远程医疗与社交媒体:对网民分享最多内容的当代分析。

IF 1.4 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia Pub Date : 2024-04-03 DOI:10.4081/aiua.2024.11206
Vincenzo Mirone, Francesco Di Bello, Simone Morra, Gianluigi Califano, Luigi Cirillo, Marco Abate, Giovanni Maria Fusco, Stefano Luzzago, Claudia Mirone, Luigi Napolitano, Roberto La Rocca, Massimiliano Creta, Giuseppe Celentano, Marco Capece, Gennaro Musi, Francesco Mangiapia, Nicola Longo, Claudia Collà Ruvolo
{"title":"远程医疗与社交媒体:对网民分享最多内容的当代分析。","authors":"Vincenzo Mirone, Francesco Di Bello, Simone Morra, Gianluigi Califano, Luigi Cirillo, Marco Abate, Giovanni Maria Fusco, Stefano Luzzago, Claudia Mirone, Luigi Napolitano, Roberto La Rocca, Massimiliano Creta, Giuseppe Celentano, Marco Capece, Gennaro Musi, Francesco Mangiapia, Nicola Longo, Claudia Collà Ruvolo","doi":"10.4081/aiua.2024.11206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the telemedicine information published on the most popular social media platforms, during the second year of the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We queried the BuzzSumo tool to identify related telemedicine article links that were shared most on social media, from February 2021 to February 2022. The PEMAT-P was used for the quality assessment of the most shared links.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>125 links were eligible for the analysis. Facebook was the most used social media platform for sharing articles (median engagement: 1000). Most of the articles were published by magazines (n = 82, 65.6%) and the main topic addressed was general information (n = 49, 39.2%). In the subgroup analyses of the 34 most shared articles, Facebook was the most used social media platform (median engagement:1950), most of the articles were published by magazines (n = 24, 70.6%), whereas the main topic addressed was the prescription of the abortion pill (n = 9, 26.5%). According to the PEMAT-P tool, the median understandability and actionability score was 63.8 and 20%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The interest in telemedicine has increased all over the world, as evidenced by the high engagement in social media articles, recorded during the last year. However, the access to digital health services is still limited, the information provided is often not verified by an official entity and unable to fill the digital divide exacerbated by COVID 19 pandemic crisis. Hence, health policy should be developed or modified to ensure a more egalitarian Internet access for all citizens. Official medical institutions should standardize telemedicine regulation and online content to reduce the widespread of misleading information.</p>","PeriodicalId":46900,"journal":{"name":"Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Telemedicine and social media: A contemporary analysis of the most shared content by internet users.\",\"authors\":\"Vincenzo Mirone, Francesco Di Bello, Simone Morra, Gianluigi Califano, Luigi Cirillo, Marco Abate, Giovanni Maria Fusco, Stefano Luzzago, Claudia Mirone, Luigi Napolitano, Roberto La Rocca, Massimiliano Creta, Giuseppe Celentano, Marco Capece, Gennaro Musi, Francesco Mangiapia, Nicola Longo, Claudia Collà Ruvolo\",\"doi\":\"10.4081/aiua.2024.11206\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the telemedicine information published on the most popular social media platforms, during the second year of the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We queried the BuzzSumo tool to identify related telemedicine article links that were shared most on social media, from February 2021 to February 2022. The PEMAT-P was used for the quality assessment of the most shared links.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>125 links were eligible for the analysis. Facebook was the most used social media platform for sharing articles (median engagement: 1000). Most of the articles were published by magazines (n = 82, 65.6%) and the main topic addressed was general information (n = 49, 39.2%). In the subgroup analyses of the 34 most shared articles, Facebook was the most used social media platform (median engagement:1950), most of the articles were published by magazines (n = 24, 70.6%), whereas the main topic addressed was the prescription of the abortion pill (n = 9, 26.5%). According to the PEMAT-P tool, the median understandability and actionability score was 63.8 and 20%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The interest in telemedicine has increased all over the world, as evidenced by the high engagement in social media articles, recorded during the last year. However, the access to digital health services is still limited, the information provided is often not verified by an official entity and unable to fill the digital divide exacerbated by COVID 19 pandemic crisis. Hence, health policy should be developed or modified to ensure a more egalitarian Internet access for all citizens. Official medical institutions should standardize telemedicine regulation and online content to reduce the widespread of misleading information.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46900,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2024.11206\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2024.11206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估 COVID-19 大流行第二年期间在最受欢迎的社交媒体平台上发布的远程医疗信息:评估 COVID-19 大流行第二年期间在最受欢迎的社交媒体平台上发布的远程医疗信息:我们查询了 BuzzSumo 工具,以确定 2021 年 2 月至 2022 年 2 月期间在社交媒体上被分享最多的相关远程医疗文章链接。结果:125 个链接符合分析条件:125 个链接符合分析条件。Facebook 是分享文章最多的社交媒体平台(参与度中位数:1000)。大多数文章是由杂志发表的(n = 82,65.6%),涉及的主要话题是一般信息(n = 49,39.2%)。在对 34 篇分享次数最多的文章进行的分组分析中,Facebook 是使用最多的社交媒体平台(参与度中位数:1950),大多数文章由杂志发表(n = 24,70.6%),而涉及的主要话题是堕胎药处方(n = 9,26.5%)。根据 PEMAT-P 工具,可理解性和可操作性的中位数分别为 63.8 分和 20%:全世界对远程医疗的兴趣与日俱增,去年社交媒体文章的高参与度就证明了这一点。然而,获得数字医疗服务的途径仍然有限,所提供的信息往往未经官方实体核实,无法填补因 COVID 19 大流行危机而加剧的数字鸿沟。因此,应制定或修改卫生政策,确保所有公民都能更平等地使用互联网。官方医疗机构应规范远程医疗监管和在线内容,以减少误导性信息的泛滥。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Telemedicine and social media: A contemporary analysis of the most shared content by internet users.

