采用混合方法对中低收入国家使用数字医疗干预措施为患者提供姑息治疗和临终关怀服务的情况进行系统性研究。

IF 2.7 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Palliative Care and Social Practice Pub Date : 2024-04-12 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26323524241236965
Weerasingha Navarathnage Sachintha Dilhani, Sarah Mitchell, Jeremy Dale, Kavanbir Toor, Mikail Javaid, John I MacArtney
{"title":"采用混合方法对中低收入国家使用数字医疗干预措施为患者提供姑息治疗和临终关怀服务的情况进行系统性研究。","authors":"Weerasingha Navarathnage Sachintha Dilhani, Sarah Mitchell, Jeremy Dale, Kavanbir Toor, Mikail Javaid, John I MacArtney","doi":"10.1177/26323524241236965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The need for palliative care is rising globally with 76% of those who are in need living in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Digital health interventions (DHIs) have been identified as a means of making palliative care more widely accessible. This review summarizes the range and characteristics of DHIs used to deliver palliative care in LMICs and sought to identify factors that influence their implementation and utilization.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This review aims to summarize the range and characteristics of DHIs used to deliver palliative care in LMICs and identify factors that influence their implementation and utilization.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Mixed-method systematic review incorporating both quantitative and qualitative data.</p><p><strong>Data sources and methods: </strong>All studies focusing on DHIs for patients who need palliative care (adults/children) and their caregivers (patient and caregiver centred) in LMICs and published in English were identified through a systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and CINAHL databases. Data synthesis and analysis were carried out following the convergent integrated approach based on the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for mixed-methods systematic reviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen studies were included (three qualitative, four mixed-methods and eight quantitative studies). Telemedicine/mHealth was the most reported DHI utilized in LMICs in delivering palliative care. Patients and caregivers benefited from using DHIs in many ways including increased access to care with reduced discomfort, travel time and risk of health care-associated infections. Health care providers also reported that using DHI such as telemedicine enables them to provide care in a more effective and efficient way. Four factors were identified as the main barriers to implementation: resource constraints; literacy, training and skills; governance, operational and communication issues and technical issues.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DHIs, such as telemedicine, have the potential to enhance accessibility to palliative care in LMICs, particularly in rural areas. Comprehensive strategies for their use are required to address the identified barriers.</p>","PeriodicalId":36693,"journal":{"name":"Palliative Care and Social Practice","volume":"18 ","pages":"26323524241236965"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11010586/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A mixed-methods systematic review investigating the use of digital health interventions to provide palliative and end-of-life care for patients in low- and middle-income countries.\",\"authors\":\"Weerasingha Navarathnage Sachintha Dilhani, Sarah Mitchell, Jeremy Dale, Kavanbir Toor, Mikail Javaid, John I MacArtney\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/26323524241236965\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The need for palliative care is rising globally with 76% of those who are in need living in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Digital health interventions (DHIs) have been identified as a means of making palliative care more widely accessible. This review summarizes the range and characteristics of DHIs used to deliver palliative care in LMICs and sought to identify factors that influence their implementation and utilization.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This review aims to summarize the range and characteristics of DHIs used to deliver palliative care in LMICs and identify factors that influence their implementation and utilization.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Mixed-method systematic review incorporating both quantitative and qualitative data.</p><p><strong>Data sources and methods: </strong>All studies focusing on DHIs for patients who need palliative care (adults/children) and their caregivers (patient and caregiver centred) in LMICs and published in English were identified through a systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and CINAHL databases. Data synthesis and analysis were carried out following the convergent integrated approach based on the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for mixed-methods systematic reviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen studies were included (three qualitative, four mixed-methods and eight quantitative studies). Telemedicine/mHealth was the most reported DHI utilized in LMICs in delivering palliative care. Patients and caregivers benefited from using DHIs in many ways including increased access to care with reduced discomfort, travel time and risk of health care-associated infections. Health care providers also reported that using DHI such as telemedicine enables them to provide care in a more effective and efficient way. Four factors were identified as the main barriers to implementation: resource constraints; literacy, training and skills; governance, operational and communication issues and technical issues.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DHIs, such as telemedicine, have the potential to enhance accessibility to palliative care in LMICs, particularly in rural areas. Comprehensive strategies for their use are required to address the identified barriers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36693,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Palliative Care and Social Practice\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"26323524241236965\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11010586/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Palliative Care and Social Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/26323524241236965\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative Care and Social Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26323524241236965","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:全球对姑息关怀的需求不断增加,其中 76% 的需求者生活在中低收入国家(LMICs)。数字医疗干预(DHIs)被认为是使姑息关怀更广泛普及的一种手段。本综述总结了用于在低收入和中等收入国家提供姑息关怀的数字医疗干预措施的范围和特点,并试图找出影响其实施和利用的因素:本综述旨在总结在低收入国家和地区用于提供姑息关怀的地区医疗机构的范围和特点,并确定影响其实施和利用的因素:设计:混合方法系统综述,包括定量和定性数据:通过对 MEDLINE、EMBASE、PsycINFO 和 CINAHL 数据库进行系统检索,确定了所有针对需要姑息关怀的患者(成人/儿童)及其照护者(以患者和照护者为中心)的研究,这些研究均以英文发表。根据乔安娜-布里格斯研究所(Joanna Briggs Institute,JBI)的混合方法系统综述方法,采用聚合综合法对数据进行了综合和分析:结果:共纳入 15 项研究(3 项定性研究、4 项混合方法研究和 8 项定量研究)。据报道,远程医疗/医疗保健是低收入国家在提供姑息关怀时使用最多的医疗保健手段。患者和护理人员从使用远程医疗设备的许多方面受益,包括增加了获得护理的机会,减少了不适感、旅行时间和医疗相关感染的风险。医疗服务提供者也报告说,使用远程医疗等远程医疗基础设施使他们能够以更有效、更高效的方式提供医疗服务。有四个因素被认为是实施的主要障碍:资源限制;扫盲、培训和技能;管理、操作和沟通问题以及技术问题:远程医疗等远程医疗基础设施有可能提高低收入和中等收入国家(尤其是农村地区)姑息关怀的可及性。需要制定全面的使用策略,以解决已发现的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A mixed-methods systematic review investigating the use of digital health interventions to provide palliative and end-of-life care for patients in low- and middle-income countries.

