国际财务报告准则第 7 号--金融工具的披露与风险认知

Jannis Bischof,Michael Ebert
{"title":"国际财务报告准则第 7 号--金融工具的披露与风险认知","authors":"Jannis Bischof,Michael Ebert","doi":"10.1007/BF03396908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are many choices when reporting and disclosing financial instruments under IFRS 7. Behavioral theory suggests that the label used to present a financial instrument affects investors’ risk perception. We use an experimental setting to analyze how and why the European practice of reporting financial instruments by measurement categories affects the risk perception of nonprofessional investors. We find that risk perception is associated with management’s choice of a measurement category. Our results imply that there should be a wider debate about possible presentation formats for financial instruments, as the current format does not necessarily ensure a neutral presentation.","PeriodicalId":43001,"journal":{"name":"SCHMALENBACH BUSINESS REVIEW","volume":"32 1","pages":"276-308"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"IFRS 7 Disclosures and Risk Perception of Financial Instruments\",\"authors\":\"Jannis Bischof,Michael Ebert\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/BF03396908\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There are many choices when reporting and disclosing financial instruments under IFRS 7. Behavioral theory suggests that the label used to present a financial instrument affects investors’ risk perception. We use an experimental setting to analyze how and why the European practice of reporting financial instruments by measurement categories affects the risk perception of nonprofessional investors. We find that risk perception is associated with management’s choice of a measurement category. Our results imply that there should be a wider debate about possible presentation formats for financial instruments, as the current format does not necessarily ensure a neutral presentation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43001,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SCHMALENBACH BUSINESS REVIEW\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"276-308\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SCHMALENBACH BUSINESS REVIEW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03396908\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SCHMALENBACH BUSINESS REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03396908","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在根据《国际财务报告准则》第 7 号报告和披露金融工具时有很多选择。行为理论认为,金融工具的标签会影响投资者的风险认知。我们通过实验来分析欧洲按计量类别报告金融工具的做法如何以及为何会影响非专业投资者的风险认知。我们发现,风险认知与管理层对计量类别的选择有关。我们的研究结果表明,应该对金融工具的可能列报格式进行更广泛的讨论,因为目前的格式并不一定能确保中性列报。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
IFRS 7 Disclosures and Risk Perception of Financial Instruments
There are many choices when reporting and disclosing financial instruments under IFRS 7. Behavioral theory suggests that the label used to present a financial instrument affects investors’ risk perception. We use an experimental setting to analyze how and why the European practice of reporting financial instruments by measurement categories affects the risk perception of nonprofessional investors. We find that risk perception is associated with management’s choice of a measurement category. Our results imply that there should be a wider debate about possible presentation formats for financial instruments, as the current format does not necessarily ensure a neutral presentation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Fama-French Five-Factor Model Plus Momentum: Evidence for the German Market Special Section: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Challenges in Managing Smart Products and Services It Takes More than Two to Tango: Identifying Roles and Patterns in Multi-Actor Smart Service Innovation Discussion of “The Market for Reviews: Strategic Behavior of Online Product Reviewers with Monetary Incentives” Special Section: Economic Analyses in Business Administration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1