评估用于不同建筑设计领域拓扑优化的草蜢插件

IF 0.7 4区 工程技术 0 ARCHITECTURE Nexus Network Journal Pub Date : 2024-05-06 DOI:10.1007/s00004-024-00782-z
Mariam Selmi, Zeynep Yeşim İlerisoy
{"title":"评估用于不同建筑设计领域拓扑优化的草蜢插件","authors":"Mariam Selmi, Zeynep Yeşim İlerisoy","doi":"10.1007/s00004-024-00782-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Topology optimization is a structural optimization method that aims to distribute material within a defined design domain. With the advancement of technology, topology optimization has become more popular in fields such as architecture. However, with the variety of tools available, users may find it challenging to decide which tool best suits their needs. Although grasshopper is widespread in architectural design, grasshopper plugins for topology optimization are one of the tools that are under-researched. This research uses four domain variations to explore their efficiency to conduct a comparative study of the grasshopper plugins: Millipede, tOpos, and Ameba. The setup process, resulting geometry, computation time, and volume fractions were used as comparison parameters. Each plugin was superior in one of these parameters. tOpos was, however, the fastest plugin and, along with Ameba, achieved target volume fractions.</p>","PeriodicalId":54719,"journal":{"name":"Nexus Network Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Grasshopper Plugins for Topology Optimization in Varied Architectural Design Domains\",\"authors\":\"Mariam Selmi, Zeynep Yeşim İlerisoy\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00004-024-00782-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Topology optimization is a structural optimization method that aims to distribute material within a defined design domain. With the advancement of technology, topology optimization has become more popular in fields such as architecture. However, with the variety of tools available, users may find it challenging to decide which tool best suits their needs. Although grasshopper is widespread in architectural design, grasshopper plugins for topology optimization are one of the tools that are under-researched. This research uses four domain variations to explore their efficiency to conduct a comparative study of the grasshopper plugins: Millipede, tOpos, and Ameba. The setup process, resulting geometry, computation time, and volume fractions were used as comparison parameters. Each plugin was superior in one of these parameters. tOpos was, however, the fastest plugin and, along with Ameba, achieved target volume fractions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54719,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nexus Network Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nexus Network Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00004-024-00782-z\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nexus Network Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00004-024-00782-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

拓扑优化是一种结构优化方法,其目的是在确定的设计领域内分配材料。随着技术的进步,拓扑优化在建筑等领域越来越受欢迎。然而,由于工具种类繁多,用户在选择哪种工具最适合自己的需求时可能会遇到困难。虽然蚱蜢在建筑设计中应用广泛,但用于拓扑优化的蚱蜢插件却是研究不足的工具之一。本研究利用四个领域的变化来探索它们的效率,从而对蚱蜢插件进行比较研究:Millipede、tOpos 和 Ameba。设置过程、生成的几何图形、计算时间和体积分数被用作比较参数。然而,tOpos 是速度最快的插件,与 Ameba 一起实现了目标体积分数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment of Grasshopper Plugins for Topology Optimization in Varied Architectural Design Domains

Topology optimization is a structural optimization method that aims to distribute material within a defined design domain. With the advancement of technology, topology optimization has become more popular in fields such as architecture. However, with the variety of tools available, users may find it challenging to decide which tool best suits their needs. Although grasshopper is widespread in architectural design, grasshopper plugins for topology optimization are one of the tools that are under-researched. This research uses four domain variations to explore their efficiency to conduct a comparative study of the grasshopper plugins: Millipede, tOpos, and Ameba. The setup process, resulting geometry, computation time, and volume fractions were used as comparison parameters. Each plugin was superior in one of these parameters. tOpos was, however, the fastest plugin and, along with Ameba, achieved target volume fractions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nexus Network Journal
Nexus Network Journal HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
53
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Founded in 1999, the Nexus Network Journal (NNJ) is a peer-reviewed journal for researchers, professionals and students engaged in the study of the application of mathematical principles to architectural design. Its goal is to present the broadest possible consideration of all aspects of the relationships between architecture and mathematics, including landscape architecture and urban design.
期刊最新文献
Gothic Design Procedures in Three Early Hawksmoor Churches Computing Typology: Generative Design for Creating Housing Solutions from Type Analysis in Bogota Hat Monotiles: Driving Innovation in Aperiodic Pattern Generation and Application Monge Surfaces. Generation, Discretisation and Application in Architecture 3D Printing Plastic Molds for Repeatable Casting of Mortarless Topological Interlocking Assemblies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1