一线转移性肾癌的治疗方案:对随机对照试验中使用免疫检查点抑制剂组合治疗的 2556 名患者进行的荟萃分析

IF 9.6 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Cancer treatment reviews Pub Date : 2024-04-27 DOI:10.1016/j.ctrv.2024.102745
Marcello Tucci , Marta Mandarà , Jacopo Giuliani , Emilia Durante , Consuelo Buttigliero , Fabio Turco , Erica Palesandro , Ilaria Campisi , Navdeep Singh , Marco Muraro , Fernando Munoz , Francesco Fiorica
{"title":"一线转移性肾癌的治疗方案:对随机对照试验中使用免疫检查点抑制剂组合治疗的 2556 名患者进行的荟萃分析","authors":"Marcello Tucci ,&nbsp;Marta Mandarà ,&nbsp;Jacopo Giuliani ,&nbsp;Emilia Durante ,&nbsp;Consuelo Buttigliero ,&nbsp;Fabio Turco ,&nbsp;Erica Palesandro ,&nbsp;Ilaria Campisi ,&nbsp;Navdeep Singh ,&nbsp;Marco Muraro ,&nbsp;Fernando Munoz ,&nbsp;Francesco Fiorica","doi":"10.1016/j.ctrv.2024.102745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background &amp; Aims</h3><p> <!-->The average five-year survival of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) is 71%. However, there is significant variability in patient prognosis. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been introduced into the treatment landscape of mRCC. This <em>meta</em>-analysis aimed to estimate progression-free and overall survival probabilities and identify possible outcome predictors of mRCC patients treated with ICI combination as first-line treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p> <!-->Studies comparing the combination of ICI combinations versus standard of therapy for first-line treatment of advanced renal-cell carcinoma were searched in MEDLINE, CANCERLIT, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, and the Cochrane Library from inception through September 2023. Data on patient populations and outcomes were extracted from each study by three independent observers and combined using the DerSimonian and Laird methods.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p> <!-->Six studies met the inclusion criteria. Globally, 5121 patients were included in this <em>meta</em>-analysis: 2556 patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors and 2565 with sunitinib as control. The ICI combination was associated with improved PFS (hazard ratio (HR) 0.68; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 0.56–0.81, p &lt; 0.0001). Furthermore, ICI combination was also associated with OS improvement (HR 0.85; 95 % CI, 0.78–0.92, p = 0.001). There is no statistical increase in adverse events.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p> <!-->Our findings show that PFS and OS are statistically increased in mRCC with ICI combination treatment by 32% and 15%, respectively.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9537,"journal":{"name":"Cancer treatment reviews","volume":"127 ","pages":"Article 102745"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment options in first-line metastatic renal carcinoma: A meta-analysis of 2556 patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors-based combinations in randomised controlled trials\",\"authors\":\"Marcello Tucci ,&nbsp;Marta Mandarà ,&nbsp;Jacopo Giuliani ,&nbsp;Emilia Durante ,&nbsp;Consuelo Buttigliero ,&nbsp;Fabio Turco ,&nbsp;Erica Palesandro ,&nbsp;Ilaria Campisi ,&nbsp;Navdeep Singh ,&nbsp;Marco Muraro ,&nbsp;Fernando Munoz ,&nbsp;Francesco Fiorica\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ctrv.2024.102745\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background &amp; Aims</h3><p> <!-->The average five-year survival of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) is 71%. However, there is significant variability in patient prognosis. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been introduced into the treatment landscape of mRCC. This <em>meta</em>-analysis aimed to estimate progression-free and overall survival probabilities and identify possible outcome predictors of mRCC patients treated with ICI combination as first-line treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p> <!-->Studies comparing the combination of ICI combinations versus standard of therapy for first-line treatment of advanced renal-cell carcinoma were searched in MEDLINE, CANCERLIT, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, and the Cochrane Library from inception through September 2023. Data on patient populations and outcomes were extracted from each study by three independent observers and combined using the DerSimonian and Laird methods.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p> <!-->Six studies met the inclusion criteria. Globally, 5121 patients were included in this <em>meta</em>-analysis: 2556 patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors and 2565 with sunitinib as control. The ICI combination was associated with improved PFS (hazard ratio (HR) 0.68; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 0.56–0.81, p &lt; 0.0001). Furthermore, ICI combination was also associated with OS improvement (HR 0.85; 95 % CI, 0.78–0.92, p = 0.001). There is no statistical increase in adverse events.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p> <!-->Our findings show that PFS and OS are statistically increased in mRCC with ICI combination treatment by 32% and 15%, respectively.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9537,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer treatment reviews\",\"volume\":\"127 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102745\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer treatment reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305737224000732\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer treatment reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305737224000732","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景& 目的 转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)的平均五年生存率为 71%。然而,患者的预后存在很大差异。免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)已被引入mRCC的治疗领域。本荟萃分析旨在估算接受 ICI 联合疗法作为一线治疗的 mRCC 患者的无进展生存概率和总生存概率,并确定可能的预后预测因素。方法 在 MEDLINE、CANCERLIT、Cochrane 对照试验注册中心和 Cochrane 图书馆中检索了从开始到 2023 年 9 月期间比较 ICI 联合疗法与晚期肾细胞癌一线治疗标准疗法的研究。由三名独立观察员从每项研究中提取患者人数和结果数据,并采用 DerSimonian 和 Laird 方法进行合并。本次荟萃分析共纳入了全球5121名患者:其中2556名患者接受了免疫检查点抑制剂治疗,2565名患者接受了舒尼替尼治疗。ICI 联合用药与 PFS 改善相关(危险比 (HR) 0.68; 95 % 置信区间 (CI), 0.56-0.81, p < 0.0001)。此外,联合使用 ICI 还能改善 OS(HR 0.85;95 % 置信区间(CI)0.78-0.92,p = 0.001)。结论 我们的研究结果表明,ICI联合治疗可使mRCC的PFS和OS分别增加32%和15%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Treatment options in first-line metastatic renal carcinoma: A meta-analysis of 2556 patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors-based combinations in randomised controlled trials

