Keeley O'Grady, Stacey Hong, Papanin Putsathit, Narelle George, Christine Hemphill, Peter G Huntington, Tony M Korman, Despina Kotsanas, Monica Lahra, Rodney McDougall, Andrew McGlinchey, Avram Levy, Casey V Moore, Graeme Nimmo, Louise Prendergast, Jennifer Robson, David J Speers, Lynette Waring, Michael C Wehrhahn, Gerhard F Weldhagen, Richard M Wilson, Thomas V Riley, Daniel R Knight
{"title":"确定澳大利亚流行的主要艰难梭菌核型的系统发育和抗药性基因组。","authors":"Keeley O'Grady, Stacey Hong, Papanin Putsathit, Narelle George, Christine Hemphill, Peter G Huntington, Tony M Korman, Despina Kotsanas, Monica Lahra, Rodney McDougall, Andrew McGlinchey, Avram Levy, Casey V Moore, Graeme Nimmo, Louise Prendergast, Jennifer Robson, David J Speers, Lynette Waring, Michael C Wehrhahn, Gerhard F Weldhagen, Richard M Wilson, Thomas V Riley, Daniel R Knight","doi":"10.1099/mgen.0.001232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Clostridioides difficile</i> infection (CDI) remains a significant public health threat globally. New interventions to treat CDI rely on an understanding of the evolution and epidemiology of circulating strains. Here we provide longitudinal genomic data on strain diversity, transmission dynamics and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) of <i>C. difficile</i> ribotypes (RTs) 014/020 (<i>n</i>=169), 002 (<i>n</i>=77) and 056 (<i>n</i>=36), the three most prominent <i>C. difficile</i> strains causing CDI in Australia. Genome scrutiny showed that AMR was uncommon in these lineages, with resistance-conferring alleles present in only 15/169 RT014/020 strains (8.9 %), 1/36 RT056 strains (2.78 %) and none of 77 RT002 strains. Notably, ~90 % of strains were resistant to MLS<sub>B</sub> agents <i>in vitro</i>, but only ~5.9 % harboured known resistance alleles, highlighting an incongruence between AMR genotype and phenotype. Core genome analyses revealed all three RTs contained genetically heterogeneous strain populations with limited evidence of clonal transmission between CDI cases. The average number of pairwise core genome SNP (cgSNP) differences within each RT group ranged from 23.3 (RT056, ST34, <i>n</i>=36) to 115.6 (RT002, ST8, <i>n</i>=77) and 315.9 (RT014/020, STs 2, 13, 14, 49, <i>n</i>=169). Just 19 clonal groups (encompassing 40 isolates), defined as isolates differing by ≤2 cgSNPs, were identified across all three RTs (RT014/020, <i>n</i>=14; RT002, <i>n</i>=3; RT056, <i>n</i>=2). Of these clonal groups, 63 % (12/19) comprised isolates from the same Australian State and 37 % (7/19) comprised isolates from different States. The low number of plausible transmission events found for these major RTs (and previously documented populations in animal and environmental sources/reservoirs) points to widespread and persistent community sources of diverse <i>C. difficile</i> strains as opposed to ongoing nationwide healthcare outbreaks dominated by a single clone. Together, these data provide new insights into the evolution of major lineages causing CDI in Australia and highlight the urgent need for enhanced surveillance, and for public health interventions to move beyond the healthcare setting and into a One Health paradigm to effectively combat this complex pathogen.</p>","PeriodicalId":18487,"journal":{"name":"Microbial Genomics","volume":"10 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11165652/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Defining the phylogenetics and resistome of the major <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> ribotypes circulating in Australia.\",\"authors\":\"Keeley O'Grady, Stacey Hong, Papanin Putsathit, Narelle George, Christine Hemphill, Peter G Huntington, Tony M Korman, Despina Kotsanas, Monica Lahra, Rodney McDougall, Andrew McGlinchey, Avram Levy, Casey V Moore, Graeme Nimmo, Louise Prendergast, Jennifer Robson, David J Speers, Lynette Waring, Michael C Wehrhahn, Gerhard F Weldhagen, Richard M Wilson, Thomas V Riley, Daniel R Knight\",\"doi\":\"10.1099/mgen.0.001232\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Clostridioides difficile</i> infection (CDI) remains a significant public health threat globally. New interventions to treat CDI rely on an understanding of the evolution and epidemiology of circulating strains. Here we provide longitudinal genomic data on strain diversity, transmission dynamics and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) of <i>C. difficile</i> ribotypes (RTs) 014/020 (<i>n</i>=169), 002 (<i>n</i>=77) and 056 (<i>n</i>=36), the three most prominent <i>C. difficile</i> strains causing CDI in Australia. Genome scrutiny showed that AMR was uncommon in these lineages, with resistance-conferring alleles present in only 15/169 RT014/020 