无痛成人和肌肉骨骼疼痛成人运动引起的低痛觉的可靠性和测量误差:系统综述。

IF 1.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Scandinavian Journal of Pain Pub Date : 2024-04-15 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1515/sjpain-2023-0104
Vladimir Aron, David Strul, Henrik Bjarke Vaegter, Laurent Pitance, Susan Armijo-Olivo
{"title":"无痛成人和肌肉骨骼疼痛成人运动引起的低痛觉的可靠性和测量误差:系统综述。","authors":"Vladimir Aron, David Strul, Henrik Bjarke Vaegter, Laurent Pitance, Susan Armijo-Olivo","doi":"10.1515/sjpain-2023-0104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We systematically reviewed the reliability and measurement error of exercise-induced hypoalgesia (EIH) in pain-free adults and in adults with musculoskeletal (MSK) pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched EMBASE, PUBMED, SCOPUS, CINAHL, and PSYCINFO from inception to November 2021 (updated in February 2024). In addition, manual searches of the grey literature were conducted in March 2022, September 2023, and February 2024. The inclusion criteria were as follows: adults - pain-free and with MSK pain - a single bout of exercise (any type) combined with experimental pre-post pain tests, and assessment of the reliability and/or measurement error of EIH. Two independent reviewers selected the studies, assessed their Risk of Bias (RoB) with the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) RoB tool, and graded the individual results (COSMIN modified Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included five studies involving pain-free individuals (<i>n</i> = 168), which were deemed to have an overall \"doubtful\" RoB. No study including adults with MSK pain was found. The following ranges of parameters of reliability and measurement error of EIH were reported: intraclass correlation coefficients: 0-0.61; kappa: 0.01-0.46; standard error of measurement: 30.1-105 kPa and 10.4-21%; smallest detectable changes: 83.54-291.1 kPa and 28.83-58.21%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We concluded, with a very low level of certainty, that the reliability and measurement error of EIH is, in pain-free adults, respectively, \"insufficient\" and \"indeterminate.\" Future studies should focus on people with MSK pain and could consider using tailored exercises, other test modalities than pressure pain threshold, rater/assessor blinding, and strict control of the sources of variations (e.g., participants' expectations).</p>","PeriodicalId":47407,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Pain","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability and measurement error of exercise-induced hypoalgesia in pain-free adults and adults with musculoskeletal pain: A systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Vladimir Aron, David Strul, Henrik Bjarke Vaegter, Laurent Pitance, Susan Armijo-Olivo\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/sjpain-2023-0104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We systematically reviewed the reliability and measurement error of exercise-induced hypoalgesia (EIH) in pain-free adults and in adults with musculoskeletal (MSK) pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched EMBASE, PUBMED, SCOPUS, CINAHL, and PSYCINFO from inception to November 2021 (updated in February 2024). In addition, manual searches of the grey literature were conducted in March 2022, September 2023, and February 2024. The inclusion criteria were as follows: adults - pain-free and with MSK pain - a single bout of exercise (any type) combined with experimental pre-post pain tests, and assessment of the reliability and/or measurement error of EIH. Two independent reviewers selected the studies, assessed their Risk of Bias (RoB) with the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) RoB tool, and graded the individual results (COSMIN modified Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included five studies involving pain-free individuals (<i>n</i> = 168), which were deemed to have an overall \\\"doubtful\\\" RoB. No study including adults with MSK pain was found. The following ranges of parameters of reliability and measurement error of EIH were reported: intraclass correlation coefficients: 0-0.61; kappa: 0.01-0.46; standard error of measurement: 30.1-105 kPa and 10.4-21%; smallest detectable changes: 83.54-291.1 kPa and 28.83-58.21%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We concluded, with a very low level of certainty, that the reliability and measurement error of EIH is, in pain-free adults, respectively, \\\"insufficient\\\" and \\\"indeterminate.\\\" Future studies should focus on people with MSK pain and could consider using tailored exercises, other test modalities than pressure pain threshold, rater/assessor blinding, and strict control of the sources of variations (e.g., participants' expectations).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Pain\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/sjpain-2023-0104\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/sjpain-2023-0104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的我们系统地研究了运动诱导低痛觉(EIH)在无痛成人和肌肉骨骼(MSK)疼痛成人中的可靠性和测量误差:我们检索了 EMBASE、PUBMED、SCOPUS、CINAHL 和 PSYCINFO 从开始到 2021 年 11 月(2024 年 2 月更新)的数据。此外,还在 2022 年 3 月、2023 年 9 月和 2024 年 2 月对灰色文献进行了人工检索。纳入标准如下:成人--无痛且伴有MSK疼痛--单次运动(任何类型),结合实验前-后疼痛测试,评估EIH的可靠性和/或测量误差。两名独立评审员选择了这些研究,使用基于共识的健康测量仪器选择标准(COSMIN)RoB 工具评估了这些研究的偏倚风险(RoB),并对各项结果进行了分级(COSMIN 修改后的建议评估、开发和评价分级):我们纳入了五项涉及无痛患者(n = 168)的研究,这些研究的总体RoB被认为是 "可疑的"。没有发现包括患有 MSK 疼痛的成年人的研究。报告的 EIH 可靠性和测量误差参数范围如下:类内相关系数:0-0.61;卡帕(kappa):0-0.61:0-0.61;卡帕:0.01-0.46;测量标准误差:30.1-105 kPa:30.1-105 kPa 和 10.4-21%;可检测到的最小变化:83.54-291.1千帕和28.83-58.21%:我们得出的结论是,在无痛的成年人中,EIH 的可靠性和测量误差分别为 "不足 "和 "不确定",但确定性很低。未来的研究应重点关注患有 MSK 疼痛的人群,并可考虑使用定制练习、压力痛阈值以外的其他测试模式、评分者/评估者盲法以及严格控制变异来源(如参与者的期望值)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reliability and measurement error of exercise-induced hypoalgesia in pain-free adults and adults with musculoskeletal pain: A systematic review.

