VioDroid-Finder:自动评估安卓应用程序的合规性和一致性

IF 3.5 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING Empirical Software Engineering Pub Date : 2024-05-03 DOI:10.1007/s10664-024-10470-8
Junren Chen, Cheng Huang, Jiaxuan Han
{"title":"VioDroid-Finder:自动评估安卓应用程序的合规性和一致性","authors":"Junren Chen, Cheng Huang, Jiaxuan Han","doi":"10.1007/s10664-024-10470-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Rapid growth in the variety and quantity of apps makes it difficult for users to protect their privacy, although existing regulations have been introduced and the Android ecosystem is constantly being improved, there are still violations as privacy policies may not fully comply with regulations, and app behavior may not be fully consistent with privacy policies. To solve such issues, this paper proposes an automated method called VioDroid-Finder aiming at the evaluation of compliance and consistency for Android apps. We first study existing common regulations and conclude the privacy policy content into 7 aspects (i.e., privacy categories), for privacy policies, different compliance rules are required to be complied with in each privacy category. Secondly, we present a policy structure parser model based on the structure extraction/rebuilding method (which can convert the unstructured text to an XML tree) and subtitle similarity calculation algorithm. Thirdly, we propose a violation analyzer using the BERT model to classify each sentence in the privacy policy, we collect existing issues and combine them with manual observations to define 6 types of violations and detect them based on classification results. Then, we propose an inconsistency analyzer that converts permissions, APIs, and GUI into a set of personal information based on static analysis, inconsistencies are detected by comparing that set with personal information declared in the privacy policy. Finally, we evaluate 600 Chinese apps using the proposed method, from which we detect many violations and inconsistencies reflecting the current widespread privacy violation issues.</p>","PeriodicalId":11525,"journal":{"name":"Empirical Software Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"VioDroid-Finder: automated evaluation of compliance and consistency for Android apps\",\"authors\":\"Junren Chen, Cheng Huang, Jiaxuan Han\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10664-024-10470-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Rapid growth in the variety and quantity of apps makes it difficult for users to protect their privacy, although existing regulations have been introduced and the Android ecosystem is constantly being improved, there are still violations as privacy policies may not fully comply with regulations, and app behavior may not be fully consistent with privacy policies. To solve such issues, this paper proposes an automated method called VioDroid-Finder aiming at the evaluation of compliance and consistency for Android apps. We first study existing common regulations and conclude the privacy policy content into 7 aspects (i.e., privacy categories), for privacy policies, different compliance rules are required to be complied with in each privacy category. Secondly, we present a policy structure parser model based on the structure extraction/rebuilding method (which can convert the unstructured text to an XML tree) and subtitle similarity calculation algorithm. Thirdly, we propose a violation analyzer using the BERT model to classify each sentence in the privacy policy, we collect existing issues and combine them with manual observations to define 6 types of violations and detect them based on classification results. Then, we propose an inconsistency analyzer that converts permissions, APIs, and GUI into a set of personal information based on static analysis, inconsistencies are detected by comparing that set with personal information declared in the privacy policy. Finally, we evaluate 600 Chinese apps using the proposed method, from which we detect many violations and inconsistencies reflecting the current widespread privacy violation issues.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11525,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Empirical Software Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Empirical Software Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-024-10470-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Empirical Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-024-10470-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管现有法规已经出台,安卓生态系统也在不断完善,但由于隐私政策可能不完全符合法规,应用程序行为可能与隐私政策不完全一致,因此仍然存在违规现象。为了解决这些问题,本文提出了一种名为 VioDroid-Finder 的自动方法,旨在评估安卓应用程序的合规性和一致性。我们首先研究了现有的通用法规,并将隐私政策内容总结为 7 个方面(即隐私类别),对于隐私政策,每个隐私类别需要遵守不同的合规规则。其次,我们提出了基于结构提取/重建方法(可将非结构化文本转换为 XML 树)和字幕相似度计算算法的政策结构解析器模型。第三,我们提出了一个违规分析器,利用 BERT 模型对隐私政策中的每句话进行分类,我们收集现有的问题并结合人工观察,定义了 6 种违规类型,并根据分类结果进行检测。然后,我们提出了一个不一致分析器,它基于静态分析将权限、API 和图形用户界面转换成一组个人信息,通过比较这组信息和隐私政策中声明的个人信息来检测不一致之处。最后,我们使用提出的方法对 600 个中文应用程序进行了评估,从中发现了许多违规和不一致之处,反映了当前普遍存在的侵犯隐私问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
VioDroid-Finder: automated evaluation of compliance and consistency for Android apps

Rapid growth in the variety and quantity of apps makes it difficult for users to protect their privacy, although existing regulations have been introduced and the Android ecosystem is constantly being improved, there are still violations as privacy policies may not fully comply with regulations, and app behavior may not be fully consistent with privacy policies. To solve such issues, this paper proposes an automated method called VioDroid-Finder aiming at the evaluation of compliance and consistency for Android apps. We first study existing common regulations and conclude the privacy policy content into 7 aspects (i.e., privacy categories), for privacy policies, different compliance rules are required to be complied with in each privacy category. Secondly, we present a policy structure parser model based on the structure extraction/rebuilding method (which can convert the unstructured text to an XML tree) and subtitle similarity calculation algorithm. Thirdly, we propose a violation analyzer using the BERT model to classify each sentence in the privacy policy, we collect existing issues and combine them with manual observations to define 6 types of violations and detect them based on classification results. Then, we propose an inconsistency analyzer that converts permissions, APIs, and GUI into a set of personal information based on static analysis, inconsistencies are detected by comparing that set with personal information declared in the privacy policy. Finally, we evaluate 600 Chinese apps using the proposed method, from which we detect many violations and inconsistencies reflecting the current widespread privacy violation issues.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Empirical Software Engineering
Empirical Software Engineering 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
12.20%
发文量
169
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Empirical Software Engineering provides a forum for applied software engineering research with a strong empirical component, and a venue for publishing empirical results relevant to both researchers and practitioners. Empirical studies presented here usually involve the collection and analysis of data and experience that can be used to characterize, evaluate and reveal relationships between software development deliverables, practices, and technologies. Over time, it is expected that such empirical results will form a body of knowledge leading to widely accepted and well-formed theories. The journal also offers industrial experience reports detailing the application of software technologies - processes, methods, or tools - and their effectiveness in industrial settings. Empirical Software Engineering promotes the publication of industry-relevant research, to address the significant gap between research and practice.
期刊最新文献
An empirical study on developers’ shared conversations with ChatGPT in GitHub pull requests and issues Quality issues in machine learning software systems An empirical study of token-based micro commits Software product line testing: a systematic literature review Consensus task interaction trace recommender to guide developers’ software navigation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1