利用国家报告数据验证自然语言处理算法,以改进麻醉相关不良事件的识别:ADVENTURE "研究。

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2024-05-06 DOI:10.1016/j.accpm.2024.101390
Paul M Mertes , Claire Morgand , Paul Barach , Geoffrey Jurkolow , Karen E. Assmann , Edouard Dufetelle , Vincent Susplugas , Bilal Alauddin , Patrick Georges Yavordios , Jean Tourres , Jean-Marc Dumeix , Xavier Capdevila
{"title":"利用国家报告数据验证自然语言处理算法,以改进麻醉相关不良事件的识别:ADVENTURE \"研究。","authors":"Paul M Mertes ,&nbsp;Claire Morgand ,&nbsp;Paul Barach ,&nbsp;Geoffrey Jurkolow ,&nbsp;Karen E. Assmann ,&nbsp;Edouard Dufetelle ,&nbsp;Vincent Susplugas ,&nbsp;Bilal Alauddin ,&nbsp;Patrick Georges Yavordios ,&nbsp;Jean Tourres ,&nbsp;Jean-Marc Dumeix ,&nbsp;Xavier Capdevila","doi":"10.1016/j.accpm.2024.101390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Reporting and analysis of adverse events (AE) is associated with improved health system learning, quality outcomes, and patient safety. Manual text analysis is time-consuming, costly, and prone to human errors. We aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of novel machine learning and natural language processing (NLP) approaches for early predictions of adverse events and provide input to direct quality improvement and patient safety initiatives.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We used machine learning to analyze 9559 continuously reported AE by clinicians and healthcare systems to the French National Health accreditor (HAS) between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2020 . We validated the labeling of 135,000 unique de-identified AE reports and determined the associations between different system's root causes and patient consequences. The model was validated by independent expert anesthesiologists.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The machine learning (ML) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) model trained on 9559 AE datasets accurately categorized 8800 (88%) of reported AE. The three most frequent AE types were “difficult orotracheal intubation” (16.9% of AE reports), “medication error” (10.5%), and “post-induction hypotension” (6.9%). The accuracy of the AI model reached 70.9% sensitivity, 96.6% specificity for “difficult intubation”, 43.2% sensitivity, and 98.9% specificity for “medication error.”</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This unsupervised ML method provides an accurate, automated, AI-supported search algorithm that ranks and helps to understand complex risk patterns and has greater speed, precision, and clarity when compared to manual human data extraction. Machine learning and Natural language processing (NLP) models can effectively be used to process natural language AE reports and augment expert clinician input. This model can support clinical applications and methodological standards and used to better inform and enhance decision-making for improved risk management and patient safety.</p></div><div><h3>Trial Registration</h3><p>The study was approved by the ethics committee of the French Society of Anesthesiology (IRB 00010254-2020-20) and the CNIL (CNIL: 118 58 95) and the study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT: NCT05185479).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48762,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine","volume":"43 4","pages":"Article 101390"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352556824000481/pdfft?md5=209048f02e8f384ce8121fb06025882a&pid=1-s2.0-S2352556824000481-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of a natural language processing algorithm using national reporting data to improve identification of anesthesia-related ADVerse evENTs: The “ADVENTURE” study\",\"authors\":\"Paul M Mertes ,&nbsp;Claire Morgand ,&nbsp;Paul Barach ,&nbsp;Geoffrey Jurkolow ,&nbsp;Karen E. Assmann ,&nbsp;Edouard Dufetelle ,&nbsp;Vincent Susplugas ,&nbsp;Bilal Alauddin ,&nbsp;Patrick Georges Yavordios ,&nbsp;Jean Tourres ,&nbsp;Jean-Marc Dumeix ,&nbsp;Xavier Capdevila\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.accpm.2024.101390\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Reporting and analysis of adverse events (AE) is associated with improved health system learning, quality outcomes, and patient safety. Manual text analysis is time-consuming, costly, and prone to human errors. We aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of novel machine learning and natural language processing (NLP) approaches for early predictions of adverse events and provide input to direct quality improvement and patient safety initiatives.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We used machine learning to analyze 9559 continuously reported AE by clinicians and healthcare systems to the French National Health accreditor (HAS) between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2020 . We validated the labeling of 135,000 unique de-identified AE reports and determined the associations between different system's root causes and patient consequences. The model was validated by independent expert anesthesiologists.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The machine learning (ML) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) model trained on 9559 AE datasets accurately categorized 8800 (88%) of reported AE. The three most frequent AE types were “difficult orotracheal intubation” (16.9% of AE reports), “medication error” (10.5%), and “post-induction hypotension” (6.9%). The accuracy of the AI model reached 70.9% sensitivity, 96.6% specificity for “difficult intubation”, 43.2% sensitivity, and 98.9% specificity for “medication error.”</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This unsupervised ML method provides an accurate, automated, AI-supported search algorithm that ranks and helps to understand complex risk patterns and has greater speed, precision, and clarity when compared to manual human data extraction. Machine learning and Natural language processing (NLP) models can effectively be used to process natural language AE reports and augment expert clinician input. This model can support clinical applications and methodological standards and used to better inform and enhance decision-making for improved risk management and patient safety.</p></div><div><h3>Trial Registration</h3><p>The study was approved by the ethics committee of the French Society of Anesthesiology (IRB 00010254-2020-20) and the CNIL (CNIL: 118 58 95) and the study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT: NCT05185479).</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48762,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine\",\"volume\":\"43 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 101390\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352556824000481/pdfft?md5=209048f02e8f384ce8121fb06025882a&pid=1-s2.0-S2352556824000481-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352556824000481\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352556824000481","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:不良事件(AE)的报告和分析与改善医疗保健学习、质量结果和患者安全息息相关。人工文本分析耗时长、成本高,而且容易出现人为错误。我们的目的是证明机器学习和自然语言处理(NLP)方法在早期预测不良事件方面的可行性,并为直接的质量改进和患者安全措施提供建议:我们利用机器学习分析了 2009 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 12 月 31 日期间临床医生和医疗保健系统向法国国家卫生评审机构(HAS)连续报告的 9559 例不良事件,共计 135,000 例独特的去标识化不良事件报告。我们对标签进行了验证,并确定了不同根本原因与患者后果之间的关联。独立的麻醉专家对模型进行了验证:在9559份AE数据集上训练的机器学习和人工智能(AI)模型准确地对8800份(88%)AE报告进行了分类。最常见的三种 AE 类型是 "气管插管困难"(占 AE 报告的 16.9%)、"用药错误"(10.5%)和 "诱导后低血压"(6.9%)。人工智能模型的准确性达到了 70.9% 的灵敏度,对 "困难插管 "的特异性为 96.6%,对 "用药错误 "的灵敏度为 43.2%,特异性为 98.9%:这种无监督的方法提供了一种准确、自动化、人工智能支持的搜索算法,可以对患者的风险情况进行排序并帮助理解复杂的模式,与人工提取数据相比,具有更高的速度、精度和清晰度。机器学习(ML)和自然语言处理模型可有效用于处理自然语言 AE 报告,并增强临床专家的输入。该模型可支持临床应用和实施方法标准,并可用于更好地提供信息和加强决策,以改善风险管理和患者安全:该研究已获得法国麻醉学会伦理委员会(IRB 00010254-2020-20)和法国国家信息和通信委员会(CNIL:118 58 95)的批准,并已在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册(NCT:NCT05185479)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validation of a natural language processing algorithm using national reporting data to improve identification of anesthesia-related ADVerse evENTs: The “ADVENTURE” study

