多发性骨髓瘤患者使用泊马度胺加地塞米松的真实体验:单中心回顾性研究

Betül Kübra TÜZÜN , Zühal DEMİRCİ , Gülçin ÇELEBİ , Ajda GÜNEŞ , Derya DEMİR , Nur SOYER , Filiz VURAL , Mahmut TÖBÜ , Fahri ŞAHİN , Güray SAYDAM
{"title":"多发性骨髓瘤患者使用泊马度胺加地塞米松的真实体验:单中心回顾性研究","authors":"Betül Kübra TÜZÜN ,&nbsp;Zühal DEMİRCİ ,&nbsp;Gülçin ÇELEBİ ,&nbsp;Ajda GÜNEŞ ,&nbsp;Derya DEMİR ,&nbsp;Nur SOYER ,&nbsp;Filiz VURAL ,&nbsp;Mahmut TÖBÜ ,&nbsp;Fahri ŞAHİN ,&nbsp;Güray SAYDAM","doi":"10.1016/j.htct.2024.04.033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Multiple myeloma (MM) is a heterogeneous disease with the uncontrolled clonal proliferation of plasma cells, accounting for approximately 10% of all hematologic cancers . Hence without curative therapy, the treatment aims to improve overall survival.Pomalidomide (POM) is a third-generation immunomodulatory agentPomalidomide can be administered with dexamethasone or in combination with proteasome inhibitors (bortezomib) and monoclonal antibodies (isatuximab, daratumumab). We retrospectively analysed all patients treated with pomalidomide at our centre between 2017 and 2023.</p></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><p>All patients who had received or were currently receiving treatment with pomalidomide at Ege University Hematology Outpatient Clinic between January 2017 and April 2023 were included. To be included in response assessments, patients had to have measurable disease as defined by International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) guidelines (Kumar et al, 2016) and have completed at least one cycle of pomalidomide with repeat biomarkers performed. Treatment consisted of 28-day cycles of pomalidomide (taken daily on days 1–21) plus dexamethasone (on days 1, 8, 15 and 22), plus or minus a third agent.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 25 patients who received treatment with pomalidomide were identified. Of these, 24 were able to be included in response analyses. Of the remaining 1 patient for whom response could not be assessed,had an anaphylactoid reaction with pomalidomide and did not complete a single cycle of treatment.</p><p>The analysis includes a total of 23 patients with RRMM, 1 patient with newly diagnosed multipl myeloma who had central nervous system involvement at diagnosis. 23 patients treated with POM-DEX in the lines of therapy subsequent to the second (third to seventh) line. Median patient age at diagnosis was 55 years (range 42–82), 7 (28%) patients were 65 or older than 65 years old. 13 patients were male (54,25%) and 11 were female (45,85%). 6 (25%) patients had International Staging System (ISS) stage I, 5 (20,8%) had stage II, 11 (45,8%) stage III myeloma, respectively (2 patients had not adjusted) stage III myeloma. 79,2 % (n=19)of patients had IgG, 4,2% (n=1) had IgD, 79,2 % (n=19) had kappa and 20,8 % (n=5) had lambda subtype myeloma. Six patients (25 %) had extramedullary disease and 18 (75 %)had lytic bone lesions at diagnosis.</p><p>Moreover, 12 (%50)patients had received a previous autologous stem cell transplant (single or double). 1 patient had autologous stem cell transplant after pomalidomide therapy. On data cut off (1 August 2023), median survival from initial diagnosis was not reached .Nearly all patients had received at least two previous lines of therapyand, as per guideline, had been exposed both to lenalidomide and bortezomib. Efficacy In a total of 24 patients, the treatment response rate (ORR), including all patients with a partial response or better, was 41.7%. A total of 10 patients gained a partial response (3) or a complete response (7). