Almahamoudou Mahamar PhD , Merel J Smit MD , Koualy Sanogo MD , Youssouf Sinaba MD , Sidi M Niambele PharmD , Adama Sacko MS , Oumar M Dicko MD , Makonon Diallo MD , Seydina O Maguiraga MD , Yaya Sankaré MD , Sekouba Keita MS , Siaka Samake Pharm D , Adama Dembele MS , Kjerstin Lanke PhD , Rob ter Heine PhD , John Bradley PhD , Yahia Dicko MD , Sekou F Traore PhD , Prof Chris Drakeley PhD , Prof Alassane Dicko MD , Will Stone PhD
{"title":"蒿甲醚-本芴醇联合或不联合单剂量伯氨喹和磺胺多辛-乙胺嘧啶加阿莫地喹联合或不联合单剂量他非诺喹以减少恶性疟原虫传播:在马里 Ouelessebougou 进行的 2 期单盲随机临床试验。","authors":"Almahamoudou Mahamar PhD , Merel J Smit MD , Koualy Sanogo MD , Youssouf Sinaba MD , Sidi M Niambele PharmD , Adama Sacko MS , Oumar M Dicko MD , Makonon Diallo MD , Seydina O Maguiraga MD , Yaya Sankaré MD , Sekouba Keita MS , Siaka Samake Pharm D , Adama Dembele MS , Kjerstin Lanke PhD , Rob ter Heine PhD , John Bradley PhD , Yahia Dicko MD , Sekou F Traore PhD , Prof Chris Drakeley PhD , Prof Alassane Dicko MD , Will Stone PhD","doi":"10.1016/S2666-5247(24)00023-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Artemether–lumefantrine is widely used for uncomplicated <em>Plasmodium falciparum</em> malaria; sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine is used for seasonal malaria chemoprevention. We aimed to determine the efficacy of artemether–lumefantrine with and without primaquine and sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine with and without tafenoquine for reducing gametocyte carriage and transmission to mosquitoes.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this phase 2, single-blind, randomised clinical trial conducted in Ouelessebougou, Mali, asymptomatic individuals aged 10–50 years with <em>P falciparum</em> gametocytaemia were recruited from the community and randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) to receive either artemether–lumefantrine, artemether–lumefantrine with a single dose of 0·25 mg/kg primaquine, sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine, or sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine with a single dose of 1·66 mg/kg tafenoquine. All trial staff other than the pharmacist were masked to group allocation. Participants were not masked to group allocation. Randomisation was done with a computer-generated randomisation list and concealed with sealed, opaque envelopes. The primary outcome was the median within-person percent change in mosquito infection rate in infectious individuals from baseline to day 2 (artemether–lumefantrine groups) or day 7 (sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine groups) after treatment, assessed by direct membrane feeding assay. All participants who received any trial drug were included in the safety analysis. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, <span>NCT05081089</span><svg><path></path></svg>.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Between Oct 13 and Dec 16, 2021, 1290 individuals were screened and 80 were enrolled and randomly assigned to one of the four treatment groups (20 per group). The median age of participants was 13 (IQR 11–20); 37 (46%) of 80 participants were female and 43 (54%) were male. In individuals who were infectious before treatment, the median percentage reduction in mosquito infection rate 2 days after treatment was 100·0% (IQR 100·0–100·0; n=19; p=0·0011) with artemether–lumefantrine and 100·0% (100·0–100·0; n=19; p=0·0001) with artemether–lumefantrine with primaquine. Only two individuals who were infectious at baseline infected mosquitoes on day 2 after artemether–lumefantrine and none at day 5. By contrast, the median percentage reduction in mosquito infection rate 7 days after treatment was 63·6% (IQR 0·0–100·0; n=20; p=0·013) with sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine and 100% (100·0–100·0; n=19; p<0·0001) with sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine with tafenoquine. No grade 3–4 or serious adverse events occurred.</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>These data support the effectiveness of artemether–lumefantrine alone for preventing nearly all mosquito infections. By contrast, there was considerable post-treatment transmission after sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine; therefore, the addition of a transmission-blocking drug might be beneficial in maximising its community impact.</p></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><p>Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46633,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Microbe","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":20.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666524724000235/pdfft?md5=d2becfd9b44d3eac932d539a6c48153f&pid=1-s2.0-S2666524724000235-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artemether–lumefantrine with or without single-dose primaquine and sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine with or without single-dose tafenoquine to reduce Plasmodium falciparum transmission: a phase 2, single-blind, randomised clinical trial in Ouelessebougou, Mali\",\"authors\":\"Almahamoudou Mahamar PhD , Merel J Smit MD , Koualy Sanogo MD , Youssouf Sinaba MD , Sidi M Niambele PharmD , Adama Sacko MS , Oumar M Dicko MD , Makonon Diallo MD , Seydina O Maguiraga MD , Yaya Sankaré MD , Sekouba Keita MS , Siaka Samake Pharm D , Adama Dembele MS , Kjerstin Lanke PhD , Rob ter Heine PhD , John Bradley PhD , Yahia Dicko MD , Sekou F Traore PhD , Prof Chris Drakeley PhD , Prof Alassane Dicko MD , Will Stone PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S2666-5247(24)00023-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Artemether–lumefantrine is widely used for uncomplicated <em>Plasmodium falciparum</em> malaria; sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine is used for seasonal malaria chemoprevention. We aimed to determine the efficacy of artemether–lumefantrine with and without primaquine and sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine with and without tafenoquine for reducing gametocyte carriage and transmission to mosquitoes.