利用计算机断层扫描得出的胸骨形态测量结果,评估性别估计模型在加纳人口中的可靠性和准确性

Moses Banyeh , Abdul-Rafik Abdulai , Ernest Kofi Annan , Emmanuel Kofi Mensah , Charles Nkansah , Jeffrey Adom Nathan , Margaret Birago Twum , Paul Aghana Achumboro
{"title":"利用计算机断层扫描得出的胸骨形态测量结果,评估性别估计模型在加纳人口中的可靠性和准确性","authors":"Moses Banyeh ,&nbsp;Abdul-Rafik Abdulai ,&nbsp;Ernest Kofi Annan ,&nbsp;Emmanuel Kofi Mensah ,&nbsp;Charles Nkansah ,&nbsp;Jeffrey Adom Nathan ,&nbsp;Margaret Birago Twum ,&nbsp;Paul Aghana Achumboro","doi":"10.1016/j.fsir.2024.100368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Sex estimation models are specific to populations and cannot be generalized due to genetic and environmental variabilities. This retrospective cross-sectional study, conducted between January and September 2023 at the Tamale Teaching Hospital, included 119 (50.9 %) females and 115 (49.1 %) males aged 23–82 years. Measurements, including manubrium length (M), manubrium width (MW), sternal body length (B), combined manubrium and sternal body lengths (CL), corpus sterni width at first sternebrae (CSW<sub>S1</sub>), and corpus sterni width at third sternebrae (CSW<sub>S3</sub>), were obtained from Computerized Tomographic (CT) images of the sternum using DICOM Viewer, accurate to 0.1 cm. Subsequently, sternal area (SA) and sternal index (SI) were calculated. Univariable and stepwise multivariable discriminant function analysis (DFA) and logistic regression (LR) models were developed using a training sample (70 %), and cross-validation was performed on a holdout sample (30 %). Results showed that the linear measurements, excluding M, and sternal area were higher in males than females (P&lt;0.001), while the sternal index was &lt;50 % in males but &gt;50 % in females (P&lt;0.001). Univariable sex estimation accuracies, in cross-validation, ranged from 43.7 % to 92.9 % in DFA and 50.0–92.9 % in LR. For multivariable models, the accuracy ranges were 92.9–94.3 % in DFA and 91.6–93.0 % in LR. The sternal body length was the most accurate at 90.1 % in DFA and 90.2 % in LR, with lower sex bias (male-female) in LR than in DFA (-0.1 vs. 8.7). The sternum proves valuable for sex estimation, with sternal body length as the most accurate linear measurement. However, multivariable models, particularly LR, demonstrate higher accuracy compared to DFA.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36331,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Science International: Reports","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100368"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665910724000173/pdfft?md5=6c33fa04acf69c9c3cc017175e50f676&pid=1-s2.0-S2665910724000173-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the reliability and accuracy of sex estimation models utilizing sternal morphometry derived from computed tomography in the Ghanaian population\",\"authors\":\"Moses Banyeh ,&nbsp;Abdul-Rafik Abdulai ,&nbsp;Ernest Kofi Annan ,&nbsp;Emmanuel Kofi Mensah ,&nbsp;Charles Nkansah ,&nbsp;Jeffrey Adom Nathan ,&nbsp;Margaret Birago Twum ,&nbsp;Paul Aghana Achumboro\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fsir.2024.100368\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Sex estimation models are specific to populations and cannot be generalized due to genetic and environmental variabilities. This retrospective cross-sectional study, conducted between January and September 2023 at the Tamale Teaching Hospital, included 119 (50.9 %) females and 115 (49.1 %) males aged 23–82 years. Measurements, including manubrium length (M), manubrium width (MW), sternal body length (B), combined manubrium and sternal body lengths (CL), corpus sterni width at first sternebrae (CSW<sub>S1</sub>), and corpus sterni width at third sternebrae (CSW<sub>S3</sub>), were obtained from Computerized Tomographic (CT) images of the sternum using DICOM Viewer, accurate to 0.1 cm. Subsequently, sternal area (SA) and sternal index (SI) were calculated. Univariable and stepwise multivariable discriminant function analysis (DFA) and logistic regression (LR) models were developed using a training sample (70 %), and cross-validation was performed on a holdout sample (30 %). Results showed that the linear measurements, excluding M, and sternal area were higher in males than females (P&lt;0.001), while the sternal index was &lt;50 % in males but &gt;50 % in females (P&lt;0.001). Univariable sex estimation accuracies, in cross-validation, ranged from 43.7 % to 92.9 % in DFA and 50.0–92.9 % in LR. For multivariable models, the accuracy ranges were 92.9–94.3 % in DFA and 91.6–93.0 % in LR. The sternal body length was the most accurate at 90.1 % in DFA and 90.2 % in LR, with lower sex bias (male-female) in LR than in DFA (-0.1 vs. 8.7). The sternum proves valuable for sex estimation, with sternal body length as the most accurate linear measurement. However, multivariable models, particularly LR, demonstrate higher accuracy compared to DFA.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36331,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forensic Science International: Reports\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100368\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665910724000173/pdfft?md5=6c33fa04acf69c9c3cc017175e50f676&pid=1-s2.0-S2665910724000173-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forensic Science International: Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665910724000173\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Science International: Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665910724000173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