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 18,95±5,18 months. Median (IQR) treatment duration was 8 (2-47)months. 2 years OS had adjusted as % 35,4 ±12,8.</p><p>The most common adverse events were hematologic toxic effects, such as neutropenia (11 patients), anemia (3), thrombocytopenia (1); we also described gastrointestinal symptoms such as diarrhea, infections or sepsis, pneumonia.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Multiple myeloma (MM) is a heterogeneous disease with the uncontrolled clonal proliferation of plasma cells, accounting for approximately 10% of all hematologic cancers. Prognosis of patients after a second relapse remains poor, and the treatment is still challenging. According to the phase three study MM-003, pomalidomide in combination with dexamethasone (DEX) was approved as a subsequent line of therapy to the second one by the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in 2013, respectively, showing efficacy in patients with RRMM and previously exposed to both bortezomib and lenalidomide . In this study, we analyzed the efficacy of oral pomalidomide plus dexamethasone regimen in our patients that received more than one cycle of POM-DEX therapy. Although our patients received POM-DEX at an advanced stage of disease the findings from our real-life experience indicate that Poma-D is a safe and well-tolerated regimen with acceptable toxicity. The ORR reported in our study was 41.7% and is better than previous studies (33% in MM-002, 31% in Nimbus, and 32.6% in Stratus). The PFS observed in our cases of 18,95 ±5,18 months is also quite favorably comparable with that of previously mentioned trials (which described median results of 4.0–4.6 months). Nowadays triplet regimens are widely considered the standard of care in myeloma. Though the efficacy of POM-DEX, should not be underestimated for all those patients in which three-drug regimens are not indicated (because they are frail or very elderly, or with significant adverse effects related to proteasome inhibitors).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12958,"journal":{"name":"Hematology, Transfusion and Cell Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2531137924001159/pdfft?md5=5e0576fd10f00d9e4b5fb24d3192518b&pid=1-s2.0-S2531137924001159-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-Life Experience with Pomalidomide plus Dexamethasone in Patients with Multiple Myeloma: A Single Center Retrospective Study\",\"authors\":\"Betül Kübra TÜZÜN ,&nbsp;Zühal DEMİRCİ ,&nbsp;Gülçin ÇELEBİ ,&nbsp;Ajda GÜNEŞ ,&nbsp;Derya DEMİR ,&nbsp;Nur SOYER ,&nbsp;Filiz VURAL ,&nbsp;Mahmut TÖBÜ ,&nbsp;Fahri ŞAHİN ,&nbsp;Güray SAYDAM\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.htct.2024.04.033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Multiple myeloma (MM) is a heterogeneous disease with the uncontrolled clonal proliferation of plasma cells, accounting for approximately 10% of all hematologic cancers . Hence without curative therapy, the treatment aims to improve overall survival.Pomalidomide (POM) is a third-generation immunomodulatory agentPomalidomide can be administered with dexamethasone or in combination with proteasome inhibitors (bortezomib) and monoclonal antibodies (isatuximab, daratumumab). We retrospectively analysed all patients treated with pomalidomide at our centre between 2017 and 2023.