[新辅助直肠评分在新辅助短程放疗和巩固化疗后局部晚期直肠癌预后和辅助化疗决策中的作用]。

Q Zeng, Y Tang, H T Zhou, N Li, W Y Liu, S L Chen, S Li, N N Lu, H Fang, S L Wang, Y P Liu, Y W Song, Y X Li, J Jin
{"title":"[新辅助直肠评分在新辅助短程放疗和巩固化疗后局部晚期直肠癌预后和辅助化疗决策中的作用]。","authors":"Q Zeng, Y Tang, H T Zhou, N Li, W Y Liu, S L Chen, S Li, N N Lu, H Fang, S L Wang, Y P Liu, Y W Song, Y X Li, J Jin","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20231024-00216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> To assess the prognostic impact of the neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score following neoadjuvant short-course radiotherapy and consolidation chemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), as well as its value in guiding decisions for adjuvant chemotherapy. <b>Methods:</b> Between August 2015 and August 2018, patients were eligible from the STELLAR phase III trial (NCT02533271) who received short-course radiotherapy plus consolidation chemotherapy and for whom the NAR score could be calculated. Based on the NAR score, patients were categorized into low (<8), intermediate (8-16), and high (>16) groups. The Kaplan-Meier method, log rank tests, and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to evaluate the impact of the NAR score on disease-free survival (DFS). <b>Results:</b> Out of the 232 patients, 24.1%, 48.7%, and 27.2% had low (56 cases), intermediate (113 cases), and high NAR scores (63 cases), respectively. The median follow-up period was 37 months, with 3-year DFS rates of 87.3%, 68.3%, and 53.4% (<i>P</i><0.001) for the low, intermediate, and high NAR score groups. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the NAR score (intermediate NAR score: <i>HR</i>, 3.10, 95% <i>CI</i>, 1.30-7.37, <i>P</i>=0.011; high NAR scores: <i>HR</i>=5.44, 95% <i>CI</i>, 2.26-13.09, <i>P</i><0.001), resection status (<i>HR</i>, 3.00, 95% <i>CI</i>, 1.64-5.52, <i>P</i><0.001), and adjuvant chemotherapy (<i>HR</i>, 3.25, 95% <i>CI</i>, 2.01-5.27, <i>P</i><0.001) were independent prognostic factors for DFS. In patients with R0 resection, the 3-year DFS rates were 97.8% and 78.0% for those with low and intermediate NAR scores who received adjuvant chemotherapy, significantly higher than the 43.2% and 50.6% for those who did not (<i>P</i><0.001, <i>P</i>=0.002). There was no significant difference in the 3-year DFS rate (54.2% vs 53.3%, <i>P</i>=0.214) among high NAR score patients, regardless of adjuvant chemotherapy. <b>Conclusions:</b> The NAR score is a robust prognostic indicator in LARC following neoadjuvant short-course radiotherapy and consolidation chemotherapy, with potential implications for subsequent decisions regarding adjuvant chemotherapy. These findings warrant further validation in studies with larger sample sizes.</p>","PeriodicalId":39868,"journal":{"name":"中华肿瘤杂志","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Role of neoadjuvant rectal score in prognosis and adjuvant chemotherapy decision-making in locally advanced rectal cancer following neoadjuvant short-course radiotherapy and consolidation chemotherapy].\",\"authors\":\"Q Zeng, Y Tang, H T Zhou, N Li, W Y Liu, S L Chen, S Li, N N Lu, H Fang, S L Wang, Y P Liu, Y W Song, Y X Li, J Jin\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20231024-00216\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> To assess the prognostic impact of the neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score following neoadjuvant short-course radiotherapy and consolidation chemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), as well as its value in guiding decisions for adjuvant chemotherapy. <b>Methods:</b> Between August 2015 and August 2018, patients were eligible from the STELLAR phase III trial (NCT02533271) who received short-course radiotherapy plus consolidation chemotherapy and for whom the NAR score could be calculated. Based on the NAR score, patients were categorized into low (<8), intermediate (8-16), and high (>16) groups. The Kaplan-Meier method, log rank tests, and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to evaluate the impact of the NAR score on disease-free survival (DFS). <b>Results:</b> Out of the 232 patients, 24.1%, 48.7%, and 27.2% had low (56 cases), intermediate (113 cases), and high NAR scores (63 cases), respectively. The median follow-up period was 37 months, with 3-year DFS rates of 87.3%, 68.3%, and 53.4% (<i>P</i><0.001) for the low, intermediate, and high NAR score groups. