术前使用 Tetragraph™ 放置神经肌肉监测电极的耐受性。

IF 1.3 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-14 DOI:10.4103/sja.sja_864_23
Leah M Espinal, Sidhant Kalsotra, Julie Rice-Weimer, Sibelle A Yemele Kitio, Joseph D Tobias
{"title":"术前使用 Tetragraph™ 放置神经肌肉监测电极的耐受性。","authors":"Leah M Espinal, Sidhant Kalsotra, Julie Rice-Weimer, Sibelle A Yemele Kitio, Joseph D Tobias","doi":"10.4103/sja.sja_864_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Quantitative train-of-four (TOF) monitoring has recently been shown to be feasible in infants and children using a novel electromyography (EMG)-based monitor with a pediatric-sized self-adhesive sensor. However, placement of the sensor and initiation of TOF monitoring may require additional time in the operating room (OR), delaying workflow and the time to induction of anesthesia. The current study evaluates the feasibility of placing the self-adhesive sensor in the preoperative holding area in pediatric patients before arrival to the OR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consented pediatric patients undergoing inpatient surgery requiring the administration of NMBAs were enrolled. The EMG electrode was placed along the ulnar nerve on the volar aspect of the distal forearm to provide neurostimulation. After the induction of anesthesia, monitoring was initiated and TOF recording started before the administration of the NMBA. A Likert score (0-10) was used to assess ease of placement, tolerability of the monitor during the preoperative period, and its ability to generate a recorded response in the OR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final study cohort included 40 patients with a median age of 3.7 years. Fourteen patients (35%) pulled off the sensor before arrival to the OR and 26 patients (65%) arrived at the OR with the sensor intact and functioning. Older children were more likely to maintain the sensor until arrival to the OR compared to younger patients (median age of 5.24 versus 1 year, <i>P</i> = 0.0521). A median age of 3.7 years correlated with an 80% chance of arriving in the OR with the sensor intact. Application ease and tolerance of the sensor were higher in the group that maintained the sensor until OR arrival.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients more than 4 years of age, placement of the self-adhesive sensor for EMG-based TOF monitoring may be feasible. However, in younger patients, additional interventions may be required to achieve a similar success rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":21533,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11033887/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tolerance to preoperative placement of electrodes for neuromuscular monitoring using the Tetragraph™.\",\"authors\":\"Leah M Espinal, Sidhant Kalsotra, Julie Rice-Weimer, Sibelle A Yemele Kitio, Joseph D Tobias\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/sja.sja_864_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Quantitative train-of-four (TOF) monitoring has recently been shown to be feasible in infants and children using a novel electromyography (EMG)-based monitor with a pediatric-sized self-adhesive sensor. However, placement of the sensor and initiation of TOF monitoring may require additional time in the operating room (OR), delaying workflow and the time to induction of anesthesia. The current study evaluates the feasibility of placing the self-adhesive sensor in the preoperative holding area in pediatric patients before arrival to the OR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consented pediatric patients undergoing inpatient surgery requiring the administration of NMBAs were enrolled. The EMG electrode was placed along the ulnar nerve on the volar aspect of the distal forearm to provide neurostimulation. After the induction of anesthesia, monitoring was initiated and TOF recording started before the administration of the NMBA. A Likert score (0-10) was used to assess ease of placement, tolerability of the monitor during the preoperative period, and its ability to generate a recorded response in the OR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final study cohort included 40 patients with a median age of 3.7 years. Fourteen patients (35%) pulled off the sensor before arrival to the OR and 26 patients (65%) arrived at the OR with the sensor intact and functioning. Older children were more likely to maintain the sensor until arrival to the OR compared to younger patients (median age of 5.24 versus 1 year, <i>P</i> = 0.0521). A median age of 3.7 years correlated with an 80% chance of arriving in the OR with the sensor intact. Application ease and tolerance of the sensor were higher in the group that maintained the sensor until OR arrival.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients more than 4 years of age, placement of the self-adhesive sensor for EMG-based TOF monitoring may be feasible. However, in younger patients, additional interventions may be required to achieve a similar success rate.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11033887/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/sja.sja_864_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sja.sja_864_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:最近的研究表明,使用基于肌电图(EMG)的新型监护仪和儿科尺寸的自粘传感器,对婴儿和儿童进行四肢运动(TOF)定量监测是可行的。然而,放置传感器和启动 TOF 监测可能需要在手术室(OR)中花费更多时间,从而延误工作流程和麻醉诱导时间。本研究评估了在儿科患者到达手术室前将自粘传感器放置在术前留置区的可行性:方法:征得同意的儿科患者接受住院手术,需要使用 NMBAs。EMG电极沿着尺神经放置在前臂远端的外侧,以提供神经刺激。麻醉诱导后,在使用 NMBA 之前开始监测并记录 TOF。采用李克特评分法(0-10 分)评估放置的难易程度、术前监护仪的耐受性及其在手术室产生记录反应的能力:最终研究对象包括 40 名患者,中位年龄为 3.7 岁。14名患者(35%)在到达手术室前拔掉了传感器,26名患者(65%)在到达手术室时传感器完好无损并正常工作。与年龄较小的患者相比,年龄较大的患儿更有可能在到达手术室前一直使用传感器(中位年龄为 5.24 岁对 1 岁,P = 0.0521)。中位年龄为 3.7 岁的患儿到达手术室时传感器完好无损的几率为 80%。在到达手术室前一直使用传感器的组别中,传感器的应用难易度和耐受性更高:结论:对于 4 岁以上的患者,使用自粘传感器进行基于肌电图的 TOF 监测是可行的。结论:对于 4 岁以上的患者,使用自粘传感器进行基于肌电图的 TOF 监测是可行的,但对于年龄较小的患者,可能需要额外的干预才能达到类似的成功率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tolerance to preoperative placement of electrodes for neuromuscular monitoring using the Tetragraph™.

