重新评估对战斗机飞行员进行常规最大有氧能力测试的必要性。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 BIOPHYSICS Aerospace medicine and human performance Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.3357/AMHP.6409.2024
Zachary Zeigler, Anthony M Acevedo
{"title":"重新评估对战斗机飞行员进行常规最大有氧能力测试的必要性。","authors":"Zachary Zeigler, Anthony M Acevedo","doi":"10.3357/AMHP.6409.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>INTRODUCTION:</b> There is a current belief in aviation suggesting that aerobic training may reduce G-tolerance due to potential negative impacts on arterial pressure response. Studies indicate that increasing maximal aerobic capacity (<mml:math id=\"ie1\" display=\"inline\"><mml:mrow><mml:mover><mml:mtext>V</mml:mtext><mml:mo>˙</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow></mml:math>o₂ max) through aerobic training does not hinder G-tolerance. Moreover, sustained centrifuge training programs revealed no instances where excessive aerobic exercise compromised a trainee's ability to complete target profiles. The purpose of this review article is to examine the current research in the hope of establishing the need for routine <mml:math id=\"ie2\" display=\"inline\"><mml:mrow><mml:mover><mml:mtext>V</mml:mtext><mml:mo>˙</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow></mml:math>o₂-max testing in air force pilot protocols.<b>METHODS:</b> A systematic search of electronic databases including Google Scholar, PubMed, the Aerospace Medical Association, and Military Medicine was conducted. Keywords related to \"human performance,\" \"Air Force fighter pilots,\" \"aerobic function,\" and \"maximal aerobic capacity\" were used in various combinations. Articles addressing exercise physiology, G-tolerance, physical training, and fighter pilot maneuvers related to human performance were considered. No primary data collection involving human subjects was conducted; therefore, ethical approval was not required.<b>RESULTS:</b> The <mml:math id=\"ie3\" display=\"inline\"><mml:mrow><mml:mover><mml:mtext>V</mml:mtext><mml:mo>˙</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow></mml:math>o₂-max test provides essential information regarding a pilot's ability to handle increased G<sub>z</sub>-load. It assists in predicting G-induced loss of consciousness by assessing anti-G straining maneuver performance and heart rate variables during increased G-load.<b>DISCUSSION:</b> <mml:math id=\"ie4\" display=\"inline\"><mml:mrow><mml:mover><mml:mtext>V</mml:mtext><mml:mo>˙</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow></mml:math>o₂-max testing guides tailored exercise plans, optimizes cardiovascular health, and disproves the notion that aerobic training hampers G-tolerance. Its inclusion in air force protocols could boost readiness, reduce health risks, and refine training for fighter pilots' safety and performance. This evidence-backed approach supports integrating <mml:math id=\"ie5\" display=\"inline\"><mml:mrow><mml:mover><mml:mtext>V</mml:mtext><mml:mo>˙</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow></mml:math>o₂-max testing for insights into fitness, risks, and tailored exercise.<b>Zeigler Z, Acevedo AM. <i>Re-evaluating the need for routine maximal aerobic capacity testing within fighter pilots</i>. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2024; 95(5):273-277.</b></p>","PeriodicalId":7463,"journal":{"name":"Aerospace medicine and human performance","volume":"95 5","pages":"273-277"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Re-evaluating the Need for Routine Maximal Aerobic Capacity Testing within Fighter Pilots.\",\"authors\":\"Zachary Zeigler, Anthony M Acevedo\",\"doi\":\"10.3357/AMHP.6409.2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>INTRODUCTION:</b> There is a current belief in aviation suggesting that aerobic training may reduce G-tolerance due to potential negative impacts on arterial pressure response. Studies indicate that increasing maximal aerobic capacity (<mml:math id=\\\"ie1\\\" display=\\\"inline\\\"><mml:mrow><mml:mover><mml:mtext>V</mml:mtext><mml:mo>˙</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow></mml:math>o₂ max) through aerobic training does not hinder G-tolerance. Moreover, sustained centrifuge training programs revealed no instances where excessive aerobic exercise compromised a trainee's ability to complete target profiles. The purpose of this review article is to examine the current research in the hope of establishing the need for routine <mml:math id=\\\"ie2\\\" display=\\\"inline\\\"><mml:mrow><mml:mover><mml:mtext>V</mml:mtext><mml:mo>˙</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow></mml:math>o₂-max testing in air force pilot protocols.<b>METHODS:</b> A systematic search of electronic databases including Google Scholar, PubMed, the Aerospace Medical Association, and Military Medicine was conducted. Keywords related to \\\"human performance,\\\" \\\"Air Force fighter pilots,\\\" \\\"aerobic function,\\\" and \\\"maximal aerobic capacity\\\" were used in various combinations. Articles addressing exercise physiology, G-tolerance, physical training, and fighter pilot maneuvers related to human performance were considered. No primary data collection involving human subjects was conducted; therefore, ethical approval was not required.<b>RESULTS:</b> The <mml:math id=\\\"ie3\\\" display=\\\"inline\\\"><mml:mrow><mml:mover><mml:mtext>V</mml:mtext><mml:mo>˙</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow></mml:math>o₂-max test provides essential information regarding a pilot's ability to handle increased G<sub>z</sub>-load. It assists in predicting G-induced loss of consciousness by assessing anti-G straining maneuver performance and heart rate variables during increased G-load.