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the NAR score (intermediate NAR score: <i>HR</i>, 3.10, 95% <i>CI</i>, 1.30-7.37, <i>P</i>=0.011; high NAR scores: <i>HR</i>=5.44, 95% <i>CI</i>, 2.26-13.09, <i>P</i><0.001), resection status (<i>HR</i>, 3.00, 95% <i>CI</i>, 1.64-5.52, <i>P</i><0.001), and adjuvant chemotherapy (<i>HR</i>, 3.25, 95% <i>CI</i>, 2.01-5.27, <i>P</i><0.001) were independent prognostic factors for DFS. In patients with R0 resection, the 3-year DFS rates were 97.8% and 78.0% for those with low and intermediate NAR scores who received adjuvant chemotherapy, significantly higher than the 43.2% and 50.6% for those who did not (<i>P</i><0.001, <i>P</i>=0.002). There was no significant difference in the 3-year DFS rate (54.2% vs 53.3%, <i>P</i>=0.214) among high NAR score patients, regardless of adjuvant chemotherapy. <b>Conclusions:</b> The NAR score is a robust prognostic indicator in LARC following neoadjuvant short-course radiotherapy and consolidation chemotherapy, with potential implications for subsequent decisions regarding adjuvant chemotherapy. These findings warrant further validation in studies with larger sample sizes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39868,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华肿瘤杂志\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华肿瘤杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20231024-00216\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华肿瘤杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20231024-00216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的评估局部晚期直肠癌(LARC)新辅助短程放疗和巩固化疗后直肠(NAR)新辅助评分对预后的影响,以及其对辅助化疗决策的指导价值。方法:2015年8月至2018年8月期间,STELLAR III期试验(NCT02533271)中符合条件的患者均接受了短程放疗加巩固化疗,且NAR评分可以计算。根据 NAR 评分,患者被分为低(<8)、中(8-16)和高(>16)组。采用卡普兰-梅耶法、对数秩检验和多变量考克斯比例危险回归模型评估NAR评分对无病生存期(DFS)的影响。结果显示在232例患者中,NAR评分低(56例)、中等(113例)和高(63例)的患者分别占24.1%、48.7%和27.2%。中位随访时间为37个月,低、中、高NAR评分组的3年DFS率分别为87.3%、68.3%和53.4%(P<0.001)。HR=5.44,95% CI,2.26-13.09,P<0.001)、切除状态(HR,3.00,95% CI,1.64-5.52,P<0.001)和辅助化疗(HR,3.25,95% CI,2.01-5.27,P<0.001)是DFS的独立预后因素。在R0切除的患者中,接受辅助化疗的低度和中度NAR评分患者的3年DFS率分别为97.8%和78.0%,显著高于未接受辅助化疗患者的43.2%和50.6%(P<0.001,P=0.002)。无论是否接受辅助化疗,NAR评分高的患者的3年DFS率没有明显差异(54.2% vs 53.3%,P=0.214)。结论:NAR评分是新辅助短程放疗和巩固化疗后LARC的一个可靠预后指标,对后续辅助化疗决策具有潜在影响。这些发现值得在样本量更大的研究中进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Role of neoadjuvant rectal score in prognosis and adjuvant chemotherapy decision-making in locally advanced rectal cancer following neoadjuvant short-course radiotherapy and consolidation chemotherapy].

Objectives: To assess the prognostic impact of the neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score following neoadjuvant short-course radiotherapy and consolidation chemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), as well as its value in guiding decisions for adjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: Between August 2015 and August 2018, patients were eligible from the STELLAR phase III trial (NCT02533271) who received short-course radiotherapy plus consolidation chemotherapy and for whom the NAR score could be calculated. Based on the NAR score, patients were categorized into low (<8), intermediate (8-16), and high (>16) groups. The Kaplan-Meier method, log rank tests, and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to evaluate the impact of the NAR score on disease-free survival (DFS). Results: Out of the 232 patients, 24.1%, 48.7%, and 27.2% had low (56 cases), intermediate (113 cases), and high NAR scores (63 cases), respectively. The median follow-up period was 37 months, with 3-year DFS rates of 87.3%, 68.3%, and 53.4% (P<0.001) for the low, intermediate, and high NAR score groups. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the NAR score (intermediate NAR score: HR, 3.10, 95% CI, 1.30-7.37, P=0.011; high NAR scores: HR=5.44, 95% CI, 2.26-13.09, P<0.001), resection status (HR, 3.00, 95% CI, 1.64-5.52, P<0.001), and adjuvant chemotherapy (HR, 3.25, 95% CI, 2.01-5.27, P<0.001) were independent prognostic factors for DFS. In patients with R0 resection, the 3-year DFS rates were 97.8% and 78.0% for those with low and intermediate NAR scores who received adjuvant chemotherapy, significantly higher than the 43.2% and 50.6% for those who did not (P<0.001, P=0.002). There was no significant difference in the 3-year DFS rate (54.2% vs 53.3%, P=0.214) among high NAR score patients, regardless of adjuvant chemotherapy. Conclusions: The NAR score is a robust prognostic indicator in LARC following neoadjuvant short-course radiotherapy and consolidation chemotherapy, with potential implications for subsequent decisions regarding adjuvant chemotherapy. These findings warrant further validation in studies with larger sample sizes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
中华肿瘤杂志
中华肿瘤杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10433
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
[International comparison and assessment of the quality of drug clinical trial implementation in China based on scientific regulatory system]. [A case of primary giant gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the liver]. [Chinese multidisciplinary expert consensus on the rational use of surufatinib in clinical practice(2024 edition)]. [Clinical predictive value of PD-1/PD-L1-induced electrocardiogram changes for cardiotoxicity]. [CT measurement of blood perfusion in hepatocellular carcinoma: from basic principle, measurement methods to clinical application].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1