{"title":"拓展框架的解释功能,了解边缘化学生参与合作与学习的情况","authors":"Soo-Yean Shim, Christina Krist","doi":"10.1007/s11422-022-10122-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This commentary to Ha and Kim’s article suggests three ways to expand the interpretive functions of framing to explore and support marginalized students’ participation in collaboration and learning, based on our comprehensive review of Ha and Kim’s and other relevant studies. We argue that framing can be a useful tool for (1) understanding both moment-to-moment and long-term changes in classroom communities, (2) gaining insights into students’ identity work and figured worlds, and (3) exploring the dynamics of students’ epistemological and positional perceptions. Researchers and practitioners could build on these arguments about the expansive uses of framing to foster students’ equitable interactions and productive learning in classroom communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":47132,"journal":{"name":"Cultural Studies of Science Education","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Expanding the interpretive functions of framing for understanding marginalized students’ participation in collaboration and learning\",\"authors\":\"Soo-Yean Shim, Christina Krist\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11422-022-10122-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This commentary to Ha and Kim’s article suggests three ways to expand the interpretive functions of framing to explore and support marginalized students’ participation in collaboration and learning, based on our comprehensive review of Ha and Kim’s and other relevant studies. We argue that framing can be a useful tool for (1) understanding both moment-to-moment and long-term changes in classroom communities, (2) gaining insights into students’ identity work and figured worlds, and (3) exploring the dynamics of students’ epistemological and positional perceptions. Researchers and practitioners could build on these arguments about the expansive uses of framing to foster students’ equitable interactions and productive learning in classroom communities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47132,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cultural Studies of Science Education\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cultural Studies of Science Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-022-10122-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CULTURAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultural Studies of Science Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-022-10122-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文是对 Ha 和 Kim 文章的评论,根据我们对 Ha 和 Kim 以及其他相关研究的全面回顾,提出了三种方法来扩展框架的解释功能,以探索和支持边缘化学生参与合作与学习。我们认为,框架可以作为一种有用的工具,用于:(1)理解课堂社区的瞬间变化和长期变化;(2)深入了解学生的身份工作和形象世界;(3)探索学生认识论和立场观念的动态变化。研究人员和实践者可以在这些论点的基础上,扩大框架的使用范围,促进学生在课堂社区中的平等互动和富有成效的学习。
Expanding the interpretive functions of framing for understanding marginalized students’ participation in collaboration and learning
This commentary to Ha and Kim’s article suggests three ways to expand the interpretive functions of framing to explore and support marginalized students’ participation in collaboration and learning, based on our comprehensive review of Ha and Kim’s and other relevant studies. We argue that framing can be a useful tool for (1) understanding both moment-to-moment and long-term changes in classroom communities, (2) gaining insights into students’ identity work and figured worlds, and (3) exploring the dynamics of students’ epistemological and positional perceptions. Researchers and practitioners could build on these arguments about the expansive uses of framing to foster students’ equitable interactions and productive learning in classroom communities.
期刊介绍:
Cultural Studies of Science Education is a peer reviewed journal that provides an interactive platform for researchers working in the multidisciplinary fields of cultural studies and science education. By taking a cultural approach and paying attention to theories from cultural studies, this new journal reflects the current diversity in the study of science education in a variety of contexts, including schools, museums, zoos, laboratories, parks and gardens, aquariums and community development, maintenance and restoration.
This journal
focuses on science education as a cultural, cross-age, cross-class, and cross-disciplinary phenomenon;
publishes articles that have an explicit and appropriate connection with and immersion in cultural studies;
seeks articles that have theory development as an integral aspect of the data presentation;
establishes bridges between science education and social studies of science, public understanding of science, science/technology and human values, and science and literacy;
builds new communities at the interface of currently distinct discourses;
aims to be a catalyst that forges new genres of and for scholarly dissemination;
provides an interactive dialogue that includes the editors, members of the review board, and selected international scholars;
publishes manuscripts that encompass all forms of scholarly activity;
includes research articles, essays, OP-ED, critical, comments, criticisms and letters on emerging issues of significance.