Background: Quantitative train-of-four (TOF) monitoring has recently been shown to be feasible in infants and children using a novel electromyography (EMG)-based monitor with a pediatric-sized self-adhesive sensor. However, placement of the sensor and initiation of TOF monitoring may require additional time in the operating room (OR), delaying workflow and the time to induction of anesthesia. The current study evaluates the feasibility of placing the self-adhesive sensor in the preoperative holding area in pediatric patients before arrival to the OR.

Methods: Consented pediatric patients undergoing inpatient surgery requiring the administration of NMBAs were enrolled. The EMG electrode was placed along the ulnar nerve on the volar aspect of the distal forearm to provide neurostimulation. After the induction of anesthesia, monitoring was initiated and TOF recording started before the administration of the NMBA. A Likert score (0-10) was used to assess ease of placement, tolerability of the monitor during the preoperative period, and its ability to generate a recorded response in the OR.

Results: The final study cohort included 40 patients with a median age of 3.7 years. Fourteen patients (35%) pulled off the sensor before arrival to the OR and 26 patients (65%) arrived at the OR with the sensor intact and functioning. Older children were more likely to maintain the sensor until arrival to the OR compared to younger patients (median age of 5.24 versus 1 year, P = 0.0521). A median age of 3.7 years correlated with an 80% chance of arriving in the OR with the sensor intact. Application ease and tolerance of the sensor were higher in the group that maintained the sensor until OR arrival.

Conclusion: In patients more than 4 years of age, placement of the self-adhesive sensor for EMG-based TOF monitoring may be feasible. However, in younger patients, additional interventions may be required to achieve a similar success rate.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
141
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊最新文献
The trapezius plane block: Extended use in perioperative pain management in nerve transfer surgeries. Intermittent apnoea and manual jet ventilation: A successful anesthetic management for infant with acquired Myer-Cotton class III subglottic stenosis undergoing endoscopic balloon dilatation Challenges in the anesthetic management of a pediatric patient with glottic web – A lesson Effect of bispectral index on intra-operative awareness: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies Incidence of post-dural lumbar puncture headache (PDLPH) in comparison between emergency and elective lower segment cesarean section (LSCS) with 26G Quincke–Babcock cutting-beveled spinal needle
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1