在视力正常和异常的儿童中评估基于平板电脑的 3D 立体视力测试 ASTEROID。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY Journal of Aapos Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jaapos.2024.103930
Brittany M. Wong MD , Simon S.M. Fung MD , Federico G. Velez MD , Claudia Perez BS , Rong Guo MS , Fei Yu PhD , Stacy L. Pineles MD
{"title":"在视力正常和异常的儿童中评估基于平板电脑的 3D 立体视力测试 ASTEROID。","authors":"Brittany M. Wong MD ,&nbsp;Simon S.M. Fung MD ,&nbsp;Federico G. Velez MD ,&nbsp;Claudia Perez BS ,&nbsp;Rong Guo MS ,&nbsp;Fei Yu PhD ,&nbsp;Stacy L. Pineles MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jaapos.2024.103930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To assess the utility of 3D, tablet-based, glasses-free Accurate STEReotest (ASTEROID) in children compared with the Titmus test.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Children aged 5-13 years were enrolled in a single-center, nonrandomized, observational comparison study and analyzed by age (5-7 vs 8-13 years) and visual acuity (20/25 or better in both eyes vs abnormal). Each participant underwent both the ASTEROID and Titmus stereoacuity tests. Stereoacuity was defined as fine (≤60 arcsec), moderate (61–200 arcsec), coarse (201–1199 arcsec), or very coarse to nil (≥1200 arcsec). Agreement between the tests was assessed using a weighted kappa (κ) statistic based on all four categories.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 112 children were included: 28 aged 5-7 with normal visual acuity, 30 aged 5-7 with abnormal visual acuity, 34 aged 8-13 with normal visual acuity, and 20 aged 8-13 with abnormal visual acuity. Mean ASTEROID score was 688 ± 533 arcsec (range, 13–1200 arcsec). Agreement between ASTEROID and Titmus test scores for participants overall was moderate (κ = 0.52). By subgroup, agreement was fair for children 5-7 with abnormal visual acuity (κ = 0.31), moderate for children 5-7 with normal visual acuity (κ = 0.47) and children 8-13 with normal visual acuity (κ = 0.42), and substantial for children 8-13 with abnormal visual acuity (κ = 0.76). Where ASTEROID and Titmus score group varied, ASTEROID score was poorer in 94% (47/50) of cases.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>ASTEROID is a digital, tablet-based test that evaluates global stereopsis, does not require glasses, and provides a continuum of scores. Among children, ASTEROID has good agreement with the Titmus test; however, it may be more sensitive at detecting stereovision deficits. Further study is necessary to determine which test is more accurate.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50261,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aapos","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of 3D tablet-based stereoacuity test ASTEROID in children with normal and abnormal visual acuity\",\"authors\":\"Brittany M. Wong MD ,&nbsp;Simon S.M. Fung MD ,&nbsp;Federico G. Velez MD ,&nbsp;Claudia Perez BS ,&nbsp;Rong Guo MS ,&nbsp;Fei Yu PhD ,&nbsp;Stacy L. Pineles MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jaapos.2024.103930\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To assess the utility of 3D, tablet-based, glasses-free Accurate STEReotest (ASTEROID) in children compared with the Titmus test.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Children aged 5-13 years were enrolled in a single-center, nonrandomized, observational comparison study and analyzed by age (5-7 vs 8-13 years) and visual acuity (20/25 or better in both eyes vs abnormal). Each participant underwent both the ASTEROID and Titmus stereoacuity tests. Stereoacuity was defined as fine (≤60 arcsec), moderate (61–200 arcsec), coarse (201–1199 arcsec), or very coarse to nil (≥1200 arcsec). Agreement between the tests was assessed using a weighted kappa (κ) statistic based on all four categories.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 112 children were included: 28 aged 5-7 with normal visual acuity, 30 aged 5-7 with abnormal visual acuity, 34 aged 8-13 with normal visual acuity, and 20 aged 8-13 with abnormal visual acuity. Mean ASTEROID score was 688 ± 533 arcsec (range, 13–1200 arcsec). Agreement between ASTEROID and Titmus test scores for participants overall was moderate (κ = 0.52). By subgroup, agreement was fair for children 5-7 with abnormal visual acuity (κ = 0.31), moderate for children 5-7 with normal visual acuity (κ = 0.47) and children 8-13 with normal visual acuity (κ = 0.42), and substantial for children 8-13 with abnormal visual acuity (κ = 0.76). Where ASTEROID and Titmus score group varied, ASTEROID score was poorer in 94% (47/50) of cases.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>ASTEROID is a digital, tablet-based test that evaluates global stereopsis, does not require glasses, and provides a continuum of scores. Among children, ASTEROID has good agreement with the Titmus test; however, it may be more sensitive at detecting stereovision deficits. Further study is necessary to determine which test is more accurate.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50261,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Aapos\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Aapos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1091853124002003\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aapos","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1091853124002003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:与 Titmus 测试相比,评估基于平板电脑的 3D 免眼镜精确 STEReotest(ASTEROID)在儿童中的实用性:一项单中心、非随机、观察对比研究招募了 5-13 岁的儿童,并按年龄(5-7 岁 vs 8-13 岁)和视力(双眼 20/25 或更佳 vs 异常)进行了分析。每位参与者都接受了 ASTEROID 和 Titmus 立体视测试。立体视敏锐度被定义为精细(≤60 弧秒)、中等(61-200 弧秒)、粗糙(201-1199 弧秒)或非常粗糙至零(≥1200 弧秒)。使用基于所有四个类别的加权卡帕(κ)统计来评估测试之间的一致性:结果:共纳入 112 名儿童:其中 28 名 5-7 岁儿童视力正常,30 名 5-7 岁儿童视力异常,34 名 8-13 岁儿童视力正常,20 名 8-13 岁儿童视力异常。ASTEROID 评分的平均值为 688 ± 533 弧秒(范围为 13-1200 弧秒)。总体而言,ASTEROID 和 Titmus 测试得分的一致性为中等(κ = 0.52)。按亚组来看,5-7 岁视力异常的儿童的一致性一般(κ = 0.31),5-7 岁视力正常的儿童的一致性中等(κ = 0.47),8-13 岁视力正常的儿童的一致性中等(κ = 0.42),8-13 岁视力异常的儿童的一致性很好(κ = 0.76)。在 ASTEROID 和 Titmus 评分组存在差异的情况下,94%(47/50)的病例中 ASTEROID 评分较差:ASTEROID 是一种基于平板电脑的数字测试,可评估全局立体视,无需佩戴眼镜,并提供连续的分数。在儿童中,ASTEROID 与 Titmus 测试有很好的一致性;不过,它在检测立体视觉缺陷方面可能更灵敏。要确定哪种测试更准确,还需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of 3D tablet-based stereoacuity test ASTEROID in children with normal and abnormal visual acuity

