在非手术腕管综合征治疗中,5%葡萄糖硬膜外注射与皮质类固醇注射的比较。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Ideggyogyaszati Szemle-Clinical Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-03-30 DOI:10.18071/isz.77.0121
Ocek Ozge, Guner Derya
{"title":"在非手术腕管综合征治疗中,5%葡萄糖硬膜外注射与皮质类固醇注射的比较。","authors":"Ocek Ozge, Guner Derya","doi":"10.18071/isz.77.0121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong><p>We aimed to investigate the difference of clinical and electrophysiological improvement between perineural corticosteroid injection therapy (PCIT) and perineural 5% dextrose injection therapy (5%PDIT) in carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).</p>.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong><p>Total of 92 wrists that were diagnosed as mild-to-moderate idiopathic CTS and completed their follow-up were included in our study. The severity of pain, symptom severity and functional status were asses&shy;sed by visual analog scale (VAS) and the Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire (BCTQ) scores for treatment effectiveness. Randomized wrists were administered PCIT or 5%PDIT accompanied by ultrasound guidance. VAS, BCTQ scores and the electro&shy;physiological study repeated before and after treatment at the 1st and 6th months after perineural injection therapies (PITs) were recorded.</p>.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong><p>Compared with baseline data, within groups there was significant improvement in VAS, BCTQ severity and function scores at 1st and 6th months follow-up (all p &lt; 0.001). Considerable advance were detected in the median sensory nerve conduction velocity (SNCV) when pretreatment values were compared with posttreatment first month in both groups (p = 0.01; p &lt; 0.001, respectively). No significant change occurred in median distal motor latency (DML) values between the 1st and 6th months in the groups (p = 0.095; p = 0.113, respectively). No significant difference was observed bet&shy;ween 5%PDIT and PCIT groups.</p>.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong><p>Clinical and electrophysiologic improvement in CTS began from 1st month after PCIT and 5%PDIT. At the 6th month follow-up of the patients, 5%PDIT and PCIT had similar therapeutic effects. As a result, we can consider the replacement of PCIT with 5%PDIT in mild-to-moderate CTS patients especially in those who are hesitant because of the corticosteroid&rsquo;s adverse effects.</p>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50394,"journal":{"name":"Ideggyogyaszati Szemle-Clinical Neuroscience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perineural 5% dextrose versus corticosteroid injection in non-surgical carpal tunnel syndrom treatment.\",\"authors\":\"Ocek Ozge, Guner Derya\",\"doi\":\"10.18071/isz.77.0121\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong><p>We aimed to investigate the difference of clinical and electrophysiological improvement between perineural corticosteroid injection therapy (PCIT) and perineural 5% dextrose injection therapy (5%PDIT) in carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).</p>.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong><p>Total of 92 wrists that were diagnosed as mild-to-moderate idiopathic CTS and completed their follow-up were included in our study. The severity of pain, symptom severity and functional status were asses&shy;sed by visual analog scale (VAS) and the Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire (BCTQ) scores for treatment effectiveness. Randomized wrists were administered PCIT or 5%PDIT accompanied by ultrasound guidance. VAS, BCTQ scores and the electro&shy;physiological study repeated before and after treatment at the 1st and 6th months after perineural injection therapies (PITs) were recorded.</p>.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong><p>Compared with baseline data, within groups there was significant improvement in VAS, BCTQ severity and function scores at 1st and 6th months follow-up (all p &lt; 0.001). Considerable advance were detected in the median sensory nerve conduction velocity (SNCV) when pretreatment values were compared with posttreatment first month in both groups (p = 0.01; p &lt; 0.001, respectively). No significant change occurred in median distal motor latency (DML) values between the 1st and 6th months in the groups (p = 0.095; p = 0.113, respectively). No significant difference was observed bet&shy;ween 5%PDIT and PCIT groups.</p>.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong><p>Clinical and electrophysiologic improvement in CTS began from 1st month after PCIT and 5%PDIT. At the 6th month follow-up of the patients, 5%PDIT and PCIT had similar therapeutic effects. As a result, we can consider the replacement of PCIT with 5%PDIT in mild-to-moderate CTS patients especially in those who are hesitant because of the corticosteroid&rsquo;s adverse effects.</p>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50394,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ideggyogyaszati Szemle-Clinical Neuroscience\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ideggyogyaszati Szemle-Clinical Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18071/isz.77.0121\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ideggyogyaszati Szemle-Clinical Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18071/isz.77.0121","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:我们的目的是研究腕管综合征(CTS)的硬膜外皮质类固醇注射疗法(PCIT)和硬膜外5%葡萄糖注射疗法(5%PDIT)在临床和电生理改善方面的差异:本研究共纳入 92 例被诊断为轻度至中度特发性腕管综合征并完成随访的患者。通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)和波士顿腕管综合征问卷(BCTQ)评分评估疼痛严重程度、症状严重程度和功能状态,以确定治疗效果。在超声引导下,随机对腕部进行 PCIT 或 5%PDIT 治疗。记录VAS、BCTQ评分以及在围神经注射疗法(PITs)后第1个月和第6个月治疗前后重复进行的电生理研究:结果:与基线数据相比,在随访的第 1 个月和第 6 个月,各组的 VAS、BCTQ 严重程度和功能评分均有显著改善(均为 p <0.001)。两组患者的正中感觉神经传导速度(SNCV)在治疗前的数值与治疗后第一个月的数值相比均有明显提高(分别为 p = 0.01;p < 0.001)。两组患者第 1 个月和第 6 个月的远端运动潜伏期(DML)中值无明显变化(分别为 p = 0.095;p = 0.113)。5%PDIT组和PCIT组之间无明显差异:PCIT和5%PDIT治疗后1个月,CTS的临床和电生理症状开始改善。在对患者的第 6 个月随访中,5%PDIT 和 PCIT 的治疗效果相似。因此,我们可以考虑在轻度至中度 CTS 患者中用 5%PDIT 取代 PCIT,尤其是那些因皮质类固醇的不良反应而犹豫不决的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Perineural 5% dextrose versus corticosteroid injection in non-surgical carpal tunnel syndrom treatment.

