2011-2018 年 NHANES 中父母与非父母的心血管健康比较。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 FAMILY STUDIES Family & Community Health Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-07 DOI:10.1097/FCH.0000000000000403
Emily F Gregory, Adya I Maddox, Alyssa Tindall, Jose L Ibarra, Senbagam Virudachalam
{"title":"2011-2018 年 NHANES 中父母与非父母的心血管健康比较。","authors":"Emily F Gregory, Adya I Maddox, Alyssa Tindall, Jose L Ibarra, Senbagam Virudachalam","doi":"10.1097/FCH.0000000000000403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>We compared cardiovascular health for parents and non-parents using the American Heart Association's Life's Essential 8 (LE8).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional cohort analyzed 2011-2018 NHANES participants aged 20 to 54. The exposure was parenting, defined as living with a child. Logistic regression assessed whether parenting was associated with odds of ideal LE8 total or sub-scores. Regression adjusted for age, sex, race and ethnicity, educational attainment, marital status, and income. Subgroups included female sex, male sex, income <150% federal poverty levels, and parents of younger children.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>6847 participants represented a weighted population of 79 120 285 (57% parents). Parenting was not associated with adjusted odds of ideal total LE8 (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.76-1.09). Parenting was associated with decreased odds of ideal body mass index (BMI) (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.72-0.91) and increased odds of smoking avoidance (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.09-1.38). Associations varied by subgroup. Only the subgroup with lower incomes demonstrated reduced odds of ideal total LE8 for parents (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.41-0.82).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Parents and non-parents differed in smoking and BMI, though not in LE8 total. Families with low incomes may particularly benefit from dual generation cardiovascular risk reduction.</p>","PeriodicalId":47183,"journal":{"name":"Family & Community Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Cardiovascular Health Between Parents and Non-Parents in NHANES 2011-2018.\",\"authors\":\"Emily F Gregory, Adya I Maddox, Alyssa Tindall, Jose L Ibarra, Senbagam Virudachalam\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/FCH.0000000000000403\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>We compared cardiovascular health for parents and non-parents using the American Heart Association's Life's Essential 8 (LE8).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional cohort analyzed 2011-2018 NHANES participants aged 20 to 54. The exposure was parenting, defined as living with a child. Logistic regression assessed whether parenting was associated with odds of ideal LE8 total or sub-scores. Regression adjusted for age, sex, race and ethnicity, educational attainment, marital status, and income. Subgroups included female sex, male sex, income <150% federal poverty levels, and parents of younger children.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>6847 participants represented a weighted population of 79 120 285 (57% parents). Parenting was not associated with adjusted odds of ideal total LE8 (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.76-1.09). Parenting was associated with decreased odds of ideal body mass index (BMI) (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.72-0.91) and increased odds of smoking avoidance (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.09-1.38). Associations varied by subgroup. Only the subgroup with lower incomes demonstrated reduced odds of ideal total LE8 for parents (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.41-0.82).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Parents and non-parents differed in smoking and BMI, though not in LE8 total. Families with low incomes may particularly benefit from dual generation cardiovascular risk reduction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47183,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Family & Community Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Family & Community Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/FCH.0000000000000403\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family & Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/FCH.0000000000000403","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:我们使用美国心脏协会的生活必备 8 项指标(LE8)比较了父母和非父母的心血管健康状况:我们使用美国心脏协会的生活必备 8 项指标(LE8)比较了父母和非父母的心血管健康状况:该横断面队列分析了 2011-2018 年 20 至 54 岁的 NHANES 参与者。暴露是指养育子女,定义为与子女生活在一起。逻辑回归评估了养育子女是否与理想的 LE8 总分或子分数的几率有关。回归调整了年龄、性别、种族和民族、教育程度、婚姻状况和收入。分组包括女性性别、男性性别和收入:6847 名参与者代表了 79 120 285 名加权人口(57% 为父母)。养育子女与理想总 LE8 的调整几率无关(OR 0.91,95% CI 0.76-1.09)。养育子女与理想体重指数(BMI)降低的几率(OR 0.81,95% CI 0.72-0.91)和避免吸烟几率增加的几率(OR 1.22,95% CI 1.09-1.38)有关。不同亚组的相关性各不相同。只有收入较低的亚组显示出父母理想总 LE8 的几率降低(OR 0.58,95% CI 0.41-0.82):父母和非父母在吸烟和体重指数方面存在差异,但在LE8总量方面没有差异。低收入家庭可能特别受益于双代心血管风险降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of Cardiovascular Health Between Parents and Non-Parents in NHANES 2011-2018.

Background and objectives: We compared cardiovascular health for parents and non-parents using the American Heart Association's Life's Essential 8 (LE8).

Methods: This cross-sectional cohort analyzed 2011-2018 NHANES participants aged 20 to 54. The exposure was parenting, defined as living with a child. Logistic regression assessed whether parenting was associated with odds of ideal LE8 total or sub-scores. Regression adjusted for age, sex, race and ethnicity, educational attainment, marital status, and income. Subgroups included female sex, male sex, income <150% federal poverty levels, and parents of younger children.

Results: 6847 participants represented a weighted population of 79 120 285 (57% parents). Parenting was not associated with adjusted odds of ideal total LE8 (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.76-1.09). Parenting was associated with decreased odds of ideal body mass index (BMI) (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.72-0.91) and increased odds of smoking avoidance (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.09-1.38). Associations varied by subgroup. Only the subgroup with lower incomes demonstrated reduced odds of ideal total LE8 for parents (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.41-0.82).

Conclusions: Parents and non-parents differed in smoking and BMI, though not in LE8 total. Families with low incomes may particularly benefit from dual generation cardiovascular risk reduction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
4.30%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: Family & Community Health is a practical quarterly which presents creative, multidisciplinary perspectives and approaches for effective public and community health programs. Each issue focuses on a single timely topic and addresses issues of concern to a wide variety of population groups with diverse ethnic backgrounds, including children and the elderly, men and women, and rural and urban communities.
期刊最新文献
"Breaking Bread" With Respondents: Strategies to Increase Response Rates and Create Long-Term Cooperation With Health Clinic Administrators. Nepali Translation, Validity and Reliability Study of the Cohen-Hoberman Inventory of Physical Symptoms for Utilization With Bhutanese Refugees. A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Factors Promoting Intergenerational Resilience in Adolescent Youth With Refugee Status. Health Needs Assessment of Unhoused Youth in Charleston, South Carolina. Music Across Generations: Exploring Intergenerational First Nations Musical Practices as Cultural Determinants of Health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1