</p></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><p>All patients who had received or were currently receiving treatment with pomalidomide at Ege University Hematology Outpatient Clinic between January 2017 and April 2023 were included. To be included in response assessments, patients had to have measurable disease as defined by International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) guidelines (Kumar et al, 2016) and have completed at least one cycle of pomalidomide with repeat biomarkers performed. Treatment consisted of 28-day cycles of pomalidomide (taken daily on days 1–21) plus dexamethasone (on days 1, 8, 15 and 22), plus or minus a third agent.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 25 patients who received treatment with pomalidomide were identified. Of these, 24 were able to be included in response analyses. Of the remaining 1 patient for whom response could not be assessed,had an anaphylactoid reaction with pomalidomide and did not complete a single cycle of treatment.</p><p>The analysis includes a total of 23 patients with RRMM, 1 patient with newly diagnosed multipl myeloma who had central nervous system involvement at diagnosis. 23 patients treated with POM-DEX in the lines of therapy subsequent to the second (third to seventh) line. Median patient age at diagnosis was 55 years (range 42–82), 7 (28%) patients were 65 or older than 65 years old. 13 patients were male (54,25%) and 11 were female (45,85%). 6 (25%) patients had International Staging System (ISS) stage I, 5 (20,8%) had stage II, 11 (45,8%) stage III myeloma, respectively (2 patients had not adjusted) stage III myeloma. 79,2 % (n=19)of patients had IgG, 4,2% (n=1) had IgD, 79,2 % (n=19) had kappa and 20,8 % (n=5) had lambda subtype myeloma. Six patients (25 %) had extramedullary disease and 18 (75 %)had lytic bone lesions at diagnosis.</p><p>Moreover, 12 (%50)patients had received a previous autologous stem cell transplant (single or double). 1 patient had autologous stem cell transplant after pomalidomide therapy. On data cut off (1 August 2023), median survival from initial diagnosis was not reached .Nearly all patients had received at least two previous lines of therapyand, as per guideline, had been exposed both to lenalidomide and bortezomib. Efficacy In a total of 24 patients, the treatment response rate (ORR), including all patients with a partial response or better, was 41.7%. A total of 10 patients gained a partial response (3) or a complete response (7). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 18,95±5,18 months. Median (IQR) treatment duration was 8 (2-47)months. 2 years OS had adjusted as % 35,4 ±12,8.</p><p>The most common adverse events were hematologic toxic effects, such as neutropenia (11 patients), anemia (3), thrombocytopenia (1); we also described gastrointestinal symptoms such as diarrhea, infections or sepsis, pneumonia.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Multiple myeloma (MM) is a heterogeneous disease with the uncontrolled clonal proliferation of plasma cells, accounting for approximately 10% of all hematologic cancers. Prognosis of patients after a second relapse remains poor, and the treatment is still challenging. According to the phase three study MM-003, pomalidomide in combination with dexamethasone (DEX) was approved as a subsequent line of therapy to the second one by the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in 2013, respectively, showing efficacy in patients with RRMM and previously