指数创伤后的强化纵向评估,利用机器学习预测创伤后应激障碍的发展

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Journal of Anxiety Disorders Pub Date : 2024-05-05 DOI:10.1016/j.janxdis.2024.102876
Adam Horwitz , Kaitlyn McCarthy , Stacey L. House , Francesca L. Beaudoin , Xinming An , Thomas C. Neylan , Gari D. Clifford , Sarah D. Linnstaedt , Laura T. Germine , Scott L. Rauch , John P. Haran , Alan B. Storrow , Christopher Lewandowski , Paul I. Musey Jr. , Phyllis L. Hendry , Sophia Sheikh , Christopher W. Jones , Brittany E. Punches , Robert A. Swor , Lauren A. Hudak , Srijan Sen
{"title":"指数创伤后的强化纵向评估,利用机器学习预测创伤后应激障碍的发展","authors":"Adam Horwitz ,&nbsp;Kaitlyn McCarthy ,&nbsp;Stacey L. House ,&nbsp;Francesca L. Beaudoin ,&nbsp;Xinming An ,&nbsp;Thomas C. Neylan ,&nbsp;Gari D. Clifford ,&nbsp;Sarah D. Linnstaedt ,&nbsp;Laura T. Germine ,&nbsp;Scott L. Rauch ,&nbsp;John P. Haran ,&nbsp;Alan B. Storrow ,&nbsp;Christopher Lewandowski ,&nbsp;Paul I. Musey Jr. ,&nbsp;Phyllis L. Hendry ,&nbsp;Sophia Sheikh ,&nbsp;Christopher W. Jones ,&nbsp;Brittany E. Punches ,&nbsp;Robert A. Swor ,&nbsp;Lauren A. Hudak ,&nbsp;Srijan Sen","doi":"10.1016/j.janxdis.2024.102876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>There are significant challenges to identifying which individuals require intervention following exposure to trauma, and a need for strategies to identify and provide individuals at risk for developing PTSD with timely interventions. The present study seeks to identify a minimal set of trauma-related symptoms, assessed during the weeks following traumatic exposure, that can accurately predict PTSD. Participants were 2185 adults (Mean age=36.4 years; 64% women; 50% Black) presenting for emergency care following traumatic exposure. Participants received a ‘flash survey’ with 6–8 varying symptoms (from a pool of 26 trauma symptoms) several times per week for eight weeks following the trauma exposure (each symptom assessed ∼6 times). Features (mean, sd, last, worst, peak-end scores) from the repeatedly assessed symptoms were included as candidate variables in a CART machine learning analysis to develop a pragmatic predictive algorithm. PTSD (PCL-5 ≥38) was present for 669 (31%) participants at the 8-week follow-up. A classification tree with three splits, based on mean scores of nervousness, rehashing, and fatigue, predicted PTSD with an Area Under the Curve of 0.836. Findings suggest feasibility for a 3-item assessment protocol, delivered once per week, following traumatic exposure to assess and potentially facilitate follow-up care for those at risk.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48390,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anxiety Disorders","volume":"104 ","pages":"Article 102876"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intensive longitudinal assessment following index trauma to predict development of PTSD using machine learning\",\"authors\":\"Adam Horwitz ,&nbsp;Kaitlyn McCarthy ,&nbsp;Stacey L. House ,&nbsp;Francesca L. Beaudoin ,&nbsp;Xinming An ,&nbsp;Thomas C. Neylan ,&nbsp;Gari D. Clifford ,&nbsp;Sarah D. Linnstaedt ,&nbsp;Laura T. Germine ,&nbsp;Scott L. Rauch ,&nbsp;John P. Haran ,&nbsp;Alan B. Storrow ,&nbsp;Christopher Lewandowski ,&nbsp;Paul I. Musey Jr. ,&nbsp;Phyllis L. Hendry ,&nbsp;Sophia Sheikh ,&nbsp;Christopher W. Jones ,&nbsp;Brittany E. Punches ,&nbsp;Robert A. Swor ,&nbsp;Lauren A. Hudak ,&nbsp;Srijan Sen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.janxdis.2024.102876\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>There are significant challenges to identifying which individuals require intervention following exposure to trauma, and a need for strategies to identify and provide individuals at risk for developing PTSD with timely interventions. The present study seeks to identify a minimal set of trauma-related symptoms, assessed during the weeks following traumatic exposure, that can accurately predict PTSD. Participants were 2185 adults (Mean age=36.4 years; 64% women; 50% Black) presenting for emergency care following traumatic exposure. Participants received a ‘flash survey’ with 6–8 varying symptoms (from a pool of 26 trauma symptoms) several times per week for eight weeks following the trauma exposure (each symptom assessed ∼6 times). Features (mean, sd, last, worst, peak-end scores) from the repeatedly assessed symptoms were included as candidate variables in a CART machine learning analysis to develop a pragmatic predictive algorithm. PTSD (PCL-5 ≥38) was present for 669 (31%) participants at the 8-week follow-up. A classification tree with three splits, based on mean scores of nervousness, rehashing, and fatigue, predicted PTSD with an Area Under the Curve of 0.836. Findings suggest feasibility for a 3-item assessment protocol, delivered once per week, following traumatic exposure to assess and potentially facilitate follow-up care for those at risk.