Objectives: We systematically reviewed the reliability and measurement error of exercise-induced hypoalgesia (EIH) in pain-free adults and in adults with musculoskeletal (MSK) pain.

Methods: We searched EMBASE, PUBMED, SCOPUS, CINAHL, and PSYCINFO from inception to November 2021 (updated in February 2024). In addition, manual searches of the grey literature were conducted in March 2022, September 2023, and February 2024. The inclusion criteria were as follows: adults - pain-free and with MSK pain - a single bout of exercise (any type) combined with experimental pre-post pain tests, and assessment of the reliability and/or measurement error of EIH. Two independent reviewers selected the studies, assessed their Risk of Bias (RoB) with the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) RoB tool, and graded the individual results (COSMIN modified Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation).

Results: We included five studies involving pain-free individuals (n = 168), which were deemed to have an overall "doubtful" RoB. No study including adults with MSK pain was found. The following ranges of parameters of reliability and measurement error of EIH were reported: intraclass correlation coefficients: 0-0.61; kappa: 0.01-0.46; standard error of measurement: 30.1-105 kPa and 10.4-21%; smallest detectable changes: 83.54-291.1 kPa and 28.83-58.21%.

Conclusions: We concluded, with a very low level of certainty, that the reliability and measurement error of EIH is, in pain-free adults, respectively, "insufficient" and "indeterminate." Future studies should focus on people with MSK pain and could consider using tailored exercises, other test modalities than pressure pain threshold, rater/assessor blinding, and strict control of the sources of variations (e.g., participants' expectations).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scandinavian Journal of Pain
Scandinavian Journal of Pain CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
73
期刊最新文献
Dimensionality, reliability, and validity of the Finnish version of the pain catastrophizing scale in chronic low back pain. To speak or not to speak? A secondary data analysis to further explore the context-insensitive avoidance scale. Intrathecal pain treatment for severe pain in patients with terminal cancer: A retrospective analysis of treatment-related complications and side effects. Psychometric evaluation of the Danish version of the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire in patients with subacute and chronic low back pain. The relationship between changes in pain intensity and functional disability in persistent disabling low back pain during a course of cognitive functional therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1