{"title":"超声波检查在确定小肠梗阻方面的诊断性能；系统性回顾和 Meta 分析。","authors":"Mohsen Motavaselian, Mehrdad Farrokhi, Parisa Jafari Khouzani, Atousa Moghadam Fard, Fatemeh Daeizadeh, Mahya Pourrahimi, Reyhaneh Mehrabani, Reza Amani-Beni, Masoud Farrokhi, Faezeh Jalayer Sarnaghy, Asal Mir, Reza Tavakoli, Heidar Fadavian, Reza Mehdinezhad, Parisa Masoudikabir, Maoumeh Moallem, Tohid Karami, Roozbeh Roohinezhad, Yalda Yazdani, Didar Ghasemi, Farideh Rezaeizadeh, Alireza Hadizadeh, Rojin Sarallah, Ashkan Shafigh, Solmaz Aminpour, Amirhossein Esfahani, Seyedsaber Mirabdali, Zahrasadat Hosseini, Farahnaz Saharkhiz, Mehrzad Khodsiani, Fahimeh Ebrahimi Tirtashi, Shabnam Esmailian Dehkordi, Nafise Sadat Amini, Mahsa Aran, Zohreh Abolghasemfard, Nazanin Sanjarinia, Zeynab Abdollahi, Fatemeh Abediankenari, Erfan Ghadirzadeh, Mehran Khodashenas, Ali Jahanshahi","doi":"10.22037/aaem.v12i1.2265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Small bowel obstruction (SBO) is known as a common cause of acute abdominal complaints in the emergency department (ED). The modality of choice for the diagnosis of SBO has not yet been established. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the accuracy of ultrasonography for the diagnosis of SBO.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Systematic search was performed on five electronic databases including Medline, Scopus, Web of Sciences, Embase, and Cochrane Library, and the retrieval period was from the inception of each database to November 2023. The quality of the included studies were investigated using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2). The pooled values of diagnostic characteristics for ultrasonography were estimated using meta-Disc and Stata statistical software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-one studies with a total of 1977 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled estimate for sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the summary ROC curve of ultrasonography for diagnosing SBO were 0.93 (95% CI: 0.91-0.95), 0.8 (95% CI: 0.77-0.83), 5.69 (95% CI: 3.64-8.89), 0.1 (95% CI: 0.07-0.16), 83.51 (95% CI: 18.12-182.91) and 0.96, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of this meta-analysis showed that the utilization of ultrasonography holds promise as a diagnostic imaging for SBO with high accuracy. However, additional worldwide studies are essential to get more evidence on the value of ultrasonography for the diagnosis of SBO.</p>","PeriodicalId":8146,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine","volume":"12 1","pages":"e33"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11077389/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic Performance of Ultrasonography for Identification of Small Bowel Obstruction; a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Mohsen Motavaselian, Mehrdad Farrokhi, Parisa Jafari Khouzani, Atousa Moghadam Fard, Fatemeh Daeizadeh, Mahya Pourrahimi, Reyhaneh Mehrabani, Reza Amani-Beni, Masoud Farrokhi, Faezeh Jalayer Sarnaghy, Asal Mir, Reza Tavakoli, Heidar Fadavian, Reza Mehdinezhad, Parisa Masoudikabir, Maoumeh Moallem, Tohid Karami, Roozbeh Roohinezhad, Yalda Yazdani, Didar Ghasemi, Farideh Rezaeizadeh, Alireza Hadizadeh, Rojin Sarallah, Ashkan Shafigh, Solmaz Aminpour, Amirhossein Esfahani, Seyedsaber Mirabdali, Zahrasadat Hosseini, Farahnaz Saharkhiz, Mehrzad Khodsiani, Fahimeh Ebrahimi Tirtashi, Shabnam Esmailian Dehkordi, Nafise Sadat Amini, Mahsa Aran, Zohreh Abolghasemfard, Nazanin Sanjarinia, Zeynab Abdollahi, Fatemeh Abediankenari, Erfan Ghadirzadeh, Mehran Khodashenas, Ali Jahanshahi\",\"doi\":\"10.22037/aaem.v12i1.2265\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Small bowel obstruction (SBO) is known as a common cause of acute abdominal complaints in the emergency department (ED). The modality of choice for the diagnosis of SBO has not yet been established. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the accuracy of ultrasonography for the diagnosis of SBO.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Systematic search was performed on five electronic databases including Medline, Scopus, Web of Sciences, Embase, and Cochrane Library, and the retrieval period was from the inception of each database to November 2023. The quality of the included studies were investigated using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2). The pooled values of diagnostic characteristics for ultrasonography were estimated using meta-Disc and Stata statistical software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-one studies with a total of 1977 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled estimate for sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the summary ROC curve of ultrasonography for diagnosing SBO were 0.93 (95% CI: 0.91-0.95), 0.8 (95% CI: 0.77-0.83), 5.69 (95% CI: 3.64-8.89), 0.1 (95% CI: 0.07-0.16), 83.51 (95% CI: 18.12-182.91) and 0.96, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of this meta-analysis showed that the utilization of ultrasonography holds promise as a diagnostic imaging for SBO with high accuracy. However, additional worldwide studies are essential to get more evidence on the value of ultrasonography for the diagnosis of SBO.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8146,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"e33\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11077389/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22037/aaem.v12i1.2265\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22037/aaem.v12i1.2265","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Diagnostic Performance of Ultrasonography for Identification of Small Bowel Obstruction; a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Introduction: Small bowel obstruction (SBO) is known as a common cause of acute abdominal complaints in the emergency department (ED). The modality of choice for the diagnosis of SBO has not yet been established. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the accuracy of ultrasonography for the diagnosis of SBO.
Methods: Systematic search was performed on five electronic databases including Medline, Scopus, Web of Sciences, Embase, and Cochrane Library, and the retrieval period was from the inception of each database to November 2023. The quality of the included studies were investigated using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2). The pooled values of diagnostic characteristics for ultrasonography were estimated using meta-Disc and Stata statistical software.
Results: Twenty-one studies with a total of 1977 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled estimate for sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the summary ROC curve of ultrasonography for diagnosing SBO were 0.93 (95% CI: 0.91-0.95), 0.8 (95% CI: 0.77-0.83), 5.69 (95% CI: 3.64-8.89), 0.1 (95% CI: 0.07-0.16), 83.51 (95% CI: 18.12-182.91) and 0.96, respectively.
Conclusion: The findings of this meta-analysis showed that the utilization of ultrasonography holds promise as a diagnostic imaging for SBO with high accuracy. However, additional worldwide studies are essential to get more evidence on the value of ultrasonography for the diagnosis of SBO.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
