透析终末期肾病患者头颈部的显微外科重建。

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Microsurgery Pub Date : 2024-05-08 DOI:10.1002/micr.31186
Chen-Ting Hung MD, Meng-Si Wu MD, Chien-Hsing Wang MD, Li-Fu Cheng MD, Yu-Fu Chou MD, Chia-Fone Lee MD, Peir-Rong Chen MD, Jiunn-Tat Lee MD
{"title":"透析终末期肾病患者头颈部的显微外科重建。","authors":"Chen-Ting Hung MD,&nbsp;Meng-Si Wu MD,&nbsp;Chien-Hsing Wang MD,&nbsp;Li-Fu Cheng MD,&nbsp;Yu-Fu Chou MD,&nbsp;Chia-Fone Lee MD,&nbsp;Peir-Rong Chen MD,&nbsp;Jiunn-Tat Lee MD","doi":"10.1002/micr.31186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Free flap transfer for head and neck defects has gained worldwide acceptance. Because flap failure is a devastating outcome, studies have attempted to identify risk factors—including renal failure. We sought to determine whether end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients undergoing dialysis are at increased risk of flap failure following microsurgical head and neck reconstruction.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patients and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The study's participants were patients who underwent free flap reconstruction in the head and neck region at Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital between January 2010 and December 2019. We used the National Health Insurance “Specific Diagnosis and Treatment Code” to identify patients undergoing dialysis; these patients comprised the dialysis group, whose members were matched to a non-dialysis group for age and gender. The dependent variables were flap survival rate, take-back rate, and flap failure risk between the dialysis and non-dialysis groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We included 154 patients in the dialysis (<i>n</i> = 14) and non-dialysis (<i>n</i> = 140) groups. The groups were similar in terms of age and most comorbidities, except diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and coronary artery disease, which were more prevalent in the dialysis group. The dialysis and non-dialysis groups had similar flap survival rates (100% vs. 92.9%; <i>p</i> = .600). Twenty-three patients underwent take-back surgery, most in the non-dialysis group (14.3% vs. 15.0%; <i>p</i> = 1.000). Patients in the dialysis group were more likely to have prolonged intensive care unit stays; however, dialysis alone did not predict flap failure (OR: 0.83; <i>p</i> = .864).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This study found no significant differences in free flap survival and take-back rates between patients with and without dialysis. Dialysis did not increase the risk of flap failure following microsurgical head and neck reconstruction in this study; however, prospective, randomized controlled trials are needed.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18600,"journal":{"name":"Microsurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Microsurgical reconstruction for head and neck in patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing dialysis\",\"authors\":\"Chen-Ting Hung MD,&nbsp;Meng-Si Wu MD,&nbsp;Chien-Hsing Wang MD,&nbsp;Li-Fu Cheng MD,&nbsp;Yu-Fu Chou MD,&nbsp;Chia-Fone Lee MD,&nbsp;Peir-Rong Chen MD,&nbsp;Jiunn-Tat Lee MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/micr.31186\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Free flap transfer for head and neck defects has gained worldwide acceptance. Because flap failure is a devastating outcome, studies have attempted to identify risk factors—including renal failure. We sought to determine whether end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients undergoing dialysis are at increased risk of flap failure following microsurgical head and neck reconstruction.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Patients and Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>The study's participants were patients who underwent free flap reconstruction in the head and neck region at Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital between January 2010 and December 2019. We used the National Health Insurance “Specific Diagnosis and Treatment Code” to identify patients undergoing dialysis; these patients comprised the dialysis group, whose members were matched to a non-dialysis group for age and gender. The dependent variables were flap survival rate, take-back rate, and flap failure risk between the dialysis and non-dialysis groups.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>We included 154 patients in the dialysis (<i>n</i> = 14) and non-dialysis (<i>n</i> = 140) groups. The groups were similar in terms of age and most comorbidities, except diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and coronary artery disease, which were more prevalent in the dialysis group. The dialysis and non-dialysis groups had similar flap survival rates (100% vs. 92.9%; <i>p</i> = .600). Twenty-three patients underwent take-back surgery, most in the non-dialysis group (14.3% vs. 15.0%; <i>p</i> = 1.000). Patients in the dialysis group were more likely to have prolonged intensive care unit stays; however, dialysis alone did not predict flap failure (OR: 0.83; <i>p</i> = .864).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study found no significant differences in free flap survival and take-back rates between patients with and without dialysis. Dialysis did not increase the risk of flap failure following microsurgical head and neck reconstruction in this study; however, prospective, randomized controlled trials are needed.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18600,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Microsurgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Microsurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/micr.31186\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/micr.31186","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介游离皮瓣转移治疗头颈部缺损已被全世界所接受。由于皮瓣失败是一种破坏性结果,因此研究人员试图找出包括肾功能衰竭在内的风险因素。我们试图确定接受透析的终末期肾病(ESRD)患者在头颈部显微外科重建术后皮瓣失败的风险是否会增加:研究对象为2010年1月至2019年12月期间在花莲慈济医院接受头颈部游离皮瓣重建术的患者。我们使用国民健康保险的 "特定诊断和治疗代码 "来识别接受透析的患者;这些患者组成透析组,其成员在年龄和性别上与非透析组相匹配。因变量为透析组和非透析组之间的皮瓣存活率、收回率和皮瓣失败风险:透析组(14 人)和非透析组(140 人)共有 154 名患者。除糖尿病、高血压和冠状动脉疾病在透析组较常见外,两组患者的年龄和大多数合并症相似。透析组和非透析组的皮瓣存活率相似(100% vs. 92.9%; p = .600)。23名患者接受了回取手术,其中大部分是非透析组患者(14.3% 对 15.0%;P = 1.000)。透析组患者更有可能延长重症监护室的住院时间;但透析本身并不能预测皮瓣失败(OR:0.83;P = .864):本研究发现,透析和非透析患者的游离皮瓣存活率和收回率没有明显差异。透析不会增加头颈部显微外科重建术后皮瓣失败的风险,但还需要进行前瞻性随机对照试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Microsurgical reconstruction for head and neck in patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing dialysis

