确定景观多功能性的最佳景观配置

IF 6.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Ecosystem Services Pub Date : 2024-05-09 DOI:10.1016/j.ecoser.2024.101630
Andrea Larissa Boesing , Valentin H. Klaus , Margot Neyret , Gaëtane Le Provost , Sophie Peter , Markus Fischer , Peter Manning
{"title":"确定景观多功能性的最佳景观配置","authors":"Andrea Larissa Boesing ,&nbsp;Valentin H. Klaus ,&nbsp;Margot Neyret ,&nbsp;Gaëtane Le Provost ,&nbsp;Sophie Peter ,&nbsp;Markus Fischer ,&nbsp;Peter Manning","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoser.2024.101630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Increased pressure on land resources to provide multiple benefits calls for landscape strategies that optimize the supply of multiple ecosystem services (ES). Previous research into the drivers of landscape multifunctionality have focused on land use composition changes, but the spatial configuration of different land use types also drives ES supply. While the impact of landscape configuration on individual ES is well understood, the net outcome of these influences when considering many ES is not. Here we present the <em>net-balance spatial interactions hypothesis,</em> which posits that the strength and direction of local and surrounding landscape influences on the local supply of an individual ES will drive its optimal landscape configuration. Accordingly, the net balance of these influences across multiple prioritized ES will determine the optimal configuration for landscape multifunctionality. Further, ES that share the same optimal configuration strategy form a bundle that can be managed together. Using data from German grasslands we demonstrate that the net-balance spatial interactions hypothesis is applicable to land-use planning scenarios that aim to maximize multiple ES. It allows general rules to be applied when local, detailed ES data is not available, and can help identify the best option to minimize trade-offs in the face of multiple competing land-use objectives.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51312,"journal":{"name":"Ecosystem Services","volume":"67 ","pages":"Article 101630"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212041624000366/pdfft?md5=2b8b3a135176ed4f50c7b7bed8434e2c&pid=1-s2.0-S2212041624000366-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying the optimal landscape configuration for landscape multifunctionality\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Larissa Boesing ,&nbsp;Valentin H. Klaus ,&nbsp;Margot Neyret ,&nbsp;Gaëtane Le Provost ,&nbsp;Sophie Peter ,&nbsp;Markus Fischer ,&nbsp;Peter Manning\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecoser.2024.101630\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Increased pressure on land resources to provide multiple benefits calls for landscape strategies that optimize the supply of multiple ecosystem services (ES). Previous research into the drivers of landscape multifunctionality have focused on land use composition changes, but the spatial configuration of different land use types also drives ES supply. While the impact of landscape configuration on individual ES is well understood, the net outcome of these influences when considering many ES is not. Here we present the <em>net-balance spatial interactions hypothesis,</em> which posits that the strength and direction of local and surrounding landscape influences on the local supply of an individual ES will drive its optimal landscape configuration. Accordingly, the net balance of these influences across multiple prioritized ES will determine the optimal configuration for landscape multifunctionality. Further, ES that share the same optimal configuration strategy form a bundle that can be managed together. Using data from German grasslands we demonstrate that the net-balance spatial interactions hypothesis is applicable to land-use planning scenarios that aim to maximize multiple ES. It allows general rules to be applied when local, detailed ES data is not available, and can help identify the best option to minimize trade-offs in the face of multiple competing land-use objectives.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51312,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecosystem Services\",\"volume\":\"67 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101630\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212041624000366/pdfft?md5=2b8b3a135176ed4f50c7b7bed8434e2c&pid=1-s2.0-S2212041624000366-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecosystem Services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212041624000366\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecosystem Services","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212041624000366","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

土地资源在提供多重效益方面承受着越来越大的压力,这就要求制定能优化多种生态系统服务(ES)供应的景观战略。以前对景观多功能性驱动因素的研究主要集中在土地利用组成的变化上,但不同土地利用类型的空间配置也会驱动生态系统服务的供应。虽然景观配置对单个生态系统服务的影响已为人熟知,但在考虑多种生态系统服务时,这些影响的净结果却不为人所知。在此,我们提出了净平衡空间相互作用假说,该假说认为当地和周边景观对单个 ES 的当地供应的影响强度和方向将驱动其最佳景观配置。因此,这些影响在多个优先 ES 之间的净平衡将决定景观多功能性的最佳配置。此外,具有相同最佳配置策略的 ES 会形成一个可以共同管理的组合。利用德国草原的数据,我们证明了净平衡空间相互作用假说适用于旨在最大化多种生态系统的土地利用规划方案。在无法获得当地详细的生态系统数据时,它允许应用一般规则,并能帮助确定最佳方案,以便在面对多个相互竞争的土地利用目标时最大限度地减少权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Identifying the optimal landscape configuration for landscape multifunctionality

Increased pressure on land resources to provide multiple benefits calls for landscape strategies that optimize the supply of multiple ecosystem services (ES). Previous research into the drivers of landscape multifunctionality have focused on land use composition changes, but the spatial configuration of different land use types also drives ES supply. While the impact of landscape configuration on individual ES is well understood, the net outcome of these influences when considering many ES is not. Here we present the net-balance spatial interactions hypothesis, which posits that the strength and direction of local and surrounding landscape influences on the local supply of an individual ES will drive its optimal landscape configuration. Accordingly, the net balance of these influences across multiple prioritized ES will determine the optimal configuration for landscape multifunctionality. Further, ES that share the same optimal configuration strategy form a bundle that can be managed together. Using data from German grasslands we demonstrate that the net-balance spatial interactions hypothesis is applicable to land-use planning scenarios that aim to maximize multiple ES. It allows general rules to be applied when local, detailed ES data is not available, and can help identify the best option to minimize trade-offs in the face of multiple competing land-use objectives.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecosystem Services
Ecosystem Services ECOLOGYENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES&-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
14.90
自引率
7.90%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: Ecosystem Services is an international, interdisciplinary journal that is associated with the Ecosystem Services Partnership (ESP). The journal is dedicated to exploring the science, policy, and practice related to ecosystem services, which are the various ways in which ecosystems contribute to human well-being, both directly and indirectly. Ecosystem Services contributes to the broader goal of ensuring that the benefits of ecosystems are recognized, valued, and sustainably managed for the well-being of current and future generations. The journal serves as a platform for scholars, practitioners, policymakers, and other stakeholders to share their findings and insights, fostering collaboration and innovation in the field of ecosystem services.
期刊最新文献
Ecosystem service supply and (in)equality archetypes Disentangling cultural ecosystem services co-production in urban green spaces through social media reviews Ecosystem services and cost-effective benefits from the reclamation of saline sodic land under different paddy field systems Cultural ecosystem services and disservices in protected areas: Hotspots and influencing factors based on tourists’ digital footprints Valuation of ecosystem services in marine protected areas: A comprehensive review of methods and needed developments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1