Objective: To evaluate the telemedicine information published on the most popular social media platforms, during the second year of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: We queried the BuzzSumo tool to identify related telemedicine article links that were shared most on social media, from February 2021 to February 2022. The PEMAT-P was used for the quality assessment of the most shared links.

Results: 125 links were eligible for the analysis. Facebook was the most used social media platform for sharing articles (median engagement: 1000). Most of the articles were published by magazines (n = 82, 65.6%) and the main topic addressed was general information (n = 49, 39.2%). In the subgroup analyses of the 34 most shared articles, Facebook was the most used social media platform (median engagement:1950), most of the articles were published by magazines (n = 24, 70.6%), whereas the main topic addressed was the prescription of the abortion pill (n = 9, 26.5%). According to the PEMAT-P tool, the median understandability and actionability score was 63.8 and 20%, respectively.

Conclusions: The interest in telemedicine has increased all over the world, as evidenced by the high engagement in social media articles, recorded during the last year. However, the access to digital health services is still limited, the information provided is often not verified by an official entity and unable to fill the digital divide exacerbated by COVID 19 pandemic crisis. Hence, health policy should be developed or modified to ensure a more egalitarian Internet access for all citizens. Official medical institutions should standardize telemedicine regulation and online content to reduce the widespread of misleading information.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
35.70%
发文量
72
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
"Bottoms-up" minimally-invasive approach to inguinal lymph node dissection for penile cancer management. A single-center comparative study versus open approach and review. A systematic review and meta-analysis of short- and long-term complications of early versus delayed penile prosthesis implantation in patients with ischemic priapism. Adverse events related to laser fibers and laser machines during ureteroscopy and stone lithotripsy: Insights from an updated 10-year analysis of the US MAUDE database. Can serum 17-hydroxy progesterone predict an improvement in semen parameters following micro-varicocelectomy? A prospective study. CFTR Exon 10 deleterious mutations in patients with congenital bilateral absence of vas deferens in a cohort of Pakistani patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1