Introduction

Free flap transfer for head and neck defects has gained worldwide acceptance. Because flap failure is a devastating outcome, studies have attempted to identify risk factors—including renal failure. We sought to determine whether end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients undergoing dialysis are at increased risk of flap failure following microsurgical head and neck reconstruction.

Patients and Methods

The study's participants were patients who underwent free flap reconstruction in the head and neck region at Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital between January 2010 and December 2019. We used the National Health Insurance “Specific Diagnosis and Treatment Code” to identify patients undergoing dialysis; these patients comprised the dialysis group, whose members were matched to a non-dialysis group for age and gender. The dependent variables were flap survival rate, take-back rate, and flap failure risk between the dialysis and non-dialysis groups.

Results

We included 154 patients in the dialysis (n = 14) and non-dialysis (n = 140) groups. The groups were similar in terms of age and most comorbidities, except diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and coronary artery disease, which were more prevalent in the dialysis group. The dialysis and non-dialysis groups had similar flap survival rates (100% vs. 92.9%; p = .600). Twenty-three patients underwent take-back surgery, most in the non-dialysis group (14.3% vs. 15.0%; p = 1.000). Patients in the dialysis group were more likely to have prolonged intensive care unit stays; however, dialysis alone did not predict flap failure (OR: 0.83; p = .864).

Conclusion

This study found no significant differences in free flap survival and take-back rates between patients with and without dialysis. Dialysis did not increase the risk of flap failure following microsurgical head and neck reconstruction in this study; however, prospective, randomized controlled trials are needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Microsurgery
Microsurgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
19.00%
发文量
128
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Microsurgery is an international and interdisciplinary publication of original contributions concerning surgery under microscopic magnification. Microsurgery publishes clinical studies, research papers, invited articles, relevant reviews, and other scholarly works from all related fields including orthopaedic surgery, otolaryngology, pediatric surgery, plastic surgery, urology, and vascular surgery.
期刊最新文献
Preoperative Vascular Imaging in Lower Extremity Free Flap Reconstruction: Comparison Between Imaging Modalities Flap-Based Lower Extremity Reconstruction in the Elderly—Is It Safe and Does Age Impact Ambulation? Free Vascularized Scapula tip Flap to L5—S1 Vertebral Defect After Chronic Infection Related to Interbody Fusion Cage: A Case Report Issue Information Facial Artery Perforator Flap for Perioral and Perinasal Oncologic Defect Reconstruction: Surgical Technique and Postoperative Outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1