高校学生团队组建的前因

IF 4.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Learning and Instruction Pub Date : 2024-05-09 DOI:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101931
Carlos A. de Matos Fernandes , Marion Hoffman , Jasperina Brouwer
{"title":"高校学生团队组建的前因","authors":"Carlos A. de Matos Fernandes ,&nbsp;Marion Hoffman ,&nbsp;Jasperina Brouwer","doi":"10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Students often form project teams by themselves rather than impose pre-defined teams because it leads to better study outcomes. However, few scholars have investigated the mechanisms driving the formation of self-organized groups.</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>We examine three underlying and interrelated antecedents of project team formation: friendships, familiarity with fellow team members due to prior co-working experiences, and similarity of team members regarding gender, academic achievement, and preferred collaborators.</p></div><div><h3>Sample</h3><p>The data encompasses 70 first-year university students asked to self-form teams to carry out a semester project.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We utilize Exponential Random Partition Models. This new method allows us to model how friendships, familiarity, and similarity affect self-organized group compositions while accounting for each factor's relative importance.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The results show that friends are more likely to end up in the same team than non-friends. Similarity is also an important antecedent for team formation: Students with the same gender and similar grades are more likely to end up in the same team. Familiarity and preferred collaboration showed negligible effects.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our findings emphasize that educators must consider academic and non-academic factors when allowing students to self-organize in teams, depending on what goal educators strive to achieve with team projects.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48357,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Instruction","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475224000586/pdfft?md5=a51a2e576643b9199128a7283170da16&pid=1-s2.0-S0959475224000586-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antecedents of student team formation in higher education\",\"authors\":\"Carlos A. de Matos Fernandes ,&nbsp;Marion Hoffman ,&nbsp;Jasperina Brouwer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101931\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Students often form project teams by themselves rather than impose pre-defined teams because it leads to better study outcomes. However, few scholars have investigated the mechanisms driving the formation of self-organized groups.</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>We examine three underlying and interrelated antecedents of project team formation: friendships, familiarity with fellow team members due to prior co-working experiences, and similarity of team members regarding gender, academic achievement, and preferred collaborators.</p></div><div><h3>Sample</h3><p>The data encompasses 70 first-year university students asked to self-form teams to carry out a semester project.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We utilize Exponential Random Partition Models. This new method allows us to model how friendships, familiarity, and similarity affect self-organized group compositions while accounting for each factor's relative importance.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The results show that friends are more likely to end up in the same team than non-friends. Similarity is also an important antecedent for team formation: Students with the same gender and similar grades are more likely to end up in the same team. Familiarity and preferred collaboration showed negligible effects.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our findings emphasize that educators must consider academic and non-academic factors when allowing students to self-organize in teams, depending on what goal educators strive to achieve with team projects.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning and Instruction\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475224000586/pdfft?md5=a51a2e576643b9199128a7283170da16&pid=1-s2.0-S0959475224000586-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning and Instruction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475224000586\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475224000586","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景学生通常会自己组建项目团队,而不是强加给预先确定的团队,因为这样能取得更好的学习效果。AimsWe examine three underlying and interrelated antecedencies of project team formation: friendships, familiarity with fellow team members due to prior co-working experiences, and similarity of team members regarding gender, academic achievement, and preferred collaborators.SampleThe data encompasses 70 first-year university students asked to self form teams to carry out a semester project.MethodsWe utilize Exponential Random Partition Models.结果结果表明,与非朋友相比,朋友更有可能加入同一个团队。相似性也是形成团队的重要先决条件:性别相同、成绩相近的学生更有可能加入同一个团队。我们的研究结果强调,教育者在允许学生自我组织团队时,必须考虑学术和非学术因素,这取决于教育者努力通过团队项目实现的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Antecedents of student team formation in higher education

Background

Students often form project teams by themselves rather than impose pre-defined teams because it leads to better study outcomes. However, few scholars have investigated the mechanisms driving the formation of self-organized groups.

Aims

We examine three underlying and interrelated antecedents of project team formation: friendships, familiarity with fellow team members due to prior co-working experiences, and similarity of team members regarding gender, academic achievement, and preferred collaborators.

Sample

The data encompasses 70 first-year university students asked to self-form teams to carry out a semester project.

Methods

We utilize Exponential Random Partition Models. This new method allows us to model how friendships, familiarity, and similarity affect self-organized group compositions while accounting for each factor's relative importance.

Results

The results show that friends are more likely to end up in the same team than non-friends. Similarity is also an important antecedent for team formation: Students with the same gender and similar grades are more likely to end up in the same team. Familiarity and preferred collaboration showed negligible effects.

Conclusions

Our findings emphasize that educators must consider academic and non-academic factors when allowing students to self-organize in teams, depending on what goal educators strive to achieve with team projects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: As an international, multi-disciplinary, peer-refereed journal, Learning and Instruction provides a platform for the publication of the most advanced scientific research in the areas of learning, development, instruction and teaching. The journal welcomes original empirical investigations. The papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and different methodological approaches. They may refer to any age level, from infants to adults and to a diversity of learning and instructional settings, from laboratory experiments to field studies. The major criteria in the review and the selection process concern the significance of the contribution to the area of learning and instruction, and the rigor of the study.
期刊最新文献
Nine partner languages, one path: Minority language reading proficiency development among German two-way immersion students Effects of SI-PASS on a high-risk course – A randomized controlled trial Context counts: Unveiling the impact of achievement level on teachers’ text assessment How to teach Bayesian reasoning: An empirical study comparing four different probability training courses Understanding teacher judgments of student motivation: The role of (un-)available cues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1