exposed to both bortezomib and lenalidomide . In this study, we analyzed the efficacy of oral pomalidomide plus dexamethasone regimen in our patients that received more than one cycle of POM-DEX therapy. Although our patients received POM-DEX at an advanced stage of disease the findings from our real-life experience indicate that Poma-D is a safe and well-tolerated regimen with acceptable toxicity. The ORR reported in our study was 41.7% and is better than previous studies (33% in MM-002, 31% in Nimbus, and 32.6% in Stratus). The PFS observed in our cases of 18,95 ±5,18 months is also quite favorably comparable with that of previously mentioned trials (which described median results of 4.0–4.6 months). Nowadays triplet regimens are widely considered the standard of care in myeloma. Though the efficacy of POM-DEX, should not be underestimated for all those patients in which three-drug regimens are not indicated (because they are frail or very elderly, or with significant adverse effects related to proteasome inhibitors).</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12958,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hematology, Transfusion and Cell Therapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2531137924001159/pdfft?md5=5e0576fd10f00d9e4b5fb24d3192518b&pid=1-s2.0-S2531137924001159-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hematology, Transfusion and Cell Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2531137924001159\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hematology, Transfusion and Cell Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2531137924001159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多发性骨髓瘤(MM)是一种浆细胞克隆性增殖失控的异质性疾病,约占所有血液肿瘤的10%。泊马度胺(Pomalidomide,POM)是一种第三代免疫调节剂,可与地塞米松或蛋白酶体抑制剂(硼替佐米)和单克隆抗体(异妥昔单抗、达拉曲单抗)联合使用。方法纳入2017年1月至2023年4月期间在埃格大学血液学门诊接受或正在接受泊马度胺治疗的所有患者。根据国际骨髓瘤工作组(IMWG)指南(Kumar et al, 2016)的定义,患者必须患有可测量的疾病,并已完成至少一个周期的泊马度胺治疗,且重复进行了生物标志物检测,方可纳入反应评估。治疗包括28天周期的泊马度胺(第1-21天每天服用)加地塞米松(第1、8、15和22天),再加或不加第三种药物。其中24名患者被纳入反应分析。其余1名患者因使用泊马度胺后出现过敏性反应,且未完成一个周期的治疗,因此无法对其反应进行评估。分析共包括23名RRMM患者,1名新确诊的多发性骨髓瘤患者,该患者在确诊时中枢神经系统受累。23名患者在二线(第三至第七线)治疗后接受了POM-DEX治疗。患者确诊时的中位年龄为55岁(42-82岁),7名患者(28%)为65岁或65岁以上。13名患者为男性(54.25%),11名患者为女性(45.85%)。6名患者(25%)为国际分期系统(ISS)I期,5名患者(20.8%)为II期,11名患者(45.8%)为III期骨髓瘤(2名患者未调整)。79.2%(n=19)的患者为 IgG 型骨髓瘤,4.2%(n=1)为 IgD 型骨髓瘤,79.2%(n=19)为 kappa 型骨髓瘤,20.8%(n=5)为 lambda 亚型骨髓瘤。6名患者(25%)患有髓外疾病,18名患者(75%)在诊断时有溶解性骨病变。此外,12名患者(50%)曾接受过自体干细胞移植(单次或两次)。1名患者在接受泊马度胺治疗后进行了自体干细胞移植。在数据截止日(2023 年 8 月 1 日),自初诊起的中位生存期尚未达到。几乎所有患者都曾接受过至少两线治疗,而且根据指南,他们都曾接受过来那度胺和硼替佐米治疗。疗效 总共有24名患者的治疗反应率(ORR)为41.7%,其中包括所有部分反应或更好的患者。共有 10 名患者获得了部分应答(3 例)或完全应答(7 例)。无进展生存期(PFS)中位数为(18.95±5.18)个月。治疗时间中位数(IQR)为8(2-47)个月。最常见的不良反应是血液学毒性反应,如中性粒细胞减少(11例患者)、贫血(3例)、血小板减少(1例);我们还描述了腹泻、感染或败血症、肺炎等胃肠道症状。结论多发性骨髓瘤(MM)是一种浆细胞克隆性增殖失控的异质性疾病,约占所有血液系统癌症的10%。二次复发后患者的预后仍然很差,治疗仍然具有挑战性。根据MM-003三期研究,泊马度胺联合地塞米松(DEX)于2013年分别被美国食品药品管理局和欧洲药品管理局(EMA)批准作为二线治疗的后续治疗方案,在既往接受过硼替佐米和来那度胺治疗的RRMM患者中显示出疗效。在本研究中,我们分析了口服泊马度胺加地塞米松方案在接受一个周期以上POM-DEX治疗的患者中的疗效。虽然我们的患者接受 POM-DEX 治疗时已是疾病的晚期,但我们的实际经验表明,Poma-D 是一种安全、耐受性良好且毒性可接受的治疗方案。我们研究报告的 ORR 为 41.7%,优于之前的研究(MM-002 为 33%,Nimbus 为 31%,Stratus 为 32.6%)。我们的病例观察到的 PFS 为 18.95 ±5.18 个月,与之前提到的试验(描述的中位结果为 4.0-4.6 个月)相比也相当不错。如今,三联疗法被广泛认为是骨髓瘤的标准治疗方法。虽然POM-DEX的疗效不应被低估,但对于那些不适合使用三联疗法的患者(因为他们身体虚弱或年事已高,或与蛋白酶体抑制剂相关的不良反应严重),POM-DEX的疗效也不容忽视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Real-Life Experience with Pomalidomide plus Dexamethasone in Patients with Multiple Myeloma: A Single Center Retrospective Study

