纤维肌痛患者对面对面或虚拟教育的偏好:一家学术医疗中心的横断面调查研究。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Pain Management Nursing Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.pmn.2024.03.007
{"title":"纤维肌痛患者对面对面或虚拟教育的偏好:一家学术医疗中心的横断面调查研究。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.pmn.2024.03.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Patient education is a core component of treating fibromyalgia<span> and central sensitization disorders. We sought to evaluate whether patients with fibromyalgia prefer virtual or in-person educational classes as part of their treatment program, identify underlying factors with their educational modality choice, and highlight benefits or barriers associated with in-person or online educational sessions.</span></p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>A cross-sectional survey with a qualitative feedback component was utilized.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A voluntary, anonymous survey was distributed to all participants (in-person and virtual) of the fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue clinic treatment program from October 2021 through March 2022.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In total 90 participants completed the survey. Nearly all (94%) agreed that the pathophysiologic education was relevant and valuable and (98%) agreed to feeling confident with implementing management strategies. Perceived connection between the participants varied between groups (85% of in-person vs 48% of online; <em>p</em> &lt; .001), as did perceived engagement (100% of in-person vs 71% of online; <em>p</em> = .001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Patients value education and find it useful in treating fibromyalgia, regardless of the educational modality. The online group reported more limitations including less engagement, class participation, and connection with peers.</p></div><div><h3>Clinical Implications</h3><p>As virtual education platforms become more widely available and may be easier to access than in-person options, it is important to understand patient preferences, benefits, and disadvantages of educational modalities to ensure education and patient outcomes remain equitable.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19959,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In-Person or Virtual Educational Preferences in Patients With Fibromyalgia: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study at an Academic Medical Center\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pmn.2024.03.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Patient education is a core component of treating fibromyalgia<span> and central sensitization disorders. We sought to evaluate whether patients with fibromyalgia prefer virtual or in-person educational classes as part of their treatment program, identify underlying factors with their educational modality choice, and highlight benefits or barriers associated with in-person or online educational sessions.</span></p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>A cross-sectional survey with a qualitative feedback component was utilized.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A voluntary, anonymous survey was distributed to all participants (in-person and virtual) of the fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue clinic treatment program from October 2021 through March 2022.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In total 90 participants completed the survey. Nearly all (94%) agreed that the pathophysiologic education was relevant and valuable and (98%) agreed to feeling confident with implementing management strategies. Perceived connection between the participants varied between groups (85% of in-person vs 48% of online; <em>p</em> &lt; .001), as did perceived engagement (100% of in-person vs 71% of online; <em>p</em> = .001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Patients value education and find it useful in treating fibromyalgia, regardless of the educational modality. The online group reported more limitations including less engagement, class participation, and connection with peers.</p></div><div><h3>Clinical Implications</h3><p>As virtual education platforms become more widely available and may be easier to access than in-person options, it is important to understand patient preferences, benefits, and disadvantages of educational modalities to ensure education and patient outcomes remain equitable.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain Management Nursing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain Management Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1524904224001048\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Management Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1524904224001048","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:患者教育是治疗纤维肌痛和中枢过敏性疾病的核心组成部分。我们试图评估纤维肌痛患者是否更喜欢虚拟或面对面的教育课程作为其治疗计划的一部分,确定他们选择教育方式的潜在因素,并强调与面对面或在线教育课程相关的益处或障碍:设计:采用带有定性反馈部分的横断面调查:方法:在 2021 年 10 月至 2022 年 3 月期间,向纤维肌痛和慢性疲劳诊所治疗项目的所有参与者(现场和虚拟)发放自愿匿名调查:共有 90 名参与者完成了调查。几乎所有参与者(94%)都认为病理生理学教育具有相关性和价值,并且(98%)认为有信心实施管理策略。各组参与者之间的联系感不同(85% 的现场参与者对 48% 的在线参与者;p < .001),参与感也不同(100% 的现场参与者对 71% 的在线参与者;p = .001):无论采用哪种教育方式,患者都重视教育,并认为教育对治疗纤维肌痛很有用。在线组报告了更多的限制因素,包括参与度较低、课堂参与度较低以及与同伴的联系较少:临床意义:随着虚拟教育平台越来越广泛,而且可能比面对面教育更容易获得,了解患者对教育模式的偏好、益处和弊端以确保教育和患者治疗效果保持公平非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
In-Person or Virtual Educational Preferences in Patients With Fibromyalgia: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study at an Academic Medical Center

Purpose

Patient education is a core component of treating fibromyalgia and central sensitization disorders. We sought to evaluate whether patients with fibromyalgia prefer virtual or in-person educational classes as part of their treatment program, identify underlying factors with their educational modality choice, and highlight benefits or barriers associated with in-person or online educational sessions.

Design

A cross-sectional survey with a qualitative feedback component was utilized.

Methods

A voluntary, anonymous survey was distributed to all participants (in-person and virtual) of the fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue clinic treatment program from October 2021 through March 2022.

Results

In total 90 participants completed the survey. Nearly all (94%) agreed that the pathophysiologic education was relevant and valuable and (98%) agreed to feeling confident with implementing management strategies. Perceived connection between the participants varied between groups (85% of in-person vs 48% of online; p < .001), as did perceived engagement (100% of in-person vs 71% of online; p = .001).

Conclusions

Patients value education and find it useful in treating fibromyalgia, regardless of the educational modality. The online group reported more limitations including less engagement, class participation, and connection with peers.

Clinical Implications

As virtual education platforms become more widely available and may be easier to access than in-person options, it is important to understand patient preferences, benefits, and disadvantages of educational modalities to ensure education and patient outcomes remain equitable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Management Nursing
Pain Management Nursing 医学-护理
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
187
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This peer-reviewed journal offers a unique focus on the realm of pain management as it applies to nursing. Original and review articles from experts in the field offer key insights in the areas of clinical practice, advocacy, education, administration, and research. Additional features include practice guidelines and pharmacology updates.
期刊最新文献
A Scoping Review of Social Determinants of Health and Pain Outcomes in Sickle Cell Disease. Pain Self-Management in Individuals With Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain During Lebanon's Overlapping Crises. Implementation of a Quality Improvement Learning Collaborative to Support Implementation of the 2016 CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain: Case Study from Nurse-Led Clinics. Effects of Monochromatic Infrared Light on Painful Diabetic Polyneuropathy: Randomized Controlled Trial. The Association Between Respiratory Functions, Pain Tolerance and Body Awareness in Obstructive Lung Diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1