优化分诊:评估休克指数、小儿年龄调整指数,作为改进急诊严重程度指数误诊的辅助手段。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pediatric emergency care Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-09 DOI:10.1097/PEC.0000000000003171
Eilan Levkowitz, Robert Gibson, Hongyan Xu, Li Fang Zhang, Katherine Eskine, Brian Buck, Michael Bruno, Desiree Seeyave
{"title":"优化分诊:评估休克指数、小儿年龄调整指数,作为改进急诊严重程度指数误诊的辅助手段。","authors":"Eilan Levkowitz, Robert Gibson, Hongyan Xu, Li Fang Zhang, Katherine Eskine, Brian Buck, Michael Bruno, Desiree Seeyave","doi":"10.1097/PEC.0000000000003171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We investigated the diagnostic value of shock index, pediatric age-adjusted (SIPA) in predicting Emergency Severity Index level 3 patients' outcomes. Secondary objectives included exploring the impact of fever and participant variables on SIPA's predictive ability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review identified children aged 1 to 15 years triaged as a level 3 in the emergency department between January 2018 and December 2021. Shock index, pediatric age-adjusted thresholds based on age, 1 to 6 years (>1.2), 7 to 12 years (>1.0), and 13 to 17 years (>0.9), were used. We assessed elevated SIPA and SIPA corrected for fever to evaluate associations with outcomes and interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our findings, involving 192 patients, revealed that elevated SIPA demonstrated enhanced discrimination relative to nonelevated SIPA. Patients with elevated SIPA had more average interventions: 1.14 versus 0.74, P < 0.016; average interventions using SIPA corrected for fever: 1.14 versus 0.77, P < 0.006; average interventions controlling for race and sex: 1.15 versus 0.71, P < 0.001; hospital admission: 64.4% versus 42.9%, P = 0.004; hospital length of stay (LOS): 3.06 days (SE, 0.42) versus 1.46 days (SE, 0.23); hospital LOS using SIPA corrected for fever: 2.75 days (SE, 0.44) versus 1.72 days (SE, 0.24); ventilatory support: 16.44% versus 3.36%, P < 0.002; fluid bolus: 28.77% versus 14.29%, P < 0.015; intravenous medications (antibiotics, antiepileptics, immune globulin, albumin): 45.21% versus 30.25%, P < 0.036. There was no difference between other interventions, pediatric intensive care admission, and LOS between the 2 groups. Importantly, SIPA was unaffected by fever, race, or sex.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Shock index, pediatric age-adjusted identifies level 3 Emergency Severity Index pediatric patients more likely to require hospital admission, longer LOS, and a lifesaving intervention especially ventilatory support, intravenous fluids, or specific intravenous medications. Shock index, pediatric age-adjusted's predictive ability remained unaffected by fever, race, or sex, making it a valuable tool in preventing mistriage and justifying inclusion in the Emergency Severity Index danger zone vitals criteria for up-triage.</p>","PeriodicalId":19996,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric emergency care","volume":" ","pages":"11-16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing Triage: Assessing Shock Index, Pediatric Age-Adjusted as an Adjunct to Improve Emergency Severity Index Mistriage.\",\"authors\":\"Eilan Levkowitz, Robert Gibson, Hongyan Xu, Li Fang Zhang, Katherine Eskine, Brian Buck, Michael Bruno, Desiree Seeyave\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PEC.0000000000003171\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We investigated the diagnostic value of shock index, pediatric age-adjusted (SIPA) in predicting Emergency Severity Index level 3 patients' outcomes. Secondary objectives included exploring the impact of fever and participant variables on SIPA's predictive ability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review identified children aged 1 to 15 years triaged as a level 3 in the emergency department between January 2018 and December 2021. Shock index, pediatric age-adjusted thresholds based on age, 1 to 6 years (>1.2), 7 to 12 years (>1.0), and 13 to 17 years (>0.9), were used. We assessed elevated SIPA and SIPA corrected for fever to evaluate associations with outcomes and interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our findings, involving 192 patients, revealed that elevated SIPA demonstrated enhanced discrimination relative to nonelevated SIPA. Patients with elevated SIPA had more average interventions: 1.14 versus 0.74, P < 0.016; average interventions using SIPA corrected for fever: 1.14 versus 0.77, P < 0.006; average interventions controlling for race and sex: 1.15 versus 0.71, P < 0.001; hospital admission: 64.4% versus 42.9%, P = 0.004; hospital length of stay (LOS): 3.06 days (SE, 0.42) versus 1.46 days (SE, 0.23); hospital LOS using SIPA corrected for fever: 2.75 days (SE, 0.44) versus 1.72 days (SE, 0.24); ventilatory support: 16.44% versus 3.36%, P < 0.002; fluid bolus: 28.77% versus 14.29%, P < 0.015; intravenous medications (antibiotics, antiepileptics, immune globulin, albumin): 45.21% versus 30.25%, P < 0.036. There was no difference between other interventions, pediatric intensive care admission, and LOS between the 2 groups. Importantly, SIPA was unaffected by fever, race, or sex.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Shock index, pediatric age-adjusted identifies level 3 Emergency Severity Index pediatric patients more likely to require hospital admission, longer LOS, and a lifesaving intervention especially ventilatory support, intravenous fluids, or specific intravenous medications. Shock index, pediatric age-adjusted's predictive ability remained unaffected by fever, race, or sex, making it a valuable tool in preventing mistriage and justifying inclusion in the Emergency Severity Index danger zone vitals criteria for up-triage.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19996,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric emergency care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"11-16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric emergency care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000003171\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric emergency care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000003171","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的我们研究了儿科年龄调整后休克指数(SIPA)在预测急诊严重程度指数三级患者预后方面的诊断价值。次要目标包括探讨发热和参与者变量对 SIPA 预测能力的影响:一项回顾性病历审查确定了 2018 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月期间在急诊科被分诊为 3 级的 1 至 15 岁儿童。休克指数、儿科年龄调整阈值基于年龄,分别为 1 至 6 岁(>1.2)、7 至 12 岁(>1.0)和 13 至 17 岁(>0.9)。我们评估了升高的 SIPA 和发热校正后的 SIPA,以评估与结果和干预措施的关联:我们对 192 名患者的研究结果表明,相对于未升高的 SIPA,升高的 SIPA 显示出更强的辨别能力。SIPA 升高的患者平均干预次数更多:1.14对0.74,P<0.016;使用SIPA校正发热的平均干预次数:1.14对0.77,P<0.006;控制种族和性别的平均干预次数:1.15对0.71,P<0.001;入院率:64.4%对42.9%,P=0.004;住院时间(LOS):3.06天(SE:0.05):3.06天(SE,0.42)对1.46天(SE,0.23);使用SIPA校正发热的住院时间:2.75天(SE,0.44)对1.72天(SE,0.24);呼吸支持:16.44%对3.36%,P<0.002;液体栓塞:28.77%对14.29%,P<0.015;静脉用药(抗生素、抗癫痫药、免疫球蛋白、白蛋白):45.21%对30.25%,P < 0.036。其他干预措施、儿科重症监护入院率和住院时间在两组之间没有差异。重要的是,SIPA不受发热、种族或性别的影响:根据休克指数、儿科年龄调整值可确定3级急诊严重程度指数的儿科患者更有可能需要入院治疗、更长的住院时间以及救生干预措施,尤其是呼吸支持、静脉输液或特殊静脉用药。经年龄调整的儿科休克指数的预测能力不受发热、种族或性别的影响,因此是防止误诊的重要工具,也是将其纳入急诊严重程度指数危险区生命体征标准以进行上转的合理依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Optimizing Triage: Assessing Shock Index, Pediatric Age-Adjusted as an Adjunct to Improve Emergency Severity Index Mistriage.

