{"title":"外周肺部病变的对比增强成像:在 US 引导活检中的作用。","authors":"Xue-Yan Wang, Zhi-Fan Yuan, Ke-Hong Gan, Yuan Zhong, Jia-Xin Huang, Wei-Jun Huang, Yu-Huan Xie, Xiao-Qing Pei","doi":"10.1148/ryct.230234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Purpose To compare the tissue adequacy and diagnostic accuracy of US-guided biopsies of peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs) with and without contrast agents. Materials and Methods A retrospective study was conducted at four medical centers in patients with PPLs who underwent US-guided percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy (PTNB) between January 2017 and October 2022. The patients were divided into contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) and US groups based on whether prebiopsy CEUS evaluation was performed. Tissue adequacy and the diagnostic accuracy of PTNB, stratified by lesion size, were analyzed and compared between groups. A propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was conducted using the nearest-neighbor matching method. Results A total of 1027 lesions were analyzed, with 634 patients (mean age, 59.4 years ± 13.0 [SD]; 413 male) in the US group and 393 patients (mean age, 61.2 years ± 12.5; 270 male) in the CEUS group. The CEUS group produced more acceptable samples than the US group (98.2% vs 95.7%; <i>P</i> = .03) and achieved higher diagnostic accuracy (96.9% vs 94.2%; <i>P</i> = .04), with no evidence of a difference in sensitivity (96.7% vs 94.0%; <i>P</i> = .06). PSM and stratified analyses (<i>n</i> = 358 per group) indicated higher tissue adequacy (99.0% vs 95.7%; <i>P</i> = .04) and diagnostic accuracy (98.5% vs 92.9%; <i>P</i> = .006) in the CEUS group compared with the US group for 2-7-cm PPLs but not for lesions larger than 7 cm. Conclusion PTNB with prebiopsy CEUS evaluation demonstrated significantly better tissue adequacy and diagnostic accuracy compared with US guidance alone for PPLs ranging from 2 to 7 cm, with similar biopsy performance achieved between groups for lesions larger than 7 cm. <b>Keywords:</b> Contrast Material, Thoracic Diseases, Ultrasonography, Image-Guided Biopsy © RSNA, 2024.</p>","PeriodicalId":21168,"journal":{"name":"Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11211938/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contrast-enhanced Imaging in Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions: The Role in US-guided Biopsies.\",\"authors\":\"Xue-Yan Wang, Zhi-Fan Yuan, Ke-Hong Gan, Yuan Zhong, Jia-Xin Huang, Wei-Jun Huang, Yu-Huan Xie, Xiao-Qing Pei\",\"doi\":\"10.1148/ryct.230234\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Purpose To compare the tissue adequacy and diagnostic accuracy of US-guided biopsies of peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs) with and without contrast agents. Materials and Methods A retrospective study was conducted at four medical centers in patients with PPLs who underwent US-guided percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy (PTNB) between January 2017 and October 2022. The patients were divided into contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) and US groups based on whether prebiopsy CEUS evaluation was performed. Tissue adequacy and the diagnostic accuracy of PTNB, stratified by lesion size, were analyzed and compared between groups. A propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was conducted using the nearest-neighbor matching method. Results A total of 1027 lesions were analyzed, with 634 patients (mean age, 59.4 years ± 13.0 [SD]; 413 male) in the US group and 393 patients (mean age, 61.2 years ± 12.5; 270 male) in the CEUS group. The CEUS group produced more acceptable samples than the US group (98.2% vs 95.7%; <i>P</i> = .03) and achieved higher diagnostic accuracy (96.9% vs 94.2%; <i>P</i> = .04), with no evidence of a difference in sensitivity (96.7% vs 94.0%; <i>P</i> = .06). PSM and stratified analyses (<i>n</i> = 358 per group) indicated higher tissue adequacy (99.0% vs 95.7%; <i>P</i> = .04) and diagnostic accuracy (98.5% vs 92.9%; <i>P</i> = .006) in the CEUS group compared with the US group for 2-7-cm PPLs but not for lesions larger than 7 cm. Conclusion PTNB with prebiopsy CEUS evaluation demonstrated significantly better tissue adequacy and diagnostic accuracy compared with US guidance alone for PPLs ranging from 2 to 7 cm, with similar biopsy performance achieved between groups for lesions larger than 7 cm. <b>Keywords:</b> Contrast Material, Thoracic Diseases, Ultrasonography, Image-Guided Biopsy © RSNA, 2024.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11211938/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1148/ryct.230234\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1148/ryct.230234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0