<b>DISCUSSION:</b> <mml:math id=\\\"ie4\\\" display=\\\"inline\\\"><mml:mrow><mml:mover><mml:mtext>V</mml:mtext><mml:mo>˙</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow></mml:math>o₂-max testing guides tailored exercise plans, optimizes cardiovascular health, and disproves the notion that aerobic training hampers G-tolerance. Its inclusion in air force protocols could boost readiness, reduce health risks, and refine training for fighter pilots' safety and performance. This evidence-backed approach supports integrating <mml:math id=\\\"ie5\\\" display=\\\"inline\\\"><mml:mrow><mml:mover><mml:mtext>V</mml:mtext><mml:mo>˙</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow></mml:math>o₂-max testing for insights into fitness, risks, and tailored exercise.<b>Zeigler Z, Acevedo AM. <i>Re-evaluating the need for routine maximal aerobic capacity testing within fighter pilots</i>. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2024; 95(5):273-277.</b></p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7463,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aerospace medicine and human performance\",\"volume\":\"95 5\",\"pages\":\"273-277\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aerospace medicine and human performance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3357/AMHP.6409.2024\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aerospace medicine and human performance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3357/AMHP.6409.2024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:目前在航空领域有一种观点认为,有氧训练可能会降低 G 耐力,因为它对动脉压力反应有潜在的负面影响。研究表明,通过有氧训练提高最大有氧能力(V˙o₂ max)并不会妨碍G耐受性。此外,持续的离心机训练计划也没有发现过度的有氧运动会影响受训者完成目标剖面的能力。这篇综述文章的目的是研究当前的研究,希望能确定在空军飞行员训练方案中进行常规 V˙o₂-最大值测试的必要性。方法:对电子数据库进行了系统搜索,包括谷歌学术、PubMed、航空航天医学协会和军事医学。使用了与 "人类表现"、"空军战斗机飞行员"、"有氧功能 "和 "最大有氧能力 "相关的不同组合关键词。考虑了涉及运动生理学、G耐受性、体能训练以及与人体表现相关的战斗机飞行员动作的文章。结果:V˙o₂-max 测试提供了飞行员应对 Gz 负荷增加能力的重要信息。讨论:V˙o₂-最大值测试可指导量身定制的运动计划,优化心血管健康,并推翻了有氧训练会影响 G 耐受力的观点。将其纳入空军规程可以提高战备状态,降低健康风险,并完善战斗机飞行员的安全和性能训练。这种有证据支持的方法支持整合 V˙₂-最大值测试,以深入了解体能、风险和量身定制的运动。重新评估战斗机飞行员进行常规最大有氧能力测试的必要性。Aerosp Med Hum Perform.2024; 95(5):273-277.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Re-evaluating the Need for Routine Maximal Aerobic Capacity Testing within Fighter Pilots.

INTRODUCTION: There is a current belief in aviation suggesting that aerobic training may reduce G-tolerance due to potential negative impacts on arterial pressure response. Studies indicate that increasing maximal aerobic capacity (V˙o₂ max) through aerobic training does not hinder G-tolerance. Moreover, sustained centrifuge training programs revealed no instances where excessive aerobic exercise compromised a trainee's ability to complete target profiles. The purpose of this review article is to examine the current research in the hope of establishing the need for routine V˙o₂-max testing in air force pilot protocols.METHODS: A systematic search of electronic databases including Google Scholar, PubMed, the Aerospace Medical Association, and Military Medicine was conducted. Keywords related to "human performance," "Air Force fighter pilots," "aerobic function," and "maximal aerobic capacity" were used in various combinations. Articles addressing exercise physiology, G-tolerance, physical training, and fighter pilot maneuvers related to human performance were considered. No primary data collection involving human subjects was conducted; therefore, ethical approval was not required.RESULTS: The V˙o₂-max test provides essential information regarding a pilot's ability to handle increased Gz-load. It assists in predicting G-induced loss of consciousness by assessing anti-G straining maneuver performance and heart rate variables during increased G-load.DISCUSSION: V˙o₂-max testing guides tailored exercise plans, optimizes cardiovascular health, and disproves the notion that aerobic training hampers G-tolerance. Its inclusion in air force protocols could boost readiness, reduce health risks, and refine training for fighter pilots' safety and performance. This evidence-backed approach supports integrating V˙o₂-max testing for insights into fitness, risks, and tailored exercise.Zeigler Z, Acevedo AM. Re-evaluating the need for routine maximal aerobic capacity testing within fighter pilots. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2024; 95(5):273-277.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Aerospace medicine and human performance
Aerospace medicine and human performance PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
22.20%
发文量
272
期刊介绍: The peer-reviewed monthly journal, Aerospace Medicine and Human Performance (AMHP), formerly Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, provides contact with physicians, life scientists, bioengineers, and medical specialists working in both basic medical research and in its clinical applications. It is the most used and cited journal in its field. It is distributed to more than 80 nations.
期刊最新文献
Aeromedical Considerations for Patient Safety in Aesthetic Medical Tourism. Book Review. Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging Responses to Nonhypoxic Hypobaric Decompression. Embolic Ischemic Cortical Stroke in a Young Flight Instructor with a Small Patent Foramen Ovale. Evolution of Space Medicine at NASA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1