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this phase 2, single-blind, randomised clinical trial conducted in Ouelessebougou, Mali, asymptomatic individuals aged 10–50 years with <em>P falciparum</em> gametocytaemia were recruited from the community and randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) to receive either artemether–lumefantrine, artemether–lumefantrine with a single dose of 0·25 mg/kg primaquine, sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine, or sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine with a single dose of 1·66 mg/kg tafenoquine. All trial staff other than the pharmacist were masked to group allocation. Participants were not masked to group allocation. Randomisation was done with a computer-generated randomisation list and concealed with sealed, opaque envelopes. The primary outcome was the median within-person percent change in mosquito infection rate in infectious individuals from baseline to day 2 (artemether–lumefantrine groups) or day 7 (sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine groups) after treatment, assessed by direct membrane feeding assay. All participants who received any trial drug were included in the safety analysis. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, <span>NCT05081089</span><svg><path></path></svg>.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Between Oct 13 and Dec 16, 2021, 1290 individuals were screened and 80 were enrolled and randomly assigned to one of the four treatment groups (20 per group). The median age of participants was 13 (IQR 11–20); 37 (46%) of 80 participants were female and 43 (54%) were male. In individuals who were infectious before treatment, the median percentage reduction in mosquito infection rate 2 days after treatment was 100·0% (IQR 100·0–100·0; n=19; p=0·0011) with artemether–lumefantrine and 100·0% (100·0–100·0; n=19; p=0·0001) with artemether–lumefantrine with primaquine. Only two individuals who were infectious at baseline infected mosquitoes on day 2 after artemether–lumefantrine and none at day 5. By contrast, the median percentage reduction in mosquito infection rate 7 days after treatment was 63·6% (IQR 0·0–100·0; n=20; p=0·013) with sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine and 100% (100·0–100·0; n=19; p<0·0001) with sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine with tafenoquine. No grade 3–4 or serious adverse events occurred.</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>These data support the effectiveness of artemether–lumefantrine alone for preventing nearly all mosquito infections. By contrast, there was considerable post-treatment transmission after sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine; therefore, the addition of a transmission-blocking drug might be beneficial in maximising its community impact.</p></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><p>Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46633,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lancet Microbe\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":20.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666524724000235/pdfft?md5=d2becfd9b44d3eac932d539a6c48153f&pid=1-s2.0-S2666524724000235-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lancet Microbe\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666524724000235\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Microbe","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666524724000235","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Artemether–lumefantrine with or without single-dose primaquine and sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine with or without single-dose tafenoquine to reduce Plasmodium falciparum transmission: a phase 2, single-blind, randomised clinical trial in Ouelessebougou, Mali
Background
Artemether–lumefantrine is widely used for uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria; sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine is used for seasonal malaria chemoprevention. We aimed to determine the efficacy of artemether–lumefantrine with and without primaquine and sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine with and without tafenoquine for reducing gametocyte carriage and transmission to mosquitoes.
Methods
In this phase 2, single-blind, randomised clinical trial conducted in Ouelessebougou, Mali, asymptomatic individuals aged 10–50 years with P falciparum gametocytaemia were recruited from the community and randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) to receive either artemether–lumefantrine, artemether–lumefantrine with a single dose of 0·25 mg/kg primaquine, sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine, or sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine with a single dose of 1·66 mg/kg tafenoquine. All trial staff other than the pharmacist were masked to group allocation. Participants were not masked to group allocation. Randomisation was done with a computer-generated randomisation list and concealed with sealed, opaque envelopes. The primary outcome was the median within-person percent change in mosquito infection rate in infectious individuals from baseline to day 2 (artemether–lumefantrine groups) or day 7 (sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine groups) after treatment, assessed by direct membrane feeding assay. All participants who received any trial drug were included in the safety analysis. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05081089.
Findings
Between Oct 13 and Dec 16, 2021, 1290 individuals were screened and 80 were enrolled and randomly assigned to one of the four treatment groups (20 per group). The median age of participants was 13 (IQR 11–20); 37 (46%) of 80 participants were female and 43 (54%) were male. In individuals who were infectious before treatment, the median percentage reduction in mosquito infection rate 2 days after treatment was 100·0% (IQR 100·0–100·0; n=19; p=0·0011) with artemether–lumefantrine and 100·0% (100·0–100·0; n=19; p=0·0001) with artemether–lumefantrine with primaquine. Only two individuals who were infectious at baseline infected mosquitoes on day 2 after artemether–lumefantrine and none at day 5. By contrast, the median percentage reduction in mosquito infection rate 7 days after treatment was 63·6% (IQR 0·0–100·0; n=20; p=0·013) with sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine and 100% (100·0–100·0; n=19; p<0·0001) with sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine with tafenoquine. No grade 3–4 or serious adverse events occurred.
Interpretation
These data support the effectiveness of artemether–lumefantrine alone for preventing nearly all mosquito infections. By contrast, there was considerable post-treatment transmission after sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine; therefore, the addition of a transmission-blocking drug might be beneficial in maximising its community impact.
期刊介绍:
The Lancet Microbe is a gold open access journal committed to publishing content relevant to clinical microbiologists worldwide, with a focus on studies that advance clinical understanding, challenge the status quo, and advocate change in health policy.