从实践者的角度看人工智能伦理:基础理论文献综述

IF 3.5 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING Empirical Software Engineering Pub Date : 2024-05-06 DOI:10.1007/s10664-024-10465-5
Aastha Pant, Rashina Hoda, Chakkrit Tantithamthavorn, Burak Turhan
{"title":"从实践者的角度看人工智能伦理:基础理论文献综述","authors":"Aastha Pant, Rashina Hoda, Chakkrit Tantithamthavorn, Burak Turhan","doi":"10.1007/s10664-024-10465-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The term ethics is widely used, explored, and debated in the context of developing Artificial Intelligence (AI) based software systems. In recent years, numerous incidents have raised the profile of ethical issues in AI development and led to public concerns about the proliferation of AI technology in our everyday lives. But what do we know about the views and experiences of those who develop these systems – the AI practitioners? We conducted a grounded theory literature review (GTLR) of 38 primary empirical studies that included AI practitioners’ views on ethics in AI and analysed them to derive five categories: practitioner <i>awareness</i>, <i>perception</i>, <i>need</i>, <i>challenge</i>, and <i>approach</i>. These are underpinned by multiple codes and concepts that we explain with evidence from the included studies. We present a <i>taxonomy of ethics in AI from practitioners’ viewpoints</i> to assist AI practitioners in identifying and understanding the different aspects of AI ethics. The taxonomy provides a landscape view of the key aspects that concern AI practitioners when it comes to ethics in AI. We also share an agenda for future research studies and recommendations for practitioners, managers, and organisations to help in their efforts to better consider and implement ethics in AI.</p>","PeriodicalId":11525,"journal":{"name":"Empirical Software Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ethics in AI through the practitioner’s view: a grounded theory literature review\",\"authors\":\"Aastha Pant, Rashina Hoda, Chakkrit Tantithamthavorn, Burak Turhan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10664-024-10465-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The term ethics is widely used, explored, and debated in the context of developing Artificial Intelligence (AI) based software systems. In recent years, numerous incidents have raised the profile of ethical issues in AI development and led to public concerns about the proliferation of AI technology in our everyday lives. But what do we know about the views and experiences of those who develop these systems – the AI practitioners? We conducted a grounded theory literature review (GTLR) of 38 primary empirical studies that included AI practitioners’ views on ethics in AI and analysed them to derive five categories: practitioner <i>awareness</i>, <i>perception</i>, <i>need</i>, <i>challenge</i>, and <i>approach</i>. These are underpinned by multiple codes and concepts that we explain with evidence from the included studies. We present a <i>taxonomy of ethics in AI from practitioners’ viewpoints</i> to assist AI practitioners in identifying and understanding the different aspects of AI ethics. The taxonomy provides a landscape view of the key aspects that concern AI practitioners when it comes to ethics in AI. We also share an agenda for future research studies and recommendations for practitioners, managers, and organisations to help in their efforts to better consider and implement ethics in AI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11525,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Empirical Software Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Empirical Software Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-024-10465-5\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Empirical Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-024-10465-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在开发基于人工智能(AI)的软件系统时,伦理一词被广泛使用、探讨和辩论。近年来,众多事件凸显了人工智能开发中的伦理问题,并引发了公众对人工智能技术在日常生活中扩散的担忧。但是,我们对这些系统的开发者--人工智能从业者--的观点和经验了解多少呢?我们对包含人工智能从业人员对人工智能伦理看法的 38 项主要实证研究进行了基础理论文献综述(GTLR),并通过分析得出了五个类别:从业人员意识、认知、需求、挑战和方法。这些类别由多个代码和概念支撑,我们通过所纳入研究的证据对这些代码和概念进行了解释。我们从从业人员的角度提出了人工智能伦理分类法,以帮助人工智能从业人员识别和理解人工智能伦理的不同方面。该分类法提供了人工智能从业人员在人工智能伦理方面所关注的关键方面的全景视图。我们还为从业人员、管理人员和组织分享了未来研究的议程和建议,以帮助他们更好地考虑和实施人工智能伦理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ethics in AI through the practitioner’s view: a grounded theory literature review

The term ethics is widely used, explored, and debated in the context of developing Artificial Intelligence (AI) based software systems. In recent years, numerous incidents have raised the profile of ethical issues in AI development and led to public concerns about the proliferation of AI technology in our everyday lives. But what do we know about the views and experiences of those who develop these systems – the AI practitioners? We conducted a grounded theory literature review (GTLR) of 38 primary empirical studies that included AI practitioners’ views on ethics in AI and analysed them to derive five categories: practitioner awareness, perception, need, challenge, and approach. These are underpinned by multiple codes and concepts that we explain with evidence from the included studies. We present a taxonomy of ethics in AI from practitioners’ viewpoints to assist AI practitioners in identifying and understanding the different aspects of AI ethics. The taxonomy provides a landscape view of the key aspects that concern AI practitioners when it comes to ethics in AI. We also share an agenda for future research studies and recommendations for practitioners, managers, and organisations to help in their efforts to better consider and implement ethics in AI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Empirical Software Engineering
Empirical Software Engineering 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
12.20%
发文量
169
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Empirical Software Engineering provides a forum for applied software engineering research with a strong empirical component, and a venue for publishing empirical results relevant to both researchers and practitioners. Empirical studies presented here usually involve the collection and analysis of data and experience that can be used to characterize, evaluate and reveal relationships between software development deliverables, practices, and technologies. Over time, it is expected that such empirical results will form a body of knowledge leading to widely accepted and well-formed theories. The journal also offers industrial experience reports detailing the application of software technologies - processes, methods, or tools - and their effectiveness in industrial settings. Empirical Software Engineering promotes the publication of industry-relevant research, to address the significant gap between research and practice.
期刊最新文献
An empirical study on developers’ shared conversations with ChatGPT in GitHub pull requests and issues Quality issues in machine learning software systems An empirical study of token-based micro commits Software product line testing: a systematic literature review Consensus task interaction trace recommender to guide developers’ software navigation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1