Background

Reporting and analysis of adverse events (AE) is associated with improved health system learning, quality outcomes, and patient safety. Manual text analysis is time-consuming, costly, and prone to human errors. We aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of novel machine learning and natural language processing (NLP) approaches for early predictions of adverse events and provide input to direct quality improvement and patient safety initiatives.

Methods

We used machine learning to analyze 9559 continuously reported AE by clinicians and healthcare systems to the French National Health accreditor (HAS) between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2020 . We validated the labeling of 135,000 unique de-identified AE reports and determined the associations between different system's root causes and patient consequences. The model was validated by independent expert anesthesiologists.

Results

The machine learning (ML) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) model trained on 9559 AE datasets accurately categorized 8800 (88%) of reported AE. The three most frequent AE types were “difficult orotracheal intubation” (16.9% of AE reports), “medication error” (10.5%), and “post-induction hypotension” (6.9%). The accuracy of the AI model reached 70.9% sensitivity, 96.6% specificity for “difficult intubation”, 43.2% sensitivity, and 98.9% specificity for “medication error.”

Conclusions

This unsupervised ML method provides an accurate, automated, AI-supported search algorithm that ranks and helps to understand complex risk patterns and has greater speed, precision, and clarity when compared to manual human data extraction. Machine learning and Natural language processing (NLP) models can effectively be used to process natural language AE reports and augment expert clinician input. This model can support clinical applications and methodological standards and used to better inform and enhance decision-making for improved risk management and patient safety.

Trial Registration

The study was approved by the ethics committee of the French Society of Anesthesiology (IRB 00010254-2020-20) and the CNIL (CNIL: 118 58 95) and the study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT: NCT05185479).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
5.50%
发文量
150
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Anaesthesia, Critical Care & Pain Medicine (formerly Annales Françaises d''Anesthésie et de Réanimation) publishes in English the highest quality original material, both scientific and clinical, on all aspects of anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine.
期刊最新文献
Severe acute kidney injury in patients with COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome: A multicenter retrospective study: Kidney Injury Working Initiative in Critically ill eurOpean patients during Coronavirus Outbreak (KIWI COCO study). Editorial board Contents The association between neuraxial labor analgesia and subacute pain after childbirth: a randomized controlled trial. Prevention of perioperative venous thromboembolism: 2024 guidelines from the French Working Group on Perioperative Haemostasis (GIHP) developed in collaboration with the French Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine (SFAR), the French Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (SFTH) and the French Society of Vascular Medicine (SFMV) and endorsed by the French Society of Digestive Surgery (SFCD), the French Society of Pharmacology and Therapeutics (SFPT) and INNOVTE (Investigation Network On Venous ThromboEmbolism) network.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1