股骨近端支撑力差患者的模块化非骨水泥股骨翻修柄悬臂失效;如何避免?

Rahul Mohan, Nithin Unnikrishnan, Ravindra Gudena
{"title":"股骨近端支撑力差患者的模块化非骨水泥股骨翻修柄悬臂失效;如何避免?","authors":"Rahul Mohan, Nithin Unnikrishnan, Ravindra Gudena","doi":"10.22038/ABJS.2023.75373.3485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Revision hip arthroplasty is a major surgical challenge and is even more difficult in cases with a deficient proximal femur. Modular uncemented cone body revision femoral stems were introduced as a solution. They have the advantage of optimising joint kinematics by allowing the variable degrees of version, offset and leg length. However, we noticed cantilever failure of such stems, particularly in patients with deficient proximal femoral support. Fatigue fracture of the revision femoral stems should raise questions about its use in patients with insufficient proximal femoral bone support.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We present a case series of five patients with the cantilever failure of Stryker restoration modular stem conical distal femur prosthesis. These cases were identified during a retrospective review of revision hip surgeries performed at our trust.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The stem failed after an average of 22.6 months post-revision surgery. Primarily, poor proximal femur bone support with a well-fixed distal stem and secondarily high BMI led to this catastrophic failure in the absence of trauma. All five cases were re-revised to Stanmore proximal femoral replacement and achieved good functional outcomes after an average follow-up of seven years.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Proximal femoral bone support should be restored to prevent early cantilever failure of distally fixed proximal modular revision femoral stems. Consider a proximal femoral replacement if we cannot ensure proximal bone support.</p>","PeriodicalId":46704,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery-ABJS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11070676/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cantilever Failure of Modular Uncemented Femoral Revision Stem in Patients with Poor Proximal Femoral Support; How to avoid it?\",\"authors\":\"Rahul Mohan, Nithin Unnikrishnan, Ravindra Gudena\",\"doi\":\"10.22038/ABJS.2023.75373.3485\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Revision hip arthroplasty is a major surgical challenge and is even more difficult in cases with a deficient proximal femur. Modular uncemented cone body revision femoral stems were introduced as a solution. They have the advantage of optimising joint kinematics by allowing the variable degrees of version, offset and leg length. However, we noticed cantilever failure of such stems, particularly in patients with deficient proximal femoral support. Fatigue fracture of the revision femoral stems should raise questions about its use in patients with insufficient proximal femoral bone support.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We present a case series of five patients with the cantilever failure of Stryker restoration modular stem conical distal femur prosthesis. These cases were identified during a retrospective review of revision hip surgeries performed at our trust.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The stem failed after an average of 22.6 months post-revision surgery. Primarily, poor proximal femur bone support with a well-fixed distal stem and secondarily high BMI led to this catastrophic failure in the absence of trauma. All five cases were re-revised to Stanmore proximal femoral replacement and achieved good functional outcomes after an average follow-up of seven years.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Proximal femoral bone support should be restored to prevent early cantilever failure of distally fixed proximal modular revision femoral stems. Consider a proximal femoral replacement if we cannot ensure proximal bone support.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery-ABJS\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11070676/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery-ABJS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22038/ABJS.2023.75373.3485\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery-ABJS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/ABJS.2023.75373.3485","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:翻修髋关节置换术是一项重大手术挑战,对于股骨近端缺损的病例而言,难度更大。模块化非骨水泥锥体翻修股骨柄是一种解决方案。模块化非骨水泥锥体翻修股骨柄的优势在于,它允许不同程度的版本、偏移和腿长,从而优化了关节运动学。然而,我们注意到这种假体的悬臂失效,尤其是在股骨近端支撑不足的患者中。翻修股骨柄的疲劳断裂应引起人们对其在股骨近端骨支持不足的患者中使用的质疑:我们展示了五例史赛克翻修模块化柄锥形股骨远端假体悬臂失效患者的系列病例。这些病例是在我们医院进行的髋关节翻修手术的回顾性审查中发现的:结果:翻修手术后平均22.6个月后,股骨柄发生故障。主要原因是股骨近端骨支撑力差,远端柄固定良好,其次是高体重指数(BMI)导致了在无外伤情况下的灾难性失败。所有五例病例都重新接受了Stanmore股骨近端置换术,并在平均七年的随访后获得了良好的功能结果:结论:应恢复股骨近端骨支持,以防止远端固定的近端模块化翻修股骨柄出现早期悬臂失效。如果不能确保近端骨支持,应考虑股骨近端置换。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cantilever Failure of Modular Uncemented Femoral Revision Stem in Patients with Poor Proximal Femoral Support; How to avoid it?

Objectives: Revision hip arthroplasty is a major surgical challenge and is even more difficult in cases with a deficient proximal femur. Modular uncemented cone body revision femoral stems were introduced as a solution. They have the advantage of optimising joint kinematics by allowing the variable degrees of version, offset and leg length. However, we noticed cantilever failure of such stems, particularly in patients with deficient proximal femoral support. Fatigue fracture of the revision femoral stems should raise questions about its use in patients with insufficient proximal femoral bone support.

Methods: We present a case series of five patients with the cantilever failure of Stryker restoration modular stem conical distal femur prosthesis. These cases were identified during a retrospective review of revision hip surgeries performed at our trust.

Results: The stem failed after an average of 22.6 months post-revision surgery. Primarily, poor proximal femur bone support with a well-fixed distal stem and secondarily high BMI led to this catastrophic failure in the absence of trauma. All five cases were re-revised to Stanmore proximal femoral replacement and achieved good functional outcomes after an average follow-up of seven years.

Conclusion: Proximal femoral bone support should be restored to prevent early cantilever failure of distally fixed proximal modular revision femoral stems. Consider a proximal femoral replacement if we cannot ensure proximal bone support.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
128
期刊介绍: The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery (ABJS) aims to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of Orthopedic Sciences. The journal accepts scientific papers including original research, review article, short communication, case report, and letter to the editor in all fields of bone, joint, musculoskeletal surgery and related researches. The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery (ABJS) will publish papers in all aspects of today`s modern orthopedic sciences including: Arthroscopy, Arthroplasty, Sport Medicine, Reconstruction, Hand and Upper Extremity, Pediatric Orthopedics, Spine, Trauma, Foot and Ankle, Tumor, Joint Rheumatic Disease, Skeletal Imaging, Orthopedic Physical Therapy, Rehabilitation, Orthopedic Basic Sciences (Biomechanics, Biotechnology, Biomaterial..).
期刊最新文献
A Large Ankle Mass in a Figure Skater: A Case Report. Diagnostic Value of Radiographic Singh Index Compared to Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Scan in Diagnosing Osteoporosis: A Systematic Review. Double and Single Bundle in Athletes: A Comparison in Medium and Long-Term Rates to Return to Sport and Re-Injury. Investigating the Effect of Addition of Cervical Proprioceptive Training to Conventional Physiotherapy on Visual, Vestibular and Proprioceptive Dependency of Postural Control in Patients with Chronic Non-Specific Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Is Arthroscopic Latarjet a Cost-Effective Procedure? A Decision Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1