Background & Aims

 The average five-year survival of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) is 71%. However, there is significant variability in patient prognosis. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been introduced into the treatment landscape of mRCC. This meta-analysis aimed to estimate progression-free and overall survival probabilities and identify possible outcome predictors of mRCC patients treated with ICI combination as first-line treatment.

Methods

 Studies comparing the combination of ICI combinations versus standard of therapy for first-line treatment of advanced renal-cell carcinoma were searched in MEDLINE, CANCERLIT, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, and the Cochrane Library from inception through September 2023. Data on patient populations and outcomes were extracted from each study by three independent observers and combined using the DerSimonian and Laird methods.

Results

 Six studies met the inclusion criteria. Globally, 5121 patients were included in this meta-analysis: 2556 patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors and 2565 with sunitinib as control. The ICI combination was associated with improved PFS (hazard ratio (HR) 0.68; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 0.56–0.81, p < 0.0001). Furthermore, ICI combination was also associated with OS improvement (HR 0.85; 95 % CI, 0.78–0.92, p = 0.001). There is no statistical increase in adverse events.

Conclusions

 Our findings show that PFS and OS are statistically increased in mRCC with ICI combination treatment by 32% and 15%, respectively.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer treatment reviews
Cancer treatment reviews 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
21.40
自引率
0.80%
发文量
109
审稿时长
13 days
期刊介绍: Cancer Treatment Reviews Journal Overview: International journal focused on developments in cancer treatment research Publishes state-of-the-art, authoritative reviews to keep clinicians and researchers informed Regular Sections in Each Issue: Comments on Controversy Tumor Reviews Anti-tumor Treatments New Drugs Complications of Treatment General and Supportive Care Laboratory/Clinic Interface Submission and Editorial System: Online submission and editorial system for Cancer Treatment Reviews
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Optimizing outcomes and personalizing care with targeted agents in advanced cholangiocarcinoma PARP inhibitors in gliomas: Mechanisms of action, current trends and future perspectives Local administration of immunotherapy for patients with skin cancer: A systematic review False Positive Rate from Prospective Studies of PET-CT in Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1