Yasmin Abaza, Christine McMahon, Jacqueline S Garcia
{"title":"治疗急性髓细胞白血病的进展与挑战。","authors":"Yasmin Abaza, Christine McMahon, Jacqueline S Garcia","doi":"10.1200/EDBK_438662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The therapeutic arsenal for the management of AML has expanded significantly in recent years. Before 2017, newly diagnosed AML was treated with either standard cytarabine- and anthracycline-based induction chemotherapy (for all fit patients) or a single-agent hypomethylating agent (in unfit patients or those 75 years and older). While assessing patient fitness remains important, characterizing the disease biology has become critical to select the optimal initial therapy for each patient with more options available. FLT3 inhibitors, gemtuzumab ozogamicin, and CPX-351 have been shown to improve outcomes for specific subsets of patients. Venetoclax (VEN) with a hypomethylating agent (HMA) is the standard-of-care frontline regimen for most older patients, except perhaps for those with an IDH1 mutation where ivosidenib with azacitidine may also be considered. On the basis of the success seen with HMA/VEN in older patients, there is now increasing interest in incorporating VEN into frontline regimens in younger patients, with promising data from multiple early phase studies. This article focuses on recent updates and ongoing challenges in the management of AML, with a particular focus on the ongoing challenge of secondary AML and considerations regarding the selection of initial therapy in younger patients. An overview of common side effects and toxicities associated with targeted therapies is also presented here, along with recommended strategies to mitigate these risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":37969,"journal":{"name":"American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book / ASCO. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Meeting","volume":"44 3","pages":"e438662"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advancements and Challenges in the Treatment of AML.\",\"authors\":\"Yasmin Abaza, Christine McMahon, Jacqueline S Garcia\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/EDBK_438662\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The therapeutic arsenal for the management of AML has expanded significantly in recent years. Before 2017, newly diagnosed AML was treated with either standard cytarabine- and anthracycline-based induction chemotherapy (for all fit patients) or a single-agent hypomethylating agent (in unfit patients or those 75 years and older). While assessing patient fitness remains important, characterizing the disease biology has become critical to select the optimal initial therapy for each patient with more options available. FLT3 inhibitors, gemtuzumab ozogamicin, and CPX-351 have been shown to improve outcomes for specific subsets of patients. Venetoclax (VEN) with a hypomethylating agent (HMA) is the standard-of-care frontline regimen for most older patients, except perhaps for those with an IDH1 mutation where ivosidenib with azacitidine may also be considered. On the basis of the success seen with HMA/VEN in older patients, there is now increasing interest in incorporating VEN into frontline regimens in younger patients, with promising data from multiple early phase studies. This article focuses on recent updates and ongoing challenges in the management of AML, with a particular focus on the ongoing challenge of secondary AML and considerations regarding the selection of initial therapy in younger patients. An overview of common side effects and toxicities associated with targeted therapies is also presented here, along with recommended strategies to mitigate these risks.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37969,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book / ASCO. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Meeting\",\"volume\":\"44 3\",\"pages\":\"e438662\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book / ASCO. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Meeting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/EDBK_438662\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book / ASCO. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Meeting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/EDBK_438662","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
近年来,治疗急性髓细胞性白血病的药物库已大幅扩充。2017年以前,新诊断的急性髓细胞白血病患者要么接受标准的细胞抑制剂和蒽环类诱导化疗(适用于所有体质良好的患者),要么接受单药低甲基化药物治疗(适用于体质不佳或75岁及以上的患者)。虽然评估患者体质仍然很重要,但随着可供选择的治疗方案越来越多,确定疾病生物学特征对于为每位患者选择最佳初始疗法也变得至关重要。FLT3 抑制剂、gemtuzumab ozogamicin 和 CPX-351 已被证明可改善特定亚组患者的预后。Venetoclax(VEN)与低甲基化药物(HMA)是大多数老年患者的一线标准治疗方案,但对于那些有IDH1基因突变的患者,或许也可以考虑使用ivosidenib与阿扎胞苷。基于 HMA/VEN 在老年患者中取得的成功,现在越来越多的人开始关注将 VEN 纳入年轻患者的一线治疗方案中,多项早期研究的数据令人鼓舞。本文重点介绍急性髓细胞性白血病治疗的最新进展和目前面临的挑战,尤其关注继发性急性髓细胞性白血病目前面临的挑战以及年轻患者选择初始疗法的注意事项。本文还概述了与靶向疗法相关的常见副作用和毒性,以及降低这些风险的建议策略。
Advancements and Challenges in the Treatment of AML.
The therapeutic arsenal for the management of AML has expanded significantly in recent years. Before 2017, newly diagnosed AML was treated with either standard cytarabine- and anthracycline-based induction chemotherapy (for all fit patients) or a single-agent hypomethylating agent (in unfit patients or those 75 years and older). While assessing patient fitness remains important, characterizing the disease biology has become critical to select the optimal initial therapy for each patient with more options available. FLT3 inhibitors, gemtuzumab ozogamicin, and CPX-351 have been shown to improve outcomes for specific subsets of patients. Venetoclax (VEN) with a hypomethylating agent (HMA) is the standard-of-care frontline regimen for most older patients, except perhaps for those with an IDH1 mutation where ivosidenib with azacitidine may also be considered. On the basis of the success seen with HMA/VEN in older patients, there is now increasing interest in incorporating VEN into frontline regimens in younger patients, with promising data from multiple early phase studies. This article focuses on recent updates and ongoing challenges in the management of AML, with a particular focus on the ongoing challenge of secondary AML and considerations regarding the selection of initial therapy in younger patients. An overview of common side effects and toxicities associated with targeted therapies is also presented here, along with recommended strategies to mitigate these risks.
期刊介绍:
The Ed Book is a National Library of Medicine–indexed collection of articles written by ASCO Annual Meeting faculty and invited leaders in oncology. Ed Book was launched in 1985 to highlight standards of care and inspire future therapeutic possibilities in oncology. Published annually, each volume highlights the most compelling research and developments across the multidisciplinary fields of oncology and serves as an enduring scholarly resource for all members of the cancer care team long after the Meeting concludes. These articles address issues in the following areas, among others: Immuno-oncology, Surgical, radiation, and medical oncology, Clinical informatics and quality of care, Global health, Survivorship.