利用二维视频图像和姿势估计人工智能估算单腿着地时的垂直地面反作用力

Physical therapy research Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-26 DOI:10.1298/ptr.E10276
Tomoya Ishida, Takumi Ino, Yoshiki Yamakawa, Naofumi Wada, Yuta Koshino, Mina Samukawa, Satoshi Kasahara, Harukazu Tohyama
{"title":"利用二维视频图像和姿势估计人工智能估算单腿着地时的垂直地面反作用力","authors":"Tomoya Ishida, Takumi Ino, Yoshiki Yamakawa, Naofumi Wada, Yuta Koshino, Mina Samukawa, Satoshi Kasahara, Harukazu Tohyama","doi":"10.1298/ptr.E10276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Assessment of the vertical ground reaction force (VGRF) during landing tasks is crucial for physical therapy in sports. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the VGRF during a single-leg landing can be estimated from a two-dimensional (2D) video image and pose estimation artificial intelligence (AI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighteen healthy male participants (age: 23.0 ± 1.6 years) performed a single-leg landing task from a 30-cm height. The VGRF was measured using a force plate and estimated using center of mass (COM) position data from a 2D video image with pose estimation AI (2D-AI) and three-dimensional optical motion capture (3D-Mocap). The measured and estimated peak VGRFs were compared using a paired <i>t</i>-test and Pearson's correlation coefficient. The absolute errors of the peak VGRF were also compared between the two estimations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant difference in the peak VGRF was found between the force plate measured VGRF and the 2D-AI or 3D-Mocap estimated VGRF (force plate: 3.37 ± 0.42 body weight [BW], 2D-AI: 3.32 ± 0.42 BW, 3D-Mocap: 3.50 ± 0.42 BW). There was no significant difference in the absolute error of the peak VGRF between the 2D-AI and 3D-Mocap estimations (2D-AI: 0.20 ± 0.16 BW, 3D-Mocap: 0.13 ± 0.09 BW, <i>P</i> = 0.163). The measured peak VGRF was significantly correlated with the estimated peak by 2D-AI (<i>R</i> = 0.835, <i>P</i> <0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study indicate that peak VGRF estimation using 2D video images and pose estimation AI is useful for the clinical assessment of single-leg landing.</p>","PeriodicalId":74445,"journal":{"name":"Physical therapy research","volume":"27 1","pages":"35-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11057390/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimation of Vertical Ground Reaction Force during Single-leg Landing Using Two-dimensional Video Images and Pose Estimation Artificial Intelligence.\",\"authors\":\"Tomoya Ishida, Takumi Ino, Yoshiki Yamakawa, Naofumi Wada, Yuta Koshino, Mina Samukawa, Satoshi Kasahara, Harukazu Tohyama\",\"doi\":\"10.1298/ptr.E10276\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Assessment of the vertical ground reaction force (VGRF) during landing tasks is crucial for physical therapy in sports. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the VGRF during a single-leg landing can be estimated from a two-dimensional (2D) video image and pose estimation artificial intelligence (AI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighteen healthy male participants (age: 23.0 ± 1.6 years) performed a single-leg landing task from a 30-cm height. The VGRF was measured using a force plate and estimated using center of mass (COM) position data from a 2D video image with pose estimation AI (2D-AI) and three-dimensional optical motion capture (3D-Mocap). The measured and estimated peak VGRFs were compared using a paired <i>t</i>-test and Pearson's correlation coefficient. The absolute errors of the peak VGRF were also compared between the two estimations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant difference in the peak VGRF was found between the force plate measured VGRF and the 2D-AI or 3D-Mocap estimated VGRF (force plate: 3.37 ± 0.42 body weight [BW], 2D-AI: 3.32 ± 0.42 BW, 3D-Mocap: 3.50 ± 0.42 BW). There was no significant difference in the absolute error of the peak VGRF between the 2D-AI and 3D-Mocap estimations (2D-AI: 0.20 ± 0.16 BW, 3D-Mocap: 0.13 ± 0.09 BW, <i>P</i> = 0.163). The measured peak VGRF was significantly correlated with the estimated peak by 2D-AI (<i>R</i> = 0.835, <i>P</i> <0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study indicate that peak VGRF estimation using 2D video images and pose estimation AI is useful for the clinical assessment of single-leg landing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74445,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physical therapy research\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"35-41\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11057390/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physical therapy research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1298/ptr.E10276\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical therapy research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1298/ptr.E10276","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估着陆任务中的垂直地面反作用力(VGRF)对于运动中的物理治疗至关重要。本研究旨在确定能否通过二维(2D)视频图像和姿势估计人工智能(AI)估算单腿着地时的 VGRF:18名健康男性参与者(年龄:23.0 ± 1.6岁)从30厘米的高度进行了单腿着地任务。使用测力板测量 VGRF,并利用二维视频图像中的质心(COM)位置数据和姿势估计人工智能(2D-AI)以及三维光学运动捕捉(3D-Mocap)估算 VGRF。使用配对 t 检验和皮尔逊相关系数比较了测量和估算的 VGRF 峰值。此外,还比较了两种估计值的峰值 VGRF 绝对误差:结果:测力板测量的 VGRF 与 2D-AI 或 3D-Mocap 估算的 VGRF 之间在峰值上没有发现明显差异(测力板:3.37 ± 0.42 体重;2D-AI:3.37 ± 0.42 体重):3.37 ± 0.42 体重[BW],2D-AI:3.32 ± 0.42 体重,3D-Mocap:3.50 ± 0.42 体重[BW]:3.50 ± 0.42 体重)。2D-AI 和 3D-Mocap 估算的峰值 VGRF 绝对误差无明显差异(2D-AI:0.20 ± 0.16 体重,3D-Mocap:0.13 ± 0.09 体重,P = 0.163)。测得的 VGRF 峰值与 2D-AI 估算的峰值有明显相关性(R = 0.835,P 结论):本研究结果表明,使用二维视频图像和姿势估计人工智能估算 VGRF 峰值可用于单腿着地的临床评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Estimation of Vertical Ground Reaction Force during Single-leg Landing Using Two-dimensional Video Images and Pose Estimation Artificial Intelligence.

