{"title":"拓扑模型理论","authors":"Paolo Lipparini","doi":"10.1007/s11225-024-10107-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>An algebraization of the notion of topology has been proposed more than 70 years ago in a classical paper by McKinsey and Tarski, leading to an area of research still active today, with connections to algebra, geometry, logic and many applications, in particular, to modal logics. In McKinsey and Tarski’s setting the model theoretical notion of homomorphism does not correspond to the notion of continuity. We notice that the two notions correspond if instead we consider a preorder relation <span>\\( \\sqsubseteq \\)</span> defined by <span>\\(a \\sqsubseteq b\\)</span> if <i>a</i> is contained in the topological closure of <i>b</i>, for <i>a</i>, <i>b</i> subsets of some topological space. A <i>specialization poset</i> is a partially ordered set endowed with a further coarser preorder relation <span>\\( \\sqsubseteq \\)</span>. We show that every specialization poset can be embedded in the specialization poset naturally associated to some topological space, where the order relation corresponds to set-theoretical inclusion. Specialization semilattices are defined in an analogous way and the corresponding embedding theorem is proved. Specialization semilattices have the amalgamation property. Some basic topological facts and notions are recovered in this apparently very weak setting. The interest of these structures arises from the fact that they also occur in many rather disparate contexts, even far removed from topology.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Model Theory of Topology\",\"authors\":\"Paolo Lipparini\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11225-024-10107-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>An algebraization of the notion of topology has been proposed more than 70 years ago in a classical paper by McKinsey and Tarski, leading to an area of research still active today, with connections to algebra, geometry, logic and many applications, in particular, to modal logics. In McKinsey and Tarski’s setting the model theoretical notion of homomorphism does not correspond to the notion of continuity. We notice that the two notions correspond if instead we consider a preorder relation <span>\\\\( \\\\sqsubseteq \\\\)</span> defined by <span>\\\\(a \\\\sqsubseteq b\\\\)</span> if <i>a</i> is contained in the topological closure of <i>b</i>, for <i>a</i>, <i>b</i> subsets of some topological space. A <i>specialization poset</i> is a partially ordered set endowed with a further coarser preorder relation <span>\\\\( \\\\sqsubseteq \\\\)</span>. We show that every specialization poset can be embedded in the specialization poset naturally associated to some topological space, where the order relation corresponds to set-theoretical inclusion. Specialization semilattices are defined in an analogous way and the corresponding embedding theorem is proved. Specialization semilattices have the amalgamation property. Some basic topological facts and notions are recovered in this apparently very weak setting. The interest of these structures arises from the fact that they also occur in many rather disparate contexts, even far removed from topology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-024-10107-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-024-10107-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
70 多年前,麦肯锡和塔尔斯基在一篇经典论文中提出了拓扑学概念的代数化,从而开创了一个至今仍然活跃的研究领域,它与代数、几何、逻辑以及许多应用特别是模态逻辑都有联系。在麦肯锡和塔尔斯基的设定中,同态的模型理论概念与连续性概念并不对应。我们注意到,如果我们考虑一个前序关系 \( \sqsubseteq \),其定义是:对于某个拓扑空间的子集 a, b,如果 a 包含在 b 的拓扑闭包中,则 \(a \sqsubseteq b\) 这两个概念是对应的。特化集合是一个部分有序集合,它被赋予了一个更粗的前序关系 \( \sqsubseteq \)。我们证明,每个特化集合都可以嵌入到与某个拓扑空间自然相关的特化集合中,其中的有序关系对应于集合论上的包容。我们用类似的方法定义了特化半格,并证明了相应的嵌入定理。特化半格具有合并特性。一些基本拓扑学事实和概念在这个看似非常弱的环境中得到了恢复。这些结构之所以令人感兴趣,是因为它们也出现在许多相当不同的背景中,甚至远离拓扑学。
An algebraization of the notion of topology has been proposed more than 70 years ago in a classical paper by McKinsey and Tarski, leading to an area of research still active today, with connections to algebra, geometry, logic and many applications, in particular, to modal logics. In McKinsey and Tarski’s setting the model theoretical notion of homomorphism does not correspond to the notion of continuity. We notice that the two notions correspond if instead we consider a preorder relation \( \sqsubseteq \) defined by \(a \sqsubseteq b\) if a is contained in the topological closure of b, for a, b subsets of some topological space. A specialization poset is a partially ordered set endowed with a further coarser preorder relation \( \sqsubseteq \). We show that every specialization poset can be embedded in the specialization poset naturally associated to some topological space, where the order relation corresponds to set-theoretical inclusion. Specialization semilattices are defined in an analogous way and the corresponding embedding theorem is proved. Specialization semilattices have the amalgamation property. Some basic topological facts and notions are recovered in this apparently very weak setting. The interest of these structures arises from the fact that they also occur in many rather disparate contexts, even far removed from topology.