Purpose

To assess the utility of 3D, tablet-based, glasses-free Accurate STEReotest (ASTEROID) in children compared with the Titmus test.

Methods

Children aged 5-13 years were enrolled in a single-center, nonrandomized, observational comparison study and analyzed by age (5-7 vs 8-13 years) and visual acuity (20/25 or better in both eyes vs abnormal). Each participant underwent both the ASTEROID and Titmus stereoacuity tests. Stereoacuity was defined as fine (≤60 arcsec), moderate (61–200 arcsec), coarse (201–1199 arcsec), or very coarse to nil (≥1200 arcsec). Agreement between the tests was assessed using a weighted kappa (κ) statistic based on all four categories.

Results

A total of 112 children were included: 28 aged 5-7 with normal visual acuity, 30 aged 5-7 with abnormal visual acuity, 34 aged 8-13 with normal visual acuity, and 20 aged 8-13 with abnormal visual acuity. Mean ASTEROID score was 688 ± 533 arcsec (range, 13–1200 arcsec). Agreement between ASTEROID and Titmus test scores for participants overall was moderate (κ = 0.52). By subgroup, agreement was fair for children 5-7 with abnormal visual acuity (κ = 0.31), moderate for children 5-7 with normal visual acuity (κ = 0.47) and children 8-13 with normal visual acuity (κ = 0.42), and substantial for children 8-13 with abnormal visual acuity (κ = 0.76). Where ASTEROID and Titmus score group varied, ASTEROID score was poorer in 94% (47/50) of cases.

Conclusions

ASTEROID is a digital, tablet-based test that evaluates global stereopsis, does not require glasses, and provides a continuum of scores. Among children, ASTEROID has good agreement with the Titmus test; however, it may be more sensitive at detecting stereovision deficits. Further study is necessary to determine which test is more accurate.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Aapos
Journal of Aapos 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
159
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Journal of AAPOS presents expert information on children''s eye diseases and on strabismus as it affects all age groups. Major articles by leading experts in the field cover clinical and investigative studies, treatments, case reports, surgical techniques, descriptions of instrumentation, current concept reviews, and new diagnostic techniques. The Journal is the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus.
期刊最新文献
Characteristics, associations, and outcomes of children with posterior segment coloboma. Agreement between intraoperative and anterior segment optical coherence tomography measurements of the extraocular muscle insertion distance in patients with previous strabismus surgery. Family of juvenile X-linked retinoschisis with varied presentation: a case series with RS1 genetic analysis. Fluoxetine as a possible treatment for adult amblyopia: results of a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Impact of a ROP mentoring program in rural regions of Colombia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1