strains (8.9 %), 1/36 RT056 strains (2.78 %) and none of 77 RT002 strains. Notably, ~90 % of strains were resistant to MLS<sub>B</sub> agents <i>in vitro</i>, but only ~5.9 % harboured known resistance alleles, highlighting an incongruence between AMR genotype and phenotype. Core genome analyses revealed all three RTs contained genetically heterogeneous strain populations with limited evidence of clonal transmission between CDI cases. The average number of pairwise core genome SNP (cgSNP) differences within each RT group ranged from 23.3 (RT056, ST34, <i>n</i>=36) to 115.6 (RT002, ST8, <i>n</i>=77) and 315.9 (RT014/020, STs 2, 13, 14, 49, <i>n</i>=169). Just 19 clonal groups (encompassing 40 isolates), defined as isolates differing by ≤2 cgSNPs, were identified across all three RTs (RT014/020, <i>n</i>=14; RT002, <i>n</i>=3; RT056, <i>n</i>=2). Of these clonal groups, 63 % (12/19) comprised isolates from the same Australian State and 37 % (7/19) comprised isolates from different States. The low number of plausible transmission events found for these major RTs (and previously documented populations in animal and environmental sources/reservoirs) points to widespread and persistent community sources of diverse <i>C. difficile</i> strains as opposed to ongoing nationwide healthcare outbreaks dominated by a single clone. Together, these data provide new insights into the evolution of major lineages causing CDI in Australia and highlight the urgent need for enhanced surveillance, and for public health interventions to move beyond the healthcare setting and into a One Health paradigm to effectively combat this complex pathogen.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18487,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Microbial Genomics\",\"volume\":\"10 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11165652/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Microbial Genomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1099/mgen.0.001232\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbial Genomics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1099/mgen.0.001232","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Defining the phylogenetics and resistome of the major Clostridioides difficile ribotypes circulating in Australia.
Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) remains a significant public health threat globally. New interventions to treat CDI rely on an understanding of the evolution and epidemiology of circulating strains. Here we provide longitudinal genomic data on strain diversity, transmission dynamics and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) of C. difficile ribotypes (RTs) 014/020 (n=169), 002 (n=77) and 056 (n=36), the three most prominent C. difficile strains causing CDI in Australia. Genome scrutiny showed that AMR was uncommon in these lineages, with resistance-conferring alleles present in only 15/169 RT014/020 strains (8.9 %), 1/36 RT056 strains (2.78 %) and none of 77 RT002 strains. Notably, ~90 % of strains were resistant to MLSB agents in vitro, but only ~5.9 % harboured known resistance alleles, highlighting an incongruence between AMR genotype and phenotype. Core genome analyses revealed all three RTs contained genetically heterogeneous strain populations with limited evidence of clonal transmission between CDI cases. The average number of pairwise core genome SNP (cgSNP) differences within each RT group ranged from 23.3 (RT056, ST34, n=36) to 115.6 (RT002, ST8, n=77) and 315.9 (RT014/020, STs 2, 13, 14, 49, n=169). Just 19 clonal groups (encompassing 40 isolates), defined as isolates differing by ≤2 cgSNPs, were identified across all three RTs (RT014/020, n=14; RT002, n=3; RT056, n=2). Of these clonal groups, 63 % (12/19) comprised isolates from the same Australian State and 37 % (7/19) comprised isolates from different States. The low number of plausible transmission events found for these major RTs (and previously documented populations in animal and environmental sources/reservoirs) points to widespread and persistent community sources of diverse C. difficile strains as opposed to ongoing nationwide healthcare outbreaks dominated by a single clone. Together, these data provide new insights into the evolution of major lineages causing CDI in Australia and highlight the urgent need for enhanced surveillance, and for public health interventions to move beyond the healthcare setting and into a One Health paradigm to effectively combat this complex pathogen.
期刊介绍:
Microbial Genomics (MGen) is a fully open access, mandatory open data and peer-reviewed journal publishing high-profile original research on archaea, bacteria, microbial eukaryotes and viruses.