{"title":"近视方法","authors":"Alan P. Ker","doi":"10.1111/cjag.12348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Method myopia is defined as theoretical rhetoric absent empirical discernment regarding flavor-of-the-day econometric methodologies. This Fellows Address discusses why method myopia is pervasive, what factors contribute to the pervasiveness, why is likely it to increase, and finally, a possible remedy. To that end, incentive structures facing researchers, reviewers, and editors are considered within the life-cycle of a typical econometric methodology. Considering our discipline is empirically driven, there are potentially large costs by using flavor-of-the-day methodologies when an alternative -- possibly leading to different economic results and policy responses -- is the appropriate method. Furthermore, method myopia can notably restrict the set of research problems examined thereby creating additional, potentially large, opportunity costs. Finally, over-selling the superiority/completeness/correctness of results from such flavor-of-the-day methodologies to policy makers can not only be costly in the particular case, but can undermine the long-term credibility of our disciplinary advice to policy makers.</p>","PeriodicalId":55291,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics-Revue Canadienne D Agroeconomie","volume":"72 2","pages":"199-204"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cjag.12348","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Method myopia\",\"authors\":\"Alan P. Ker\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cjag.12348\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Method myopia is defined as theoretical rhetoric absent empirical discernment regarding flavor-of-the-day econometric methodologies. This Fellows Address discusses why method myopia is pervasive, what factors contribute to the pervasiveness, why is likely it to increase, and finally, a possible remedy. To that end, incentive structures facing researchers, reviewers, and editors are considered within the life-cycle of a typical econometric methodology. Considering our discipline is empirically driven, there are potentially large costs by using flavor-of-the-day methodologies when an alternative -- possibly leading to different economic results and policy responses -- is the appropriate method. Furthermore, method myopia can notably restrict the set of research problems examined thereby creating additional, potentially large, opportunity costs. Finally, over-selling the superiority/completeness/correctness of results from such flavor-of-the-day methodologies to policy makers can not only be costly in the particular case, but can undermine the long-term credibility of our disciplinary advice to policy makers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55291,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics-Revue Canadienne D Agroeconomie\",\"volume\":\"72 2\",\"pages\":\"199-204\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cjag.12348\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics-Revue Canadienne D Agroeconomie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cjag.12348\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics-Revue Canadienne D Agroeconomie","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cjag.12348","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Method myopia is defined as theoretical rhetoric absent empirical discernment regarding flavor-of-the-day econometric methodologies. This Fellows Address discusses why method myopia is pervasive, what factors contribute to the pervasiveness, why is likely it to increase, and finally, a possible remedy. To that end, incentive structures facing researchers, reviewers, and editors are considered within the life-cycle of a typical econometric methodology. Considering our discipline is empirically driven, there are potentially large costs by using flavor-of-the-day methodologies when an alternative -- possibly leading to different economic results and policy responses -- is the appropriate method. Furthermore, method myopia can notably restrict the set of research problems examined thereby creating additional, potentially large, opportunity costs. Finally, over-selling the superiority/completeness/correctness of results from such flavor-of-the-day methodologies to policy makers can not only be costly in the particular case, but can undermine the long-term credibility of our disciplinary advice to policy makers.
期刊介绍:
The Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie (CJAE) serves as a platform for scholarly research in agricultural, resource, and environmental economics, covering topics such as agri-food, agri-business, policy, resource utilization, and environmental impacts. It publishes a range of theoretical, applied and policy-related articles.