Objective: Assessment of the vertical ground reaction force (VGRF) during landing tasks is crucial for physical therapy in sports. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the VGRF during a single-leg landing can be estimated from a two-dimensional (2D) video image and pose estimation artificial intelligence (AI).

Methods: Eighteen healthy male participants (age: 23.0 ± 1.6 years) performed a single-leg landing task from a 30-cm height. The VGRF was measured using a force plate and estimated using center of mass (COM) position data from a 2D video image with pose estimation AI (2D-AI) and three-dimensional optical motion capture (3D-Mocap). The measured and estimated peak VGRFs were compared using a paired t-test and Pearson's correlation coefficient. The absolute errors of the peak VGRF were also compared between the two estimations.

Results: No significant difference in the peak VGRF was found between the force plate measured VGRF and the 2D-AI or 3D-Mocap estimated VGRF (force plate: 3.37 ± 0.42 body weight [BW], 2D-AI: 3.32 ± 0.42 BW, 3D-Mocap: 3.50 ± 0.42 BW). There was no significant difference in the absolute error of the peak VGRF between the 2D-AI and 3D-Mocap estimations (2D-AI: 0.20 ± 0.16 BW, 3D-Mocap: 0.13 ± 0.09 BW, P = 0.163). The measured peak VGRF was significantly correlated with the estimated peak by 2D-AI (R = 0.835, P <0.001).

Conclusion: The results of this study indicate that peak VGRF estimation using 2D video images and pose estimation AI is useful for the clinical assessment of single-leg landing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Anatomical Risk Factors for Lower Extremity Musculoskeletal Disorders and Proposed Prevention Strategies. Effects of Repetitive Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation on Hemodynamics Compared to Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation. Recovery of Physical Function in a Patient with Intensive Care Unit-acquired Weakness after Valvular Surgery: A Case Report. Predictive Sub-items and Cutoff Scores of the Functional Assessment for Control of Trunk (FACT) for Gait Independence in Patients with Acute Stroke. Is There a Difference in Factors Affecting Rest Pain and Pain Intensity during Movement at 1 Year Post-total Knee Arthroplasty?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1