性别估计模型是针对特定人群的,由于遗传和环境的变异性而无法推广。这项回顾性横断面研究于 2023 年 1 月至 9 月在塔马利教学医院进行,包括 119 名(50.9%)女性和 115 名(49.1%)男性,年龄在 23-82 岁之间。测量数据包括胸骨长度(M)、胸骨宽度(MW)、胸骨体长度(B)、胸骨和胸骨联合长度(CL)、第一节胸骨处胸骨宽度(CSWS1)和第三节胸骨处胸骨宽度(CSWS3),测量数据来自使用 DICOM Viewer 的胸骨计算机断层扫描(CT)图像,精确到 0.1 厘米。随后计算胸骨面积(SA)和胸骨指数(SI)。利用训练样本(70%)建立了单变量和逐步多变量判别函数分析(DFA)和逻辑回归(LR)模型,并对保留样本(30%)进行了交叉验证。结果显示,男性的线性测量值(不包括 M)和胸骨面积均高于女性(P<0.001),而胸骨指数男性为 50%,女性为 50%(P<0.001)。在交叉验证中,DFA 的单变量性别估计准确率为 43.7% 至 92.9%,LR 为 50.0% 至 92.9%。对于多变量模型,DFA 的准确率范围为 92.9%-94.3%,LR 为 91.6%-93.0%。胸骨体长的准确率最高,DFA 为 90.1%,LR 为 90.2%,LR 的性别偏差(男性-女性)低于 DFA(-0.1 vs. 8.7)。胸骨对性别估计很有价值,胸骨体长是最准确的线性测量值。然而,与 DFA 相比,多变量模型,尤其是 LR,显示出更高的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing the reliability and accuracy of sex estimation models utilizing sternal morphometry derived from computed tomography in the Ghanaian population

Sex estimation models are specific to populations and cannot be generalized due to genetic and environmental variabilities. This retrospective cross-sectional study, conducted between January and September 2023 at the Tamale Teaching Hospital, included 119 (50.9 %) females and 115 (49.1 %) males aged 23–82 years. Measurements, including manubrium length (M), manubrium width (MW), sternal body length (B), combined manubrium and sternal body lengths (CL), corpus sterni width at first sternebrae (CSWS1), and corpus sterni width at third sternebrae (CSWS3), were obtained from Computerized Tomographic (CT) images of the sternum using DICOM Viewer, accurate to 0.1 cm. Subsequently, sternal area (SA) and sternal index (SI) were calculated. Univariable and stepwise multivariable discriminant function analysis (DFA) and logistic regression (LR) models were developed using a training sample (70 %), and cross-validation was performed on a holdout sample (30 %). Results showed that the linear measurements, excluding M, and sternal area were higher in males than females (P<0.001), while the sternal index was <50 % in males but >50 % in females (P<0.001). Univariable sex estimation accuracies, in cross-validation, ranged from 43.7 % to 92.9 % in DFA and 50.0–92.9 % in LR. For multivariable models, the accuracy ranges were 92.9–94.3 % in DFA and 91.6–93.0 % in LR. The sternal body length was the most accurate at 90.1 % in DFA and 90.2 % in LR, with lower sex bias (male-female) in LR than in DFA (-0.1 vs. 8.7). The sternum proves valuable for sex estimation, with sternal body length as the most accurate linear measurement. However, multivariable models, particularly LR, demonstrate higher accuracy compared to DFA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Forensic Science International: Reports
Forensic Science International: Reports Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
57 days
期刊最新文献
Survey of bloodstain pattern analysts regarding pattern classifications on assorted fabrics Missing persons of post-conflict countries: Assessing dental identification through a questionnaire-based study in Syria Technical Report A light touch; Reviewing the relative effectiveness of light sources and physical/chemical techniques for fingermark retrieval in casework From death to the Virgin birth: Multi-analytical investigation of a suspected 16th century painting Medico-legal analysis of the correlation between head trauma and aneurysm rupture: A case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1