Background and purpose:

We aimed to investigate the difference of clinical and electrophysiological improvement between perineural corticosteroid injection therapy (PCIT) and perineural 5% dextrose injection therapy (5%PDIT) in carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).

.

Methods:

Total of 92 wrists that were diagnosed as mild-to-moderate idiopathic CTS and completed their follow-up were included in our study. The severity of pain, symptom severity and functional status were asses­sed by visual analog scale (VAS) and the Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire (BCTQ) scores for treatment effectiveness. Randomized wrists were administered PCIT or 5%PDIT accompanied by ultrasound guidance. VAS, BCTQ scores and the electro­physiological study repeated before and after treatment at the 1st and 6th months after perineural injection therapies (PITs) were recorded.

.

Results:

Compared with baseline data, within groups there was significant improvement in VAS, BCTQ severity and function scores at 1st and 6th months follow-up (all p < 0.001). Considerable advance were detected in the median sensory nerve conduction velocity (SNCV) when pretreatment values were compared with posttreatment first month in both groups (p = 0.01; p < 0.001, respectively). No significant change occurred in median distal motor latency (DML) values between the 1st and 6th months in the groups (p = 0.095; p = 0.113, respectively). No significant difference was observed bet­ween 5%PDIT and PCIT groups.

.

Conclusion:

Clinical and electrophysiologic improvement in CTS began from 1st month after PCIT and 5%PDIT. At the 6th month follow-up of the patients, 5%PDIT and PCIT had similar therapeutic effects. As a result, we can consider the replacement of PCIT with 5%PDIT in mild-to-moderate CTS patients especially in those who are hesitant because of the corticosteroid’s adverse effects.

.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ideggyogyaszati Szemle-Clinical Neuroscience
Ideggyogyaszati Szemle-Clinical Neuroscience CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of Clinical Neuroscience (Ideggyógyászati Szemle) is to provide a forum for the exchange of clinical and scientific information for a multidisciplinary community. The Clinical Neuroscience will be of primary interest to neurologists, neurosurgeons, psychiatrist and clinical specialized psycholigists, neuroradiologists and clinical neurophysiologists, but original works in basic or computer science, epidemiology, pharmacology, etc., relating to the clinical practice with involvement of the central nervous system are also welcome.
期刊最新文献
[Combined epilepsy with generalized and focal seizures]. [Quality of life in acute ischaemic stroke patients treated with recanalisation]. Effect of inflammatory response before mechanical thrombectomy on prognosis in stroke patients. Evaluating vertebrobasilar insufficiency and Meniere's disease: Insights from cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential and video head impulse test. Predictors of pneumonia in stroke patients with dysphagia: A Turkish study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1