Objective

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a heterogeneous disease with the uncontrolled clonal proliferation of plasma cells, accounting for approximately 10% of all hematologic cancers . Hence without curative therapy, the treatment aims to improve overall survival.Pomalidomide (POM) is a third-generation immunomodulatory agentPomalidomide can be administered with dexamethasone or in combination with proteasome inhibitors (bortezomib) and monoclonal antibodies (isatuximab, daratumumab). We retrospectively analysed all patients treated with pomalidomide at our centre between 2017 and 2023.

Methodology

All patients who had received or were currently receiving treatment with pomalidomide at Ege University Hematology Outpatient Clinic between January 2017 and April 2023 were included. To be included in response assessments, patients had to have measurable disease as defined by International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) guidelines (Kumar et al, 2016) and have completed at least one cycle of pomalidomide with repeat biomarkers performed. Treatment consisted of 28-day cycles of pomalidomide (taken daily on days 1–21) plus dexamethasone (on days 1, 8, 15 and 22), plus or minus a third agent.

Results

A total of 25 patients who received treatment with pomalidomide were identified. Of these, 24 were able to be included in response analyses. Of the remaining 1 patient for whom response could not be assessed,had an anaphylactoid reaction with pomalidomide and did not complete a single cycle of treatment.

The analysis includes a total of 23 patients with RRMM, 1 patient with newly diagnosed multipl myeloma who had central nervous system involvement at diagnosis. 23 patients treated with POM-DEX in the lines of therapy subsequent to the second (third to seventh) line. Median patient age at diagnosis was 55 years (range 42–82), 7 (28%) patients were 65 or older than 65 years old. 13 patients were male (54,25%) and 11 were female (45,85%). 6 (25%) patients had International Staging System (ISS) stage I, 5 (20,8%) had stage II, 11 (45,8%) stage III myeloma, respectively (2 patients had not adjusted) stage III myeloma. 79,2 % (n=19)of patients had IgG, 4,2% (n=1) had IgD, 79,2 % (n=19) had kappa and 20,8 % (n=5) had lambda subtype myeloma. Six patients (25 %) had extramedullary disease and 18 (75 %)had lytic bone lesions at diagnosis.

Moreover, 12 (%50)patients had received a previous autologous stem cell transplant (single or double). 1 patient had autologous stem cell transplant after pomalidomide therapy. On data cut off (1 August 2023), median survival from initial diagnosis was not reached .Nearly all patients had received at least two previous lines of therapyand, as per guideline, had been exposed both to lenalidomide and bortezomib. Efficacy In a total of 24 patients, the treatment response rate (ORR), including all patients with a partial response or better, was 41.7%. A total of 10 patients gained a partial response (3) or a complete response (7). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 18,95±5,18 months. Median (IQR) treatment duration was 8 (2-47)months. 2 years OS had adjusted as % 35,4 ±12,8.

The most common adverse events were hematologic toxic effects, such as neutropenia (11 patients), anemia (3), thrombocytopenia (1); we also described gastrointestinal symptoms such as diarrhea, infections or sepsis, pneumonia.

Conclusion

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a heterogeneous disease with the uncontrolled clonal proliferation of plasma cells, accounting for approximately 10% of all hematologic cancers. Prognosis of patients after a second relapse remains poor, and the treatment is still challenging. According to the phase three study MM-003, pomalidomide in combination with dexamethasone (DEX) was approved as a subsequent line of therapy to the second one by the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in 2013, respectively, showing efficacy in patients with RRMM and previously exposed to both bortezomib and lenalidomide . In this study, we analyzed the efficacy of oral pomalidomide plus dexamethasone regimen in our patients that received more than one cycle of POM-DEX therapy. Although our patients received POM-DEX at an advanced stage of disease the findings from our real-life experience indicate that Poma-D is a safe and well-tolerated regimen with acceptable toxicity. The ORR reported in our study was 41.7% and is better than previous studies (33% in MM-002, 31% in Nimbus, and 32.6% in Stratus). The PFS observed in our cases of 18,95 ±5,18 months is also quite favorably comparable with that of previously mentioned trials (which described median results of 4.0–4.6 months). Nowadays triplet regimens are widely considered the standard of care in myeloma. Though the efficacy of POM-DEX, should not be underestimated for all those patients in which three-drug regimens are not indicated (because they are frail or very elderly, or with significant adverse effects related to proteasome inhibitors).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
1419
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
The challenge of timely diagnosis and management of acute leukemias and associated infections in Latin America The Brazilian association of hematology, hemotherapy, and cell therapy (ABHH) and its absolute commitment to ethics and absence of conflicts of interest Diagnosis and management of acute promyelocytic leukemia: Brazilian consensus guidelines 2024 on behalf of the Brazilian Association of Hematology, Hemotherapy and Cellular Therapy A SUCCESSFUL CASE OF PRIMARY PLASMA CELL LEUKEMIA TREATED WITH DARATUMUMAB-BASED THERAPY FOLLOWED BY AUTOLOGOUS BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION CARCINOMA EX PLEOMORPHIC ADENOMA: DIAGNOSTIC CHALLENGE AND TREATMENT PROTOCOL
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1