Additive Value of Magnetic Resonance Simulation Before Chemoradiation in Evaluating Treatment Response and Pseudoprogression in High-Grade Gliomas

Purpose

A dedicated magnetic resonance imaging simulation (MRsim) for radiation treatment (RT) planning in patients with high-grade glioma (HGG) can detect early radiologic changes, including tumor progression after surgery and before standard of care chemoradiation. This study aimed to determine the effect of using postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) versus MRsim as the baseline for response assessment and reporting pseudoprogression on follow-up imaging at 1 month (FU1) after chemoradiation.

Methods and Materials

Histologically confirmed patients with HGG were planned for 6 weeks of RT in a prospective study for adaptive RT planning. All patients underwent postoperative MRI, MRsim, and follow-up MRI scans every 2 to 3 months. Tumor response was assessed by 3 independent blinded reviewers using Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria when baseline was either postoperative MRI or MRsim. Interobserver agreement was calculated using Light's kappa.

Results

Thirty patients (median age, 60.5 years; IQR, 54.5-66.3) were included. Median interval between surgery and RT was 34 days (IQR, 27-41). Response assessment at FU1 differed in 17 patients (57%) when the baseline was postoperative MRI versus MRsim, including true progression versus partial response or stable disease in 11 (37%) and stable disease versus partial response in 6 (20%) patients. True progression was reported in 19 patients (63.3%) on FU1 when the baseline was postoperative MRI versus 8 patients (26.7%) when the baseline was MRsim (P = .004). Pseudoprogression was observed at FU1 in 12 (40%) versus 4 (13%) patients, when the baseline was postoperative MRI versus MRsim (P = .019). Interobserver agreement between observers was moderate (κ = 0.579; P < .001).

Conclusions

Our study demonstrates the value of acquiring an updated MR closer to RT in patients with HGG to improve response assessment, and accuracy in evaluation of pseudoprogression even at the early time point of first follow-up after RT. Earlier identification of patients with true progression would enable more timely salvage treatments including potential clinical trial enrollment to improve patient outcomes.