furthermore, the institution type (private or public) and duration on hemodialysis were associated with an increased cost of hemodialysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings underline the necessity for policymakers, program administrators, and healthcare institution executives to prioritize this group, recognizing the substantial load they bear and extending these services in government facilities to a broader patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":47054,"journal":{"name":"Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation","volume":"22 1","pages":"25"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10996090/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The economic burden of hemodialysis and associated factors of among patients in private and public health facilities: a cross-sectional study in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.\",\"authors\":\"Tiruneh Amsalu Baye, Hamelmal Gebeyehu, Mahteme Bekele, Semira Abdelmenan, Tigistu Adamu Ashengo, Berhanu Mengistu\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12962-024-00530-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The treatment of kidney disease, including hemodialysis, poses challenges in healthcare and finances. Despite limited data on hemodialysis costs and determinants in Ethiopia, existing literature indicates a paucity of evidence regarding the economic burden of hemodialysis. This study aims to evaluate the direct and indirect costs of hemodialysis among end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients, alongside associated factors, among selected governmental and private institutions in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An institutional-based cross-sectional study using a simple random sampling technique was conducted from September 10 to November 1, 2021. One hundred twenty-eight patients participated in the study. Data was collected using an interviewer-administered questionnaire. The analysis used proportion and frequency measures of central tendency and linear regression measures. Both simple and multiple linear regression models were used to assess associated factors. The final model used a P value < 0.05 at 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to determine significance.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The mean cost of hemodialysis in a representative sample of selected hospitals in Addis Ababa was 7,739.17 $ ±2,833.51 $, with direct medical cost contributing 72.9% of the total cost. Furthermore, the institution type (private or public) and duration on hemodialysis were associated with an increased cost of hemodialysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings underline the necessity for policymakers, program administrators, and healthcare institution executives to prioritize this group, recognizing the substantial load they bear and extending these services in government facilities to a broader patient population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47054,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"25\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10996090/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12962-024-00530-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12962-024-00530-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
The economic burden of hemodialysis and associated factors of among patients in private and public health facilities: a cross-sectional study in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Introduction: The treatment of kidney disease, including hemodialysis, poses challenges in healthcare and finances. Despite limited data on hemodialysis costs and determinants in Ethiopia, existing literature indicates a paucity of evidence regarding the economic burden of hemodialysis. This study aims to evaluate the direct and indirect costs of hemodialysis among end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients, alongside associated factors, among selected governmental and private institutions in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Methods: An institutional-based cross-sectional study using a simple random sampling technique was conducted from September 10 to November 1, 2021. One hundred twenty-eight patients participated in the study. Data was collected using an interviewer-administered questionnaire. The analysis used proportion and frequency measures of central tendency and linear regression measures. Both simple and multiple linear regression models were used to assess associated factors. The final model used a P value < 0.05 at 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to determine significance.
Result: The mean cost of hemodialysis in a representative sample of selected hospitals in Addis Ababa was 7,739.17 $ ±2,833.51 $, with direct medical cost contributing 72.9% of the total cost. Furthermore, the institution type (private or public) and duration on hemodialysis were associated with an increased cost of hemodialysis.
Conclusion: Our findings underline the necessity for policymakers, program administrators, and healthcare institution executives to prioritize this group, recognizing the substantial load they bear and extending these services in government facilities to a broader patient population.
期刊介绍:
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal that considers manuscripts on all aspects of cost-effectiveness analysis, including conceptual or methodological work, economic evaluations, and policy analysis related to resource allocation at a national or international level. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation is aimed at health economists, health services researchers, and policy-makers with an interest in enhancing the flow and transfer of knowledge relating to efficiency in the health sector. Manuscripts are encouraged from researchers based in low- and middle-income countries, with a view to increasing the international economic evidence base for health.