Objective: We investigated the diagnostic value of shock index, pediatric age-adjusted (SIPA) in predicting Emergency Severity Index level 3 patients' outcomes. Secondary objectives included exploring the impact of fever and participant variables on SIPA's predictive ability.

Methods: A retrospective chart review identified children aged 1 to 15 years triaged as a level 3 in the emergency department between January 2018 and December 2021. Shock index, pediatric age-adjusted thresholds based on age, 1 to 6 years (>1.2), 7 to 12 years (>1.0), and 13 to 17 years (>0.9), were used. We assessed elevated SIPA and SIPA corrected for fever to evaluate associations with outcomes and interventions.

Results: Our findings, involving 192 patients, revealed that elevated SIPA demonstrated enhanced discrimination relative to nonelevated SIPA. Patients with elevated SIPA had more average interventions: 1.14 versus 0.74, P < 0.016; average interventions using SIPA corrected for fever: 1.14 versus 0.77, P < 0.006; average interventions controlling for race and sex: 1.15 versus 0.71, P < 0.001; hospital admission: 64.4% versus 42.9%, P = 0.004; hospital length of stay (LOS): 3.06 days (SE, 0.42) versus 1.46 days (SE, 0.23); hospital LOS using SIPA corrected for fever: 2.75 days (SE, 0.44) versus 1.72 days (SE, 0.24); ventilatory support: 16.44% versus 3.36%, P < 0.002; fluid bolus: 28.77% versus 14.29%, P < 0.015; intravenous medications (antibiotics, antiepileptics, immune globulin, albumin): 45.21% versus 30.25%, P < 0.036. There was no difference between other interventions, pediatric intensive care admission, and LOS between the 2 groups. Importantly, SIPA was unaffected by fever, race, or sex.

Conclusions: Shock index, pediatric age-adjusted identifies level 3 Emergency Severity Index pediatric patients more likely to require hospital admission, longer LOS, and a lifesaving intervention especially ventilatory support, intravenous fluids, or specific intravenous medications. Shock index, pediatric age-adjusted's predictive ability remained unaffected by fever, race, or sex, making it a valuable tool in preventing mistriage and justifying inclusion in the Emergency Severity Index danger zone vitals criteria for up-triage.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric emergency care
Pediatric emergency care 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
577
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Emergency Care®, features clinically relevant original articles with an EM perspective on the care of acutely ill or injured children and adolescents. The journal is aimed at both the pediatrician who wants to know more about treating and being compensated for minor emergency cases and the emergency physicians who must treat children or adolescents in more than one case in there.
期刊最新文献
Does Virtual Interviewing Provide the Information for a Satisfactory Rank Decision?: A Perspective From the Pediatric Emergency Medicine Fellowship Interviews. Pharmacotherapy for Agitation Management in a Pediatric Emergency Department. Procedural Entrustment Alignment Between Pediatric Residents and Their Preceptors in the Pediatric Emergency Department. A National Survey of Caregiver Needs and Experiences When Attending the Emergency Department. A Qualitative Assessment of Barriers, Facilitators, and Outcomes in a Simulation-Based Collaborative Quality Improvement Program: The ImPACTS Project.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1