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Anxiety Disorders\",\"volume\":\"104 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102876\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Anxiety Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0887618524000525\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anxiety Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0887618524000525","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在确定哪些人在遭受创伤后需要干预方面存在重大挑战,因此需要制定策略来确定有可能患上创伤后应激障碍的人,并为其提供及时的干预。本研究旨在确定一套最低限度的创伤相关症状,在创伤暴露后的几周内进行评估,以准确预测创伤后应激障碍。研究对象为2185名遭受创伤后接受急诊治疗的成年人(平均年龄为36.4岁;64%为女性;50%为黑人)。受试者在遭受创伤后的八周内每周多次接受 "闪光调查",其中包括 6-8 种不同症状(从 26 种创伤症状中选取)(每种症状评估 6 次)。反复评估症状的特征(平均值、均方根值、最后得分、最差得分、峰值末端得分)被作为候选变量纳入 CART 机器学习分析,以开发实用的预测算法。在 8 周的随访中,有 669 人(31%)出现了创伤后应激障碍(PCL-5 ≥38)。根据紧张、复述和疲劳的平均得分,一棵有三个分叉的分类树可以预测创伤后应激障碍,其曲线下面积为 0.836。研究结果表明,创伤暴露后每周进行一次的 3 个项目评估方案是可行的,它可以评估并促进对高危人群的后续护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Intensive longitudinal assessment following index trauma to predict development of PTSD using machine learning

There are significant challenges to identifying which individuals require intervention following exposure to trauma, and a need for strategies to identify and provide individuals at risk for developing PTSD with timely interventions. The present study seeks to identify a minimal set of trauma-related symptoms, assessed during the weeks following traumatic exposure, that can accurately predict PTSD. Participants were 2185 adults (Mean age=36.4 years; 64% women; 50% Black) presenting for emergency care following traumatic exposure. Participants received a ‘flash survey’ with 6–8 varying symptoms (from a pool of 26 trauma symptoms) several times per week for eight weeks following the trauma exposure (each symptom assessed ∼6 times). Features (mean, sd, last, worst, peak-end scores) from the repeatedly assessed symptoms were included as candidate variables in a CART machine learning analysis to develop a pragmatic predictive algorithm. PTSD (PCL-5 ≥38) was present for 669 (31%) participants at the 8-week follow-up. A classification tree with three splits, based on mean scores of nervousness, rehashing, and fatigue, predicted PTSD with an Area Under the Curve of 0.836. Findings suggest feasibility for a 3-item assessment protocol, delivered once per week, following traumatic exposure to assess and potentially facilitate follow-up care for those at risk.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: The Journal of Anxiety Disorders is an interdisciplinary journal that publishes research papers on all aspects of anxiety disorders for individuals of all age groups, including children, adolescents, adults, and the elderly. Manuscripts that focus on disorders previously classified as anxiety disorders such as obsessive-compulsive disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder, as well as the new category of illness anxiety disorder, are also within the scope of the journal. The research areas of focus include traditional, behavioral, cognitive, and biological assessment; diagnosis and classification; psychosocial and psychopharmacological treatment; genetics; epidemiology; and prevention. The journal welcomes theoretical and review articles that significantly contribute to current knowledge in the field. It is abstracted and indexed in various databases such as Elsevier, BIOBASE, PubMed/Medline, PsycINFO, BIOSIS Citation Index, BRS Data, Current Contents - Social & Behavioral Sciences, Pascal Francis, Scopus, and Google Scholar.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to “Metacognitive therapy versus exposure and response prevention for obsessive-compulsive disorder – a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial” Journal of Anxiety Disorders (2024), Volume 104, June 2024, 102873 Excessive avoidance bias towards uncertain faces in non-clinical social anxiety individuals Interplay of serum BDNF levels and childhood adversity in predicting earlier-onset post-traumatic stress disorder: A two-year longitudinal study Negative emotion differentiation buffers against intergenerational risk for social anxiety in at-risk adolescent girls Intensive treatments for children and adolescents with anxiety or obsessive-compulsive disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1