Background: The need for palliative care is rising globally with 76% of those who are in need living in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Digital health interventions (DHIs) have been identified as a means of making palliative care more widely accessible. This review summarizes the range and characteristics of DHIs used to deliver palliative care in LMICs and sought to identify factors that influence their implementation and utilization.

Objectives: This review aims to summarize the range and characteristics of DHIs used to deliver palliative care in LMICs and identify factors that influence their implementation and utilization.

Design: Mixed-method systematic review incorporating both quantitative and qualitative data.

Data sources and methods: All studies focusing on DHIs for patients who need palliative care (adults/children) and their caregivers (patient and caregiver centred) in LMICs and published in English were identified through a systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and CINAHL databases. Data synthesis and analysis were carried out following the convergent integrated approach based on the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for mixed-methods systematic reviews.

Results: Fifteen studies were included (three qualitative, four mixed-methods and eight quantitative studies). Telemedicine/mHealth was the most reported DHI utilized in LMICs in delivering palliative care. Patients and caregivers benefited from using DHIs in many ways including increased access to care with reduced discomfort, travel time and risk of health care-associated infections. Health care providers also reported that using DHI such as telemedicine enables them to provide care in a more effective and efficient way. Four factors were identified as the main barriers to implementation: resource constraints; literacy, training and skills; governance, operational and communication issues and technical issues.

Conclusion: DHIs, such as telemedicine, have the potential to enhance accessibility to palliative care in LMICs, particularly in rural areas. Comprehensive strategies for their use are required to address the identified barriers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Palliative Care and Social Practice
Palliative Care and Social Practice Nursing-Advanced and Specialized Nursing
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
Individual characteristics influencing the general population's level of knowledge of end-of-life practices: a cross-sectional study. Assessing and comparing compassionate communities benefits across cities in diverse cultural contexts: a step toward the identification of the most important ones. Important factors in municipality-based pediatric palliation from healthcare professionals' perspective: A qualitative study. Integration of social work into specialist palliative home service. The process of pain assessment in